ktimekiller
Companion Cube
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2003
- Messages
- 4,838
- Reaction score
- 40
in the state of California, is it legal to drive a vehicle with a single license plate on the back?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Heh. I think you can get your license revoked if you don't have the front one. The front is more important than the back one, because the police rely more on the omni-present CCTVs and speed cams, and not chasing people down in their patrol cars.
Maybe in CrazyKorea, but in the US you need to have the back plates for sure, because we dont have ridiculous CCTV systems all over the place and the cops actually do work to catch people.
Said the country with a high-speed chase every two days.
**** that shit, I'm running if I think I can get away. (and I have, on many occasion) **** yeah, America!
Said the country with a high-speed chase every two days.
You know, when you actually need to chase someone down a few dozen kilometers, going a hundred-and-forty kilos per hour, with an entire squadron of police vehicles chasing a maniac down a ten-lane highway, you know something's off.
God damn right.If you're in the right place, with back roads that you know, you can get away every time
And that has a population six times that of South Korea and that isnt brainwashed to submit to authority at every turn.
I'd like to see you put cameras on the superhighways in the middle of the U.S. It just doesn't work.
**** that shit, I'm running if I think I can get away. (and I have, on many occasion) **** yeah, America!
Funniest thing?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,484764,00.html
Fair point, but I like to call it morality.
Said the country with a high-speed chase every two days.
You know, when you actually need to chase someone down a few dozen kilometers, going a hundred-and-forty kilos per hour, with an entire squadron of police vehicles chasing a maniac down a ten-lane highway, you know something's off.
No idea. It shouldn't be too bad. It's probably a misdemeanor.Lol. But what if you do get caught? Wouldn't you be in like a hundred times more trouble?
No idea. It shouldn't be too bad. It's probably a misdemeanor.
**** that shit, I'm running if I think I can get away. (and I have, on many occasion) **** yeah, America!
If I worked for the US department of transportation, it would be easy. Just a few speed cameras every 10 miles or so on major highways, CCTVs on the state borders, and 40 story tall high-def cam towers on areas of concern.
Oh, no. If they are that close, you are busted, even if you could actually outrun them (not likely).You have to get away AND be sure they didn't write down your license plates, right? Or doesn't it count if they don't catch you?
Consider the size of the USA though. You'd be trying to cover half a continent in cameras. I realise the thought of that probably gives you a priapism, but it would be prohibitively expensive. In fact the infrastructure just won't exist for it to be possible until the USA has a much higher population density.
Oh, no. If they are that close, you are busted, even if you could actually outrun them (not likely).
When you are driving down a road, and when you pass a cop, you see them pull out of a speed trap after you. They started at 0 MPH, and you are already going the speed limit or greater - that's your head start. Often times, they are heading in the opposite direction (on a 2-way roadway), and you see them (sometimes turn on their lights) then make a U-turn. Lose them; get out of sight.
I'm not recommending it, but it's possible to lose them.
I dunno, maybe GPS chips on all the cars that automatically record the speeds and locations of the subject. That might be more expensive, though.
How about a compromise: CCTV on police cars!