Anarchist's Pwned! Pwned Pwned! :D

[K e r b e r o s]

http://hq.**************.com/?page=/featured/HTTC/HTTC.php

Their exact words were "Fascists out!," but it was not until later that the irony of that demand became apparent to us. When we refused to acquiesce to their unreasonable demand - we had a Constitutional right to be there, as well as permission from the DAWN head organizer - they continued with the name-calling and cursing, making a show of trying to intimidate us. As we stood there - the anarchists demanding our immediate exit and we refusing to comply - a crowd of anarchists began to gather around us. As I noticed this, I immediately told Jesse to watch his back, and told my ProtestWarriors to get closer together. I remembered the RNC, and was not looking foward to a repeat of the violence there.

Our interaction with the anarchists quickly worsened; they began grabbing at our signs, and attempting to rip them out of our hands. We held on tight, and told them to lay off. As they began shoving us, a man who identified himself as a "DAWN marshal" ran over and stepped in between our two groups. "You can not do that here!" he shouted at the anarchists. "This is a peaceful rally!" When they directed their vitriol at the DAWN marshal - actually shoving him and threatening him with further violence - he whirled around and began berating us. "You're instigating!" he told us. "You have to leave!" I attempted to placate him, explaining that we were there with permission from the organizer, but he was beyond reason. He was unable to do anything but call the ProtestWarriors "instigators." As we watched him struggle to restrain the anarchists, we were momentarily dumbfounded. Here was a man who had not only witnessed the violence of the anarchists, but was currently subjected to it - and yet he was blaming us for what was clearly unprovoked intimidation. We wondered at the moral relativism that must be at work in this man's brain, enabling him to blame the victim for the crime.

When it became obvious that the DAWN marshal was not going to take **************'s side in the matter, I decided to ignore him and told my ProtestWarriors to stay where they were. "We're not going anywhere," I told both the marshal and the anarchists. Things then began to get tense; a heavy-set black man in a trench coat patted his left lapel, muttering something about a pipe. When he saw that we weren't leaving, he made a grab for one of our signs. I stepped in to get between him and the **************, and was tripped by one of the anarchists. At that moment, all hell broke loose.

 

[Korgoth]

wow thanks for sharing this site, all kinds of laughs. These people are sad.

 

[K e r b e r o s]

Welcome to the thread!

 

[kmack]

Welcome to the thread!

stop bumping your useless thread with attacks on other posters in this forum.

 

[K e r b e r o s]

Welcome to the thread! Oh yea, did you have something to say?

 

[Mechagodzilla]

They're more lame than real protestors.

How did they 'own' anyone by the way? With their 'WMDs exist' signs?

 

[Bodacious]

They're more lame than real protestors.

How did they 'own' anyone by the way? With their 'WMDs exist' signs?

No, by proving that "peace protestors" are hypocrits.

 

[Mechagodzilla]

No, by proving that "peace protestors" are hypocrits.

Honestly, their entire plan is based around trying to piss off already angry random strangers. Then they succeed and pet themselves on the back.

And there's a difference bettween being Anti-Iraq war and Anti-Violence in general that some people don't seem to understand.

Sooo Coool!

 

[seinfeldrules]

stop bumping your useless thread with attacks on other posters in this forum.

Ummmm. That was appropriate :upstare:

 

[K e r b e r o s]

^ Sssh, he might actually believe your sarcasm

 

[Korgoth]

Honestly, their entire plan is based around trying to piss off already angry random strangers. Then they succeed and pet themselves on the back.

And there's a difference bettween being Anti-Iraq war and Anti-Violence in general that some people don't seem to understand.

Sooo Coool!

Exactly


(btw that picture sums it all up)

 

[K e r b e r o s]

No, not exactly. They're whole goal is to be who they are, say what they say with their constitution guarding them, and yet manage to piss someone off because of who they might be.

They proved to me peace-protestors cannot peacefully protest.

 

[Razor]

I am fully in support of what they did, they did nothing wrong, made a peaceful protest, like the anti war protestors were doing, but the anti-war protestors just happened to turn violent.

The website did seem to be very biased, but it doesn't make any different then anti-war and peace loving protestors attacking people with their own views and opinions.

My thoughts on the anti-capitalist, anti-war, anti...protestors are that some of them are sheep following whoever commands them, others are intelligent people that have looked at the situation and made their opinion and then others are just scum who break shop windows and spray swastika's on statues of Winston Churchill.

