Though I'm extremely skeptical about perpetual motion or created energy, I will give clarky003 this much. I could definitely see why the government would supress it. Limitless energy would completely obliterate our economy as we now know it.
I actually think you're right, I might be thinking of something else. It's the inequality of the allowed energy of the quantuum fluctuations between the outside and inside of the plates that pushes them together.
I was thinking of how electromagnetic force travels through a vacuum.
I was gonna try and explain that experiment. What happens is, you'll have quantuum fluctuations in the vacuum between the plates. Over time, and through pure chance, more positive particles will approach one plate while more negatively charges particles will approach the other plate. When the...
Zero Point Force and the Vacuum Matrix are both examples of quantuum fluctuations. You can indeed create force where there wasn't any before. But it's like a magnet, you always have equal parts of each force, so there's no net gain.
You would have to use a combination of gravity and anti-gravity at key points on your vehicle in order to control direction. You would also have to control the intensity of gravity/anti-gravity.
It sounds like pure bull, but makes for some interesting conversation.
You mean like two light waves in an double slot interference experiment. You'd have to understand quantuum mechanics to get this, but if two graviton waves were traveling 90º out phase with one another and intercepted, they would rewind time and find another path to avoid such a confrontation...
Gravity waves are theoretically already traveling at every existing phase there is right now. The phase doesn't matter, it's the effect that the wave has when it hits the object that creates what we observe as gravity.
Hey Neutrino, just to answer your question about how it could create a vacuum around itself. It's real simple. With a high enough electric charge, let's say a positve charge, on the surface of the device, the particles from the air will devide into ions of positive and negative charge. The...
It's theorized that it does, just like everything else does. But it hasn't been proven because it's very hard to observe gravity on anything but gigantic scales.
You're totally right about gravity and anti-gravity. How can we manipulate anti-gravity if we can't even "see" regular gravity? By this I mean we can only observe it's effects, we can't actually figure out the smallest feasible quantity of it like we can photons and gluons. Once we figure out...
Well yah, big bang particle theory states that electromagnetic, weak, and strong force were all the same thing in extreme heat and pressure of the moments after the big bang. It's theorized, but not mathematically proven, that gravity might have been the same thing as well at an extremely...
Particle theory has no relation between gravity and the three other forces, that's one of the main problems with it.
String theory claims that gravity and the three other forces (and matter) are all made of one dimensional loops of energy floating in nine spatial dimensions (six of which are...
Yah, it's called ionic currents. It's the same concept used in the Sharper Image's Ionic Air air purifier. If he found a way to use this method efficiently than great. I'm just saying that it's not anti-gravity.
clarky003, I'm not denying his device does what you say it can do, but the fact of the matter is electromagnetic/weak/strong force have absolutely no observerd interactions with gravitational force.
I believe his device may work very well imerssed in gasses like air. It may also work (though...
Well, the current particle theory of the universe doesn't prove or disprove the existence of antigravity, it just really isn't very concerned with it because it hasn't been observed yet. This is (sadly) the way particle physics progresses.
String theory does indeed include antigravity. The...
If your concept of gravity is some sort of invisible force pulling you towards the center of the earth, it's easy to believe it can be reversed. If you actually understand general relativity (based on observation) or even better string theory (not based on observation), it seems impossible...