Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Glirk Dient said:Good job putting 2 and 2 together moron. You completely missed where I said the post was a joke and just made yourself look dumb. Grats.
Glirk Dient said:Good job putting 2 and 2 together moron. You completely missed where I said the post was a joke and just made yourself look dumb. Grats.
Absinthe said:Your "joke" was little more than a pathetic cover-up for your extremism, moron.
If it was indeed a joke, it sucked. So good on that one as well.
Actually ratings seem to contradict that:seinfeldrules said:I take joy in knowing that more people are turning to FOX then shows run by people by Dan Rather.
ummm.... as nice as it is you provided a source, I highly question its trustworthinessNo Limit said:Actually ratings seem to contradict that:
http://www.newshounds.us/2005/05/18/fox_news_in_ratings_free_fall.php
I'm sure you do. Look up the nielsen ratings for those months and prove me wrong. I have no problem with you saying a source is baised if you can disprove what that source says. Here is a quick article that talks about the CNN vs Fox News batte which CNN is finally starting to win:Icarusintel said:ummm.... as nice as it is you provided a source, I highly question its trustworthiness
Sure, Fox still has huge control of the market; but that control is slowly decreasing; expecially in the demographic of the 18 - 40 years old (the only demographic that matters in media).In prime time from December to April, Fox News enjoyed a 51 percent share of total U.S. cable news viewers, according to Nielsen Media Research (CNN grabbed 26 percent, MSNBC 10 percent, CNN Headline News 8 percent and CNBC 4 percent). Fox News boasts all but one of the top 10 cable news shows. ''Larry King Live,'' with about 1 million viewers on average, is CNN's lone entry in the top 10.
But there have been gains since Klein took over: In April, the CNN prime time shows ''Paula Zahn Now'' and ''NewsNight With Aaron Brown'' delivered their best months since 2003. CNN topped Fox for two consecutive days during coverage of Pope John Paul II's death -- the first time CNN had come out on top in total viewers in more than a year.
Brad Adgate, a researcher at New York-based Horizon Media and a former CNN executive, believes that CNN remains the largest news brand worldwide but has been challenged for the past few years. ''They're still in a hole compared to Fox News, [but] certainly the one thing that CNN has going for it is that more people tune in to the network during a crisis than Fox News,'' Adgate says. ''Fox News has more core viewers, though.''
i'm not saying your wrong, i'm just saying that something like the nielsen ratings would have been a better choice to prove this, since the source you had was clearly biasedNo Limit said:I'm sure you do. Look up the nielsen ratings for those months and prove me wrong. I have no problem with you saying a source is baised if you can disprove what that source says. Here is a quick article that talks about the CNN vs Fox News batte which CNN is finally starting to win:
http://www.suntimes.com/output/television/cst-ftr-cnn02.html
Sure, Fox still has huge control of the market; but that control is slowly decreasing; expecially in the demographic of the 18 - 40 years old (the only demographic that matters in media).
depends on who you listen to on the radio, some have plenty of facts and use them well, which is better than tv in some respects, worse in othersCptStern said:how anyone can watch fox"news" is beyond me ...you'd have to be seriously brainwashed to take their "news" reporting as fact ...and the political commentators are no better than the radio shock jocks: all piss and vinegar no substance or reliance on facts
Well I would gladly post the nielsen ratings but I don't have a couple thousand dollars to access the report. We have to rely on media that do have this money to tell us what is in that report; what I posted being an example.Icarusintel said:i'm not saying your wrong, i'm just saying that something like the nielsen ratings would have been a better choice to prove this, since the source you had was clearly biased
if anything should be killing Fox News' ratings it should be the show Fox and Friends or w/e, that show is horrible and accomplishes nothing
very well then, you'd think they'd be online somewhere, what with all the stuff that gets leaked out from everywhere all the timeNo Limit said:Well I would gladly post the nielsen ratings but I don't have a couple thousand dollars to access the report. We have to rely on media that do have this money to tell us what is in that report; what I posted being an example.
Wow, thanks for that, bookmarked. This is probably the most powerful example of their bullshit coming from their actual news, not pundits. But what do I know, I clearly hate freedom.CptStern said:well admittedly I dont listen to teh radio program ...my limited exposure is from online feeds and fox"news" itself ...but they hardly live up to their ironic slogan "fair and balanced"
check out this humdinger of a whopping lie:
it just screams propaganda bullshit
This stuff never gets online because of copyright issues. I'm sure its somewhere but its like finding an mp3 of a popular song on google; it will never happen. Here is their cheapest report available to the public which costs $250:Icarusintel said:very well then, you'd think they'd be online somewhere, what with all the stuff that gets leaked out from everywhere all the time
I think one of the best parts of attending a military college is talking to actual enlisted people and officers, both of whom absolutely despised the Jessica Lynch thing and denounced it, saying the only good thing it was for was to help to up the amount of training soldiers recieve now and making sure they learn the basics and keep proficiency in them, other than that the whole crap with Jessica Lynch was nothing short of a media travesty, i loathed every second of itCptStern said:
Glirk Dient said:Nolimit...osama is sitting next to me and we are watching the news. On top of that...liberal news condemns the war in Iraq, which the people of Iraq have gained freedom from.
Besides...my post was simply a joke since it was so extreme.
No Limit said:Wow, thanks for that, bookmarked. This is probably the most powerful example of their bullshit coming from their actual news, not pundits. But what do I know, I clearly hate freedom.