 

[Calanen]

Honestly, their entire plan is based around trying to piss off already angry random strangers. Then they succeed and pet themselves on the back.

All these guys are doing is protesting and providing an alternative point of view - so what? They deserve to be bashed for that? 'We are offended by your very presence so let's bash you!' They were just holding up signs, not even shouting down speeches or being disruptive. It seems to me that the left who screams about the right being intolerant, are pretty intolerant themselves.

Others may recall when a friend of mine was pulled out of his wheelchair and bashed by 'peace protestors' when he had the audacity to protest in support of the war on afghanistan. Its a common theme.

 

[Razor]

Others may recall when a friend of mine was pulled out of his wheelchair and bashed by 'peace protestors' when he had the audacity to protest in support of the war on afghanistan. Its a common theme.

Whether they're left wing or right wing, everyone is still capable of such acts.

 

[jondy]

Whether they're left wing or right wing, everyone is still capable of such acts.

Agreed, mob mentality is a powerful force; bear in mind the left generally hold protests more than the right and thus are statistically more likely to go ahead and do that kindof shit.

Not that I condone it, these incidents are one of the reasons I don't usually go to protests

 

[ComradeBadger]

This means: precisely **** all

Mobs will be mobs, thats why you gotta make them disperse

 

[aeroripper]

To the NYC, Philly and D.C. ProtestWarriors that took part in Hail to the Chief, you are all commended for going into such hostile territory under difficult conditions and exposing just how dark and disturbed the enemy is. You see them marching with black coffins, that's how spiritually low and obsessed with death they are. You took some blows but you proved how it's the other side that's truly scared. They outnumber us 1000 to 1 and yet they fear us. For they know the power of ideas, and they know what they've got and they know what we're holding. You're all awarded our star of valor.

Spiritually low? How Dark and disturbing the "enemy" is? Wow before you know it you'll be calling them terrorists and under the patriot acts get thrown in jail for the rest of their lives and "coercively" tortured. So go lick the administrations boots while sitting on your collective moral high horses. Why don't you ask the government why they won't allow caskets from Iraq be filmed huh? Guess somebody's gotta show the real truth of it, and don't give me that "war is war" crap because that's just a loose justification to invade\occupy anything. Or how about "to save american lives?", yea truman, lets kill innocent people in hiroshima and nagasaki because it would have saved american lives. That a-hole was a war criminal tried and true but our side one so you'll never heard of it. Look at bush and his administration, we can pre-emptively attack countries now if they pose a threat to us. Although all that fake science they used to invade iraq was total crap and disproved. Quit being so ignorant and ready to servile the president.

go read about it from REAL scientists
www.ucsusa.com

or from their report on the administrations abuse of science to fit a politcal agena.


Although i did find it ironic that the anarchists calling them nazi's while kicking them out and beating them. There's fascists on both sides of the spectrum. Unless their nazi punks, which are really gay. But hey, that's what anarchists do.

And that's right, i'm "liberal", or new jew i like to call it better. Keep in mind the "left" and "liberals" are anything other than the "right, or righteous". Dirty stinking liberals that we need to defeat, soon we'll march them into work camps because they speak against OUR country and our way of doing things. Although demonizing is going on both sides.


Here's the report:

http://www.ucsusa.org/publications/catalyst.cfm?publicationID=852

EDIT: come to think of it i was yelling at the people who did this protest not anybody on the forums i can think of.

 

[staticprimer]

There's fascists on both sides of the spectrum.

Well... technically fascists are on only one side of the spectrum, the extreme right. Communism is on the other side. Sorry, I can't help being nitpicky, its just one of my things, it really pisses off my friends and family.

 

[Scoobnfl]

Honestly, their entire plan is based around trying to piss off already angry random strangers. Then they succeed and pet themselves on the back.

And there's a difference bettween being Anti-Iraq war and Anti-Violence in general that some people don't seem to understand.

Sooo Coool!

This is the beauty of the hypocrisy of the left.

The protest warriors are exercising their first amendment right. It goes both ways, you lefties can bitch and moan and so can the right. Ya'll just seem to think that the first amendment only applies to you and your views when in fact it is for every individual and their individual view, and their right to express it.

 

[bliink]

This is the beauty of the hypocrisy of the left.

The protest warriors are exercising their first amendment right. It goes both ways, you lefties can bitch and moan and so can the right. Ya'll just seem to think that the first amendment only applies to you and your views when in fact it is for every individual and their individual view, and their right to express it.

He wasn't at all suggesting they should have their rights removed.
Read posts carefully before you fly off the handle at other members.

Sometimes it seems like people only read each others posts for the sole purpose of finding some way to start another fight or argument.

 

[Scoobnfl]

He wasn't at all suggesting they should have their rights removed.
Read posts carefully before you fly off the handle at other members.

Sometimes it seems like people only read each others posts for the sole purpose of finding some way to start another fight or argument.

It's a protest sweetie. That's why they're called protestors. That is why at a democratic rally you will find right wingers there exercising their 1st amendment right. It's also the same reason why you find left wing loons at republican events, they are there exercising their first amendment right. They're not there to "piss" people off, they are there to get their message and opinion out, if that "pisses" people off then maybe those that get pissed are the ones with the problem.


And not once did I say that anyone suggest that anyones rights be removed, I merely pointed out the intolerance of the left for the rights right to voice their opinion as guaranteed them by the 1st amendment.

 

[bliink]

That's why they're called protestors. That is why at a democratic rally you will find right wingers there exercising their 1st amendment right. It's also the same reason why you find left wing loons at republican events, they are there exercising their first amendment right. They're not there to "piss" people off, they are there to get their message and opinion out, if that "pisses" people off then maybe those that get pissed are the ones with the problem.


And not once did I say that anyone suggest that anyones rights be removed, I merely pointed out the intolerance of the left for the rights right to voice their opinion as guaranteed them by the 1st amendment.

He was saying that they were trying to protest, but were in fact inciting more violence than they prevented... along those lines- It was not a 1st ammendment based argument.
Its almost like you were turning his post into something you can argue better for the sake of argument.

It's a protest sweetie.

Don't patronise me

 

[Mechagodzilla]

This is the beauty of the hypocrisy of the left.

The protest warriors are exercising their first amendment right. It goes both ways, you lefties can bitch and moan and so can the right. Ya'll just seem to think that the first amendment only applies to you and your views when in fact it is for every individual and their individual view, and their right to express it.

Yeah, I'll walk into a bar mitzvah dressed as Hitler. What? People are getting angry? I don't understand???? Obviously I've proven that jews are evil and spiritually dark.

I'll dress up in women's clothes and go to an anti-gay rally? OH NO THIS HAS PROVEN THAT CONSERVATIVES ARE EVIL WHY ARE THEY ACTING VIOLENT TOWARDS ME???

I'm not talking about the first amendment. I'm talking about deliberately dressing up in a costume designed to make a specific group of people very unhappy, then acting with shock and surprise that it worked.

I have the first-amendment right to call your mother a whore. But common sense tells me that that's a stupid thing to say to a complete stranger.

And for **** sakes, I'm so tempted to join the goddamn republican party because whenever I write anything there's this bullshit about 'hypocracy of the left" and "loony left" or any other thing.

At what point did I say anything about these people being bad for being conservative? Or even about conservative in general? I said they were bad because they are ASSHOLES. And only slightly worse than then the other protestors. It's the lowest form of debate on either side, and the first amendment doesn't protect you from being STUPID.

So take your "beautiful hypocracy" condescention, and stick up your ass. First Amendment that.
Not everything wrong with the world is left and not everything right is you. But using political affiliation instead of a real argument is getting old so damn fast.

Lool you are conservative lolo! Obviously your dumb post is a direct result of you being conservative! You are prooof that the conservative party as a whole is out of touch with reality looolol!

 

[CptStern]

meh I dont think I'd have a hard time stumping them ...there's just so much stuff out there they couldnt possibly answer it all ..that and the fact that their tactics are pointless and useless and a waste of time ..they really should find something better to do ...like look at facts

 

[Scoobnfl]

I'm not talking about the first amendment. I'm talking about deliberately dressing up in a costume designed to make a specific group of people very unhappy, then acting with shock and surprise that it worked.

where were they wearing costumes? the only people at protests I've seen wearing costumes, and dressed like Nazis are at leftwing rallies.

I'm talking about them exercising their right to assemble, express their opinion as guaranteed them by the 1st amendment without being attacked.

and for the record I wanted Lieberman as president

 

[mabufo]

I have no respect for anarchists at all... In all honesty, I can't stand the people.

By creating their own sociopathic counter-culture they do the exact thing they aim to abolish.

Crazy huh?

 

[bliink]

I have no respect for anarchists at all... In all honesty, I can't stand the people.

By creating their own sociopathic counter-culture they do the exact thing they aim to abolish.

Crazy huh?

I think he was just labeling oponents to the protesters as anarchists.

 

[Tr0n]

I love the society we live in.

Everything has labels...like in a grocery store.

 

[mabufo]

I think he was just labeling oponents to the protesters as anarchists.

Possibly.. but from what I see all the time the anarchists do exactly what is on the website... I'm just sick of them and their punk bullshit, primarily because it just doesn't make any sense at all.

 

[Raziaar]

I actually read this whole thing last night. You left out an important part of that article.

As we left, we continued to be harassed by the anarchists; it seemed that our exit was not enough to satiate their bloodlust. They shoved us, cursed at us, and grabbed at our signs. I asked one of the anarchists what more they wanted from us; we were already leaving. He responded with a tone of cold hatred, "We want you to move faster, Nazi." I was dumbfounded - they were forceably marching us out their rally, and had the audacity (or the stupidity) to call us Nazis. "Mach shnell, Juden, eh?" I muttered. As the rest of the ProtestWarriors exited the park, and Jesse and I backed out of the park (there was no way we were turning our backs on such criminals), I asked one of the anarchists why he covered his face; his response belied their entire purpose and function at the DAWN rally: "So we can f*** you up and get away with it."

Or more specifically...

I asked one of the anarchists why he covered his face; his response belied their entire purpose and function at the DAWN rally: "So we can f*** you up and get away with it."

 

[mabufo]

Did I mention I hate anarchists?

I thought they were supposed to be peaceful folks anyway.. isn't that the philosophy of anarchy? Like a utopia sort of thing?

 

[Absinthe]

Well, something along the lines of that.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=anarchism&r=f

Of course, the common definition of an anarchist is one that actively resists and/or terrorizes the state.

 

[Razor]

I actually read this whole thing last night. You left out an important part of that article.



Or more specifically...

and then others are just scum who break shop windows and spray swastika's on statues of Winston Churchill.

Exactly, there are people their exercising their views in a peaceful and productive way, then there are the scum who just like to cause trouble. Everyone who attacked the "anti protester protesters" were of the scum part.

What i would love to ask the anti war protestors though is if they would be willing to fight for and die for their right to protest against war.

 

[Absinthe]

What i would love to ask the anti war protestors though is if they would be willing to fight for and die for their right to protest against war.

And what would that accomplish, exactly?

Are you somehow implying that Saddam was infringing our our constitutional rights?

 

[Calanen]

Yeah, I'll walk into a bar mitzvah dressed as Hitler. What? People are getting angry? I don't understand???? Obviously I've proven that jews are evil and spiritually dark.

I'll dress up in women's clothes and go to an anti-gay rally? OH NO THIS HAS PROVEN THAT CONSERVATIVES ARE EVIL WHY ARE THEY ACTING VIOLENT TOWARDS ME???

This is just silly talk. These guys protested, and held up signs that had a different point of view. You guys are lucky there were Nazis in WW2 otherwise you would have nothing to keep comparing the conservatives too.

Holding up a sign at a rally that offers a different viewpoint, is not in any way comparable to attending a bar mitzvah dressed in nazi uniform. NOTHING. The fact that you would try and compare the two, just smacks of desperation.

When people protest - there's no problem with other people appearing and having their own placards and saying whatever.

The left is massively hypocritical with this. We are the left - we champion freedom for all - EXCEPT FOR YOU STINKING CONSERVATIVE - wait while I get my anarachist punk friends to bash you. Oh, and you protesting the same way we are means you are just like a person who likes to go to bar mitzvah's dressed as Hitler so of course we can bash you.

Truly through the looking glass.

 

[Calanen]

Btw - thanks for putting up the original link. I joined up with the Australian Chapter.

 

[Korgoth]

At the end of the day, you guys are still defending a group that intentionally incites violence, then cries when things go the way they wanted. Simple as that, by all means they have the freedom to go get their asses kicked on a regular basis, and by all means I hope they provide more entertaining video of it. But just like one group of violent protestors does not represent a whole group, nor do these tater heads, so I'll refrain from passing judgement on to you guys who are defending them here. Because deep down, I am all but sure you understand what is really going on here.

 

[Ennui]

Since when are ANARCHISTS at all representative of peaceful protestors as a whole?

that's a stupid ****ing article by a stupid ****ing group of people.

 

[Absinthe]

Since when are ANARCHISTS at all representative of peaceful protestors as a whole?

that's a stupid ****ing article by a stupid ****ing group of people.

Not to mention overly dramatic and one-sided.

The people shown in that video don't represent any majority.