Who has more sex Atheists or Religious people?

Status
Not open for further replies.

CptStern

suckmonkey
Joined
May 5, 2004
Messages
10,303
Reaction score
62
..atheists.

Farmer_et_al_large.jpg


in fact in almost every instance atheists come out of top :naughty: ..however religious people, especially christians on average have sexual encounters younger than their atheist counterparts (I'm assuming they didnt correct for sex by priest)
 
there is a massive difference for finger penetration of partners anus between men and women. Men love slipping a finger in girls asses!

Haha only the Christians and fundamentalists have had any man-o man-o action. How funny :)
 
I think the difference between the homosexual behavior of men and women is hilarious.

Women "sure, whatevaa"

Men "hell no, I never did that shit what are you gay?"
 
Well, to be fair, most Atheists don't believe in that quasi-religious idea of purity.
 
Well, to be fair, most Atheists don't believe in that quasi-religious idea of purity.

which calls into question why christians and fundamentalists seem to have sex at a younger age or at around the same age as atheists. I guess religious people dont really believe in purity either
 
which calls into question why christians and fundamentalists seem to have sex at a younger age or at around the same age as atheists. I guess religious people dont really believe in purity either
I think that as younger people, they hadn't had a chance to really develop their misguided beliefs yet.
 
or they've just realised how misguided their beliefs are and do a complete about face
 
or they've just realised how misguided their beliefs are and do a complete about face

Or you know, their misguided beliefs are actually just a self-justification for being a virgin.



Oh wait. That might be the same thing.
 
or do it to make more soldiers for god quickly
 
just so people know so it never comes up, not many religions believe sex is a sin. I know some atheists who think otherwise, I once heard an atheist say that the Bible says that sex is one of the worst sins -which is of course a total ****ing lie, I have no idea where he got that from or why he thought he was in a position to say such a thing-.
 
which calls into question why christians and fundamentalists seem to have sex at a younger age or at around the same age as atheists. I guess religious people dont really believe in purity either

people don't do what they believe in, they just do what is convenient and then repent
 
just so people know so it never comes up, not many religions believe sex is a sin. I know some atheists who think otherwise, I once heard an atheist say that the Bible says that sex is one of the worst sins -which is of course a total ****ing lie, I have no idea where he got that from or why he thought he was in a position to say such a thing-.

pre-marital sex isnt a sin? what about sodomy? hell just having fantasies of having sex with your neighbours wife is a sin. it's right there on that big slab of rock
 
pre-marital sex isnt a sin? what about sodomy? hell just having fantasies of having sex with your neighbours wife is a sin. it's right there on that big slab of rock

sex between a husband and wife (which is what we believe it was intended for originally) is considered one of God's greatest gifts, all others are a perversion of the intention of sex. although I personally would admit that if a couple (a man and a woman that is!) were as committed to one another as a married couple but just haven't gone through the official ceremony for whatever reason then they would be married spiritualy anyway.

at least there is positivity to what we regard as correct sex in true christianity anyways, there have been groups and indiviuals in the past who clearly haven't read the bible and thought that sex=damnation.
 
I love how Male Masturbation is 100% pretty much across the board.
 
sex between a husband and wife (which is what we believe it was intended for originally)

no offense but that sounds beyond retarded as sex prediates marriage by a heck of a long time

is considered one of God's greatest gifts, all others are a perversion of the intention of sex. although I personally would admit that if a couple (a man and a woman that is!) were as committed to one another as a married couple but just haven't gone through the official ceremony for whatever reason then they would be married spiritualy anyway.

but still commmitting sin

at least there is positivity to what we regard as correct sex in true christianity anyways, there have been groups and indiviuals in the past who clearly haven't read the bible and thought that sex=damnation.

it does. if sex, under some conditions, is a sin then the punishment for sin is damnation UNLESS you seek forgiveness. so if you have pre-marital sex right now and then are hit by a bus you're going straight to hell
 
Wait, wait, wait. WTF is up with the mean "age of first orgasm" with male "spiritual"?
 
but still commmitting sin
Obviously he thinks otherwise. I gotta say, if there were a god I doubt he would care very much about your legal marital status. I'm not going to pretend 'spiritual marriage' is a very concrete concept, but it obviously exists outside the realm of humans labeling shit as official.
it does. if sex, under some conditions, is a sin then the punishment for sin is damnation UNLESS you seek forgiveness. so if you have pre-marital sex right now and then are hit by a bus you're going straight to hell
You're viewing religious doctrine as an equation. These actions = these results, when obviously it's usually considered to have far more flexibility than that in the complex factors of faith, regret, repentance, and self improvement.
 
no offense but that sounds beyond retarded as sex prediates marriage by a heck of a long time

That's a pretty sweeping statement don't you think?

but still commmitting sin

no, not still committing sin.

it does. if sex, under some conditions, is a sin then the punishment for sin is damnation UNLESS you seek forgiveness. so if you have pre-marital sex right now and then are hit by a bus you're going straight to hell

If someone is a beliver who committed a sin for which they never had the chnce to repent, or one they forgot about before they died then depending on the severity of the sin I'd guess their faith would still save them.

