2160p HD

[Asus]

1080p is history, the industry wants 4096x2160

I'd spend some money for that if it came to consumers. Probably take more than 10 years to come out and within my budget. lol
Get a wall projector or maybe a wall-sized TV like in the book Fahrenheit 451.

 

[hungryduck]

lol, that would be amazing.....such high res....wow

geese....50mb a frame....that would probably make movie files at the resolution around 8 to 10 terabytes.....and thats at just 24 frames a second. yikes.

 

[Icarusintel]

Dammit, I finally get a 1080p DLP TV and they do this to me.... ah well, guess I'll have to upgrade when it gets popular.

 

[giant384]

holy crap lol the picture will be show sharp and clear. also the 50mb PER FRAME OMG. o well blueray will finally be useful

 

[JNightshade]

Wow. Overkill, methinks.

 

[Barney Fife]

Now we need to wear glasses to make the screen smaller. :afro:

 

[giant384]

Now we need to wear glasses to make the screen smaller. :afro:

yea....because that makes alot of sense.....the screen isnt larger theres just more pixels.

 

[Barney Fife]

yea....because that makes alot of sense.....the screen isnt larger theres just more pixels.

OH! Excuuuuuuuse me then.

 

[The Brick]

Why do they always announce this cool stuff when it takes atleast 5 years before you can have it?

Btw, 50mb per frame is probably uncompressed. With some good compression you can shrink size of videos to 100 times less.

 

[Asus]

Why do they always announce this cool stuff when it takes atleast 5 years before you can have it?

Btw, 50mb per frame is probably uncompressed. With some good compression you can shrink size of videos to 100 times less.

Thats a good point to bring up. They would have to have smaller sizes if they wanted to use current Discs, even blueray and HD-DVD.

 

[kacation_man]

1080p is history, the industry wants 4096x2160

I'd spend some money for that if it came to consumers. Probably take more than 10 years to come out and within my budget. lol
Get a wall projector or maybe a wall-sized TV like in the book Fahrenheit 451.

wow... that was good book too.

 

[Naudian]

Pfft.

That is all.

 

[-Psy-]

What's the point?

 

[The Brick]

What's the point?

A lot of them.

 

[Maxi]

What's the point?

It's cool.

 

[giant384]

What's the point?

crisper picture i guess and to make you buy videos that are like 20gigs

 

[NJspeed]

Yeah the problem is all the HDs out there now have 1080 PROCESSING, but meanwhile their resolutions are all weak. 1080 is defined as 1920x1080 but how many HDTVs actually display a resolution that high? Virtually none... Most HDTVs are only 1280x760 maximum.. check it out yourself...

That's the problem and nobody realizes it! Even as you go larger, they don't start having larger resolutions...

You got to Circuit City or Best Buy, you can't find the actual resolution anywhere... nor do they mention it, unless you closely read the specs.. but trust me, all 1080 HDTVs are NOT the same.

There's simply no affordable HDTV that displays resolutions above 1600x1200 and even 1600x1200 would be an expensive as hell, and rare, HDTV.

Note I'm talking HDTVs, not LCD or CRT monitors.


Check out this Ebay listing for an $8000 HDTV - the resolution is a measly 1366 x 768

http://cgi.ebay.com/Panasonic-TH-65...QQihZ004QQcategoryZ116202QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

Here's one that finally displays REAL 1080 ... Only its $12,000

http://cgi.ebay.com/New-Sharp-LC-57...QQihZ003QQcategoryZ116233QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem


Of course you can get a Sony CRT G500 21" monitor that displays 2048x1536 @ 75hz for under $200 from all the suckers going HD and LCD.

Google it.

 

[Revisedsoul]

Of course you can get a Sony CRT G500 21" monitor that displays 2048x1536 @ 75hz for under $200 from all the suckers going HD and LCD.

because people want a 21" crt for there living room:upstare:

 

[giant384]

because people want a 21" crt for there living room:upstare:

its true,tv resolution is far different from what the resolution of the computer is. i mean yea they look better because of the 1600x1200 resolution so you have less aliased lines, but on tvs it doesnt matter.

 

[dream431ca]

Not going to work yet. You need so much power, and with power comes heat. New source of power first then, new way of computing, then it may be possible.

 

[giant384]

Not going to work yet. You need so much power, and with power comes heat. New source of power first then, new way of computing, then it may be possible.

no idea what you are talking about.

 

[Revisedsoul]

its true,tv resolution is far different from what the resolution of the computer is. i mean yea they look better because of the 1600x1200 resolution so you have less aliased lines, but on tvs it doesnt matter.

did i say it wasnt true?

 

[PvtRyan]

That resolution is nothing:
http://www.ibc.org/cgi-bin/displaypage.cgi?pageref=2291

UHDTV 7680 X 4320 with 22.2 sound. Each uncompressed frame would be 95 MB.

Won't be around for another 25 years though. HDTV was conceived about 40 years ago by these guys, so you can see what kind of time it takes for this to become mainstream.

 

[The Brick]

That resolution is nothing:
http://www.ibc.org/cgi-bin/displaypage.cgi?pageref=2291

UHDTV 7680 X 4320 with 22.2 sound. Each uncompressed frame would be 95 MB.

Won't be around for another 25 years though. HDTV was conceived about 40 years ago by these guys, so you can see what kind of time it takes for this to become mainstream.

PIC?! D: