Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The story doesn't add up, something else is definitely afoot.
Do they have an excuse?
Considering you can break into someone's house, injure yourself and sue the people you were trying to rob, I'd say yes.It's America, do you need an excuse to sue.
It's America, do you need an excuse to sue.
trains are required to slow down for intersections. I don't' see why - after a kid was hit on his bike, and police are called to there once a day during the summer, why the trains are allowed to proceed through there at full steam.
How many people have to be hit by a train before things are changed. More signs, barriers, and watchdogs are put up. The trains should be required to slow down through that area so that they can actually stop in time if necessary.
trains are required to slow down for intersections. I don't' see why - after a kid was hit on his bike, and police are called to there once a day during the summer, why the trains are allowed to proceed through there at full steam.
How many people have to be hit by a train before things are changed. More signs, barriers, and watchdogs are put up. The trains should be required to slow down through that area so that they can actually stop in time if necessary.
What none of you have considered is the possibility that this wasn't an accident. It wasn't even a suicide attempt. It was murder, pure and simple. A moustache-twirling villain, sometime earlier in the day, had captured these two ladies and, cackling, tied them to the tracks. They screamed shrilly, but nearby residents mistook their cries for the simple joy of playing children. Soon, they screamed no more, for they had fainted under the hot sun, and didn't hear the train coming - until it was too late.
not a very competent villian imho ..I mean they only lost their leg/foot ..he was supposed to tie their bodies across the tracks ..not just their feet ..he should go back to villian school or watch more chaplin/keaton movies
trains are required to slow down for intersections. I don't' see why - after a kid was hit on his bike, and police are called to there once a day during the summer, why the trains are allowed to proceed through there at full steam.
How many people have to be hit by a train before things are changed. More signs, barriers, and watchdogs are put up. The trains should be required to slow down through that area so that they can actually stop in time if necessary.
^see that is a jokeVirusType said:maybe they thought the train was going to swerve out of the way at the last minute.
VirusType said:I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that they had probably smoked a joint.
I'm at a loss here. I think there's a piece to the story that is missing.
well, at least they got a nice tan, since looking completely great is so important to them.
Let me stop getting off track. i don't want to derail the thread.
When I saw McGowan I thought I read McGyver and I thought what the f*ck is this sh*t.
But seriously they shouldve gone to the beach or something if they wanted a tan.
Isn't the world coming up on that "over population" thing? Aren't trains doing us a FAVOR?
all 3 of you who replied to me.
Of course I know what I'm talking about, or I wouldn't have said it. And yes, a train can stop in time - that is the entire point of a train slowing to a crawl when coming up to - and proceeding through intersections. And it doesn't have to be 5 mph, IINM it can be about 20 MPH as long as it's a straight section and they can see far enough ahead.
yes of course I really think that the 'entire train' should slow down because children ignore the risks (or don't know any better). why is that such a big deal? Cars have 25MPH speed limits through residential areas.
I mean, whats more important? the goods arrive 10 minutes later, or chopping children to bits? when it comes to child welfare - this is the governments most prized citizen.
I completely agree that the children were stupid, but stating that children = stupid is rather redundant isn't it? They should know better, I never argued otherwise.
... When I was a kid I used to blow shit up and start massive fires, and catch poisonous snakes and keep them as pets, and those are just a few stupid things I did.
I think you can tell by my previous posts how stupid I think they were:
^see that is a joke
... When I was a kid I used to blow shit up and start massive fires, and catch poisonous snakes and keep them as pets, and those are just a few stupid things I did.
Sounds like something you'd do.
I used to do a one up on him, and when I broke into a dead guy's garage *He hung himself in the garage a few weeks back, so the place was pretty abandoned* we'd catch snakes, take the syringe we found in the garage, and fill with paint, and inject it into the snake. After we noticed it was pretty pissed, we'd make a fire, and "rotisserie" the snake. Then we broke into the dead guys house and randomly vandalized it.
Cops weren't too happy about that.
yeah I agree that there are other, better ways to make a change - for example, competent parents.It was a freight train so 20MPH would still be too fast, if it was a passenger train then it could.
A Cars speed limit in a residential area is totally different, it a pubic place where people live and can freely cross the road etc, But there is no reason for them to be near train tracks, it's illegal cause it's trespassing and just plain dangerous. Surley most of us here have learnt the risks of playing near train tracks.
And i'm fed up with this attitude of not letting people take responsibility for there actions, always shoving the blame on someone else. How about instead of slowing the whole train network and inconveniencing millions of people, because of a few retarded people who think it's ok, to sunbathe on a train track, how about you educate them on the risks. I know over here there has been a campaign to stop motorists running the level crossing after there were a few incidents. Instead of slowing the trains they opted to advertise the risk to reinforce that's it's not ok and it's dangerous.
I saw him first, sister.Please marry me.
I used to do a one up on him, and when I broke into a dead guy's garage *He hung himself in the garage a few weeks back, so the place was pretty abandoned* we'd catch snakes, take the syringe we found in the garage, and fill with paint, and inject it into the snake. After we noticed it was pretty pissed, we'd make a fire, and "rotisserie" the snake. Then we broke into the dead guys house and randomly vandalized it.
Cops weren't too happy about that.
I don't know if some of you haven't heard of The Iceman (the hitman, not the superhero)
well anyway, he tied two cats tails together and hung them over a clothesline so the cats ripped each other to shreds.
Is it even possible to tie two cats tails together without breaking their tails in such a way that the cats struggling won't just undo the knot?