PS this is coming from a christian perspective, as you may have guessed.

Edit: actually stern, are you even christian? how much of the bible have you actually read?
 
no offense but that sounds beyond retarded as sex prediates marriage by a heck of a long time



but still commmitting sin



it does. if sex, under some conditions, is a sin then the punishment for sin is damnation UNLESS you seek forgiveness. so if you have pre-marital sex right now and then are hit by a bus you're going straight to hell
You tend to over-emphasize certain aspects of Christian theology while forgetting others. There's such a thing called mercy.
 
You tend to over-emphasize certain aspects of Christian theology while forgetting others. There's such a thing called mercy.
yeah that's what I was saying in the end, I forgot to mention it. may God forgive me.
 
How are you supposed to fear god if he is merciful? This is a God fearing nation bros.
 
You tend to over-emphasize certain aspects of Christian theology while forgetting others. There's such a thing called mercy.

well you're kind of lumping all christianity into one big lump of lumpiness. there's certainly room for mercy (at least in some christians sects, others not so much ) but in my scenario it's at best wishful thinking on the christian's part because for all they know purgatory doesnt exist and god doesnt take shit and doesnt believe in second chances.
 
When you're talking about Christianity doesn't it make far more sense to take a general picture of the whole thing rather than create one narrow view based off of your own ideas?
 
How are you supposed to fear god if he is merciful? This is a God fearing nation bros.

a very good question.

there are 2 types of fear of God. the first fear is accepting that God is all-powerful and the fact that we are powerless against him, in doing so we are submitting ourselves to his love and to his redeeming grace. this brings us closer to him.

the second kind, is what you are talking about- that is, being afraid of God and thereby rejecting God by seperating ourselves from him.

true love of God requires the former of those two, the latter cannot coexist with love of God.
 
sure which is why I lump them all together. so the gods hate fags people are = to mother theresa
 
the gods hate fags people

Westboro Baptist Church.


and they need to seriously reethink their understanding of the bible, just like:

A) all Calvinists (sorry guys, no offence, but your predestiantion doctrine is totally unscriptural and John Calvin was a self-riteous idiot)

B) people who think sex is a sin.
 
but sex IS a sin. at least under certain conditions re: NO HOMO
 
but sex IS a sin. at least under certain conditions re: NO HOMO

yes under certain conditions. but what God originally intended sex to be is still alive today and is far from any sin, but like I said, it is one of god's greatest gifts. but it has been twisted and abused so badly by mankind that he has had to place strict rules regarding sex.
 
Sex is the most awesome thing in the world. Sex should BE a religion.
 
Wait, wait, wait. WTF is up with the mean "age of first orgasm" with male "spiritual"?

I know right? A lot of the numbers up there seem pretty wonky tbh. What's the source on this study?
 
yes under certain conditions. but what God originally intended sex to be is still alive today and is far from any sin, but like I said, it is one of god's greatest gifts. but it has been twisted and abused so badly by mankind that he has had to place strict rules regarding sex.

so in other words homosexual sex is a man made (pun not intended) abuse of the gift of sex? except that completely ignores homosexuality in the animal kingdom. therefore since it's a construct of god and NOT man it's not twisted nor is it an abuse of sex. see? god approves of gays therefore your rules are man made, silly and against god's will
 
so in other words homosexual sex is a man made (pun not intended) abuse of the gift of sex? except that completely ignores homosexuality in the animal kingdom. therefore since it's a construct of god and NOT man it's not twisted nor is it an abuse of sex. see? god approves of gays therefore your rules are man made, silly and against god's will

I never said anything specifically about homosexuality, I was actually talking about anything that falls within the perview of porneia- an ancient greek umbrella term used in the new testament to dentote sexual immorality. However I do belive that homosexuality is wrong (no offence intended to any gays we have on these forums) but not necessarily man-made. the fact that homosexuality occurs among animals does not mean it comes from God, the Bible never says animals are incapable of sin.
 
Sex is the most awesome thing in the world. Sex should BE a religion.

Meh, jerking off is easier sometimes. But I feel bad for anyone that hasn't had their balls orally stimulated by a female, those numbers need to go up.
 
...so the animals who engage in homosexual sex are ...sinning? o_O

how can it be a sin if they dont knwo it's a sin or what a sin is or that they're gay, or what gay is ....
 
Study is absolute bullshit. Apparently your religious outlook affects when you hit puberty by five years.
 
...so the animals who engage in homosexual sex are ...sinning? o_O

how can it be a sin if they dont knwo it's a sin or what a sin is or that they're gay, or what gay is ....

well. . ok I suppose it's not really a sin in the case of animals but it's still a perversion of God's original plan.

besides, what are you trying to prove exactly stern? what's your point?
 
Also, I just wanted to add.


Ahahahahaha, you christians are absolutely insane. You guys actually believe the bullshit your church teaches you?

what are you trying to prove exactly stern? what's your point?

That religion is ****ing retarded?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top