Windows 7 on track for 2009

Wow... what the **** is the point.

I find that foolish. And pointless.
 
But... How much better will it be? It'll just totally supersede Vista...
 
Wow... what the **** is the point.

I find that foolish. And pointless.

They are trying to be like Apple I guess.

Balls are on the forehead.

(I skipped KA because no one cares about what he has to say.)
 
It took Microsoft 5 years to make Vista, and that's a worthless piece of junk not really 5 years better than XP, what can they do in 3 years?
 
One of the comments makes mention that Apple has had 4 major OS releases since XP came out. Why can't MS attempt it?
 
Oh God *cries*

Edit - I love you too.

Sorry, on the first read through I missed your post, so that comment didn't make much sense until I had to get my reading glasses, plus the hubble space telescope to read your post.

What will be the difference to Vista? Can't they just make another XP (XPS?) with DX10 support and a vista skin? Eh? I'd buy that.
 
Wow they are TOTALLY screwing Vista owners.
Not that Vista is anything special.
 
It took Microsoft 5 years to make Vista, and that's a worthless piece of junk not really 5 years better than XP, what can they do in 3 years?

Didn't people say that with Windows NT? Look how far it got.
 
Yay, now I have more reasons not to get vista.
 
One...Wait. One year? WHAT THE ****?!?
 
Wouldn't it be funny if there were alot of people still using XP by 2020 or so? At the rate things are going, it seems highly likely.:D To make matters worse, I've heard from a friend of mine who happens to be a Microsoft software engineer (believe me or not) that MS plans to implement a centralized OS distribution method in future OSs when broadband becomes widely available even in remote regions. Coast-to-coast and globally. This would mean that all MS OS ownership is indeed owned by MS. No more online activation, no more product keys, the OS will be owned by MS wholly. You would have to actually go online to even perform once "off-line" tasks as the OS would be part of some sort of centralized server at MS. You would no longer "own" the OS. Perhaps a future method to combat piracy with no benefit to nobody but MS? Either way this would suck balls royally.:P I hope by then hardware prices come waayyyy down as there would be additional online processes even in once said "off-line" tasks. Futhermore, Microsoft hasn't really been known for their "rock-solid" activation servers these days. Just think of what it would be like if pirates gain access to everything. I fear for the future of computing in Microsoft's hands personally. I think it's time for them to pass the mainstream OS torch to another company. Someone, anybody, as long as they aren't pirates. Once MS cuts support for XP, I think I'll just turn off all ActiveX controls and stick with XP until third-party anti-malware companies drop support for XP as well.:P
 
One of the comments makes mention that Apple has had 4 major OS releases since XP came out. Why can't MS attempt it?

Do not subscribe to mac fanboy hype, these people generally know nothing but Mac, so their opinions on MS are little more than hand me down opinions from Steve Jobs propaganda machine. I've been working with Macs professionally for 8 years now and although OSX was a major improvement over OS9 (which was garbage and fell over worse than Win98), I'd hardly describe the transitions between Puma up to Leopard as 'major releases', more service packs with a few gimmicks thrown in (like Widgets), that they charge you handsomely for. OSX is a good OS, but it's not the second coming, or is it as awesome as the adverts make out, though nowadays Apple seem to spend more time putting down MS than they do extolling their own virtues (which says a lot about how hollow they've become). Work in an office? Do graphics? Go Mac, it's a robust OS and will serve you well professionally. Want to Game? Be able to upgrade your machine frequently? PC every time.
 
Wouldn't it be funny if there were alot of people still using XP by 2020 or so? At the rate things are going, it seems highly likely.:D To make matters worse, I heard from a friend of mine who happens to be a Microsoft software engineer (believe me or not) that MS plans to implement a centralized OS distribution method in future OSs when broadband becomes widely available in even remote regions. Coast-to-coast and globally. This would mean that all MS OS ownership is indeed owned by MS. No more online activation, no more product keys, the OS will be owned by MS wholly. You would have to actually go online to even perform once "off-line" tasks as the OS would be part of some sort of centralized server at MS. You would no longer "own" the OS. Perhaps a future method to combat piracy with no benefit to nobody but MS? Either way this would suck balls royally.:P I hope by then hardware prices come waayyyy down as there would be additional online processes even in once said "off-line" tasks. Futhermore, Microsoft hasn't really been known for their "rock-solid" activation servers these days. Just think of what it would be like if pirates gain access to everything. I fear for the future of computing in Microsoft's hands personally. I think it's time for them to pass the mainstream OS torch to another company. Someone, anybody, as long as they aren't pirates. Once MS cuts support for XP, I think I'll just turn off all ActiveX controls and stick with XP until third-party anti-malware companies drop support for XP as well.:P

MS can suck my balls.
 
It would be interesting to know how MS is screwing people that bought Vista.
 
To make matters worse, I've heard from a friend of mine who happens to be a Microsoft software engineer (believe me or not) that MS plans to implement a centralized OS distribution method in future OSs when broadband becomes widely available even in remote regions. Coast-to-coast and globally. This would mean that all MS OS ownership is indeed owned by MS. No more online activation, no more product keys, the OS will be owned by MS wholly. You would have to actually go online to even perform once "off-line" tasks as the OS would be part of some sort of centralized server at MS. You would no longer "own" the OS.
You currently no longer own the OS, only a license to it. Same with your steam games.

I don't see an OS Being completely online, as you would still need an OS to get online. Furthermore, while Microsoft have been pushing there Live service and I know they hope to give people a lot of online tools that are comparable to offline tools (Such as Microsoft Works) and space to store files so you always have them on any computer with the internet. However, Googles already done this and beyond.

btw, Apple < Microsoft. If Apple was the Alpha Dog, and Microsoft was the Beta Dog...it would be a lot worse. Apple is much more closed up than Microsoft. At least Microsoft allows there OS to work on any piece of X86 hardware.
 
Back
Top