Icarusintel said:I think one of the best parts of attending a military college is talking to actual enlisted people and officers, both of whom absolutely despised the Jessica Lynch thing and denounced it, saying the only good thing it was for was to help to up the amount of training soldiers recieve now and making sure they learn the basics and keep proficiency in them, other than that the whole crap with Jessica Lynch was nothing short of a media travesty, i loathed every second of it
Fox News has a large part of the share because people are tired of the other major networks, and Fox News is newer, i think that's part of the reason at least
tbh i was hoping she had died... it would have spared everyone the bullshit that came after they found herCptStern said:but you have no qualms that your government used lynch as a PR tool ..even going so far as to manufacture that whole "rescue" which just happened to be caught on video for freedom loving americans to see? ...isnt that the sort of things you've long accused your enemies of doing? ...propoganda bullshit?
Go celebrate in the streets! CNN had more viewers for 0.00547945% of the yearCNN topped Fox for two consecutive days during coverage of Pope John Paul II's death -- the first time CNN had come out on top in total viewers in more than a year.
FOX News currently leads the cable news market, earning higher ratings than its chief competitors CNN and MSNBC combined by average viewership. Measured by unique viewers, however, Fox is bested by CNN which, during the election season, earned 11% greater numbers of individual P2+ viewers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOX_NewsIn 2004, the perceived gain in ratings began to become more apparent. Coverage of the Democratic National Convention in Boston ranked higher in the ratings than its two closest cable competitors combined. In September, FOX News Channel's ratings for its broadcast of the Republican National Convention beat those of all three broadcast networks. During President Bush's address, FOX News notched 7.3 million viewers nationally, while NBC, CBS, and ABC scored ratings of 5.9, 5.0, and 5.1, respectively.
Icarusintel said:tbh i was hoping she had died... it would have spared everyone the bullshit that came after they found her
I am celebrating, that means that the religious crowd (largely Bush voters) turned to CNN for more accurate reporting. Also, CNN slaughters Fox news in online traffic. Sure, Fox isn't in the hole yet but don't be so sure that it will never happen. Bill O'Reilly as an example went from 3 million viewers before his sex scandal to about 1.5 million today; a trend similar to other Fox News shows in prime time. And come on Seinfeld, are you going to try and argue that Fox news is more accurate than other networks? Please say yes, I've been dying to have that debate on here for a while.seinfeldrules said:Go celebrate in the streets! CNN had more viewers for 0.00547945% of the year
No it doesn't and nobody is denying how successful Fox News is. However, your soruce doesn't address how many viewers they have lost since last year.PS It doesnt take much research (from an unbiased source) to find the details on FOX New's success.
Meaning CNN has more viewers; Fox News viewers are simply more loyal (or more extreme depending on how you look at it).Measured by unique viewers, however, Fox is bested by CNN which, during the election season, earned 11% greater numbers of individual P2+ viewers.
well, isn't death the simplest solution?CptStern said:boy what a humanitarian you are ...how is it lynch's fault the government decided to fabricate everything from the method of capture to the rescue?
I have to ask, what the hell are you talking about? Are you saying it would have been better for her to be killed? I really hope I'm misunderstanding what you are saying.Icarusintel said:well, isn't death the simplest solution?
Icarusintel said:well, isn't death the simplest solution?
i was kidding, i'm still just sad it happened the way it didNo Limit said:I have to ask, what the hell are you talking about? Are you saying it would have been better for her to be killed? I really hope I'm misunderstanding what you are saying.
Icarusintel said:i was kidding, i'm still just sad it happened the way it did
as a white, semi-conservative male i do tend to care about myself a lot (but isn't that just human nature?), but i also care about my liberal girlfriend
More unique viewers. Meaning those that dont tune in all the time.Meaning CNN has more viewers
Meaning more people watch CNN. This might not be better business wise but that still means more people get their information from CNN than Fox.seinfeldrules said:More unique viewers. Meaning those that dont tune in all the time.
Meaning more people watch CNN.
Cable News NetworkMjM said:Is CNN cable?
MjM said:Is CNN cable?
No, you ignored what I said. I admitted that they have far more viewers which is better for their business. But more people (unique people) watch CNN than Fox which means more people watch CNN than Fox. I don't know what part of that you don't understand.seinfeldrules said:Did you completely ignore everything in that article?
Nobody is disputing that.FOXNews has more viewers than all the other cable news networks combined. Even on the night of the DNC. That article was updated very recently by the way.
Are you kidding? Please tell me you are kidding. Come on seinfeld, I think even you could admit that Fox news is there to pander to the right. Next you are going to tell me Bill O'Reilly is really what he claims, an independent. :rolling:People just love to pick on FOXNews because of the perceived Conservative bias.
What Rather did was bad, just a little worse than this:I'm sure if the tech savvy liberal crowd looked at closely at the networks, that they consequently agree with more often, there would be far more RatherGate situations (which is far more serious than anything FOX has done, Rather attempted to alter the election single handedly.)
I sure hope people will be getting information from elsewhere; but I don't think it will happen any time soon.The thing is, the elitist media will soon be pushed out because the US population is wising up. It was all exposed in a book written in the last year or two by someone with an 'in', his name was Goldberg I think. The book was called Bias.
I still don't think you have been able to document one lie from CNN. I'm dying for some examples of this communist agenda. Or is this another one of your attempts at "humor"?Glirk Dient said:It's the communist news network, and communists only run TV on cable.
No Limit said:I still don't think you have been able to document one lie from CNN. I'm dying for some examples of this communist agenda. Or is this another one of your attempts at "humor"?
Okay, so you never heard anything from CNN yet you slander them with every post you make? That makes a lot of sense (well, if you are a Republican).Glirk Dient said:I would say it's humor...as I don't believe I have ever heard a lie on CNN since I never watch it, or really any news for that matter.