Anarchist's Pwned! Pwned Pwned! :D

Innervision961 said:
I am all but sure you understand what is really going on here.

yes it's the hypocrisy of the left in full swing.


I do not understand how someone who is peacibly demonstrating, holding a sign with a differing POV is inciting violence. Can you please explain how that action is menat to incite violence.

I would decry the actions of those on the right that might attack or intimidate those on the left for exercising their constitutional rights, why is it so hard for those of you on the left to practice some of the tolerance ya'll are so fond of and decry the actions by some violent lefties perpetrated against people doing nothing but exercising their 1st amendment rights?


hypocrisy?
 
Innervision961 said:
At the end of the day, you guys are still defending a group that intentionally incites violence, then cries when things go the way they wanted. Simple as that, by all means they have the freedom to go get their asses kicked on a regular basis, and by all means I hope they provide more entertaining video of it. But just like one group of violent protestors does not represent a whole group, nor do these tater heads, so I'll refrain from passing judgement on to you guys who are defending them here. Because deep down, I am all but sure you understand what is really going on here.

So I assume that me and my skinhead mates have not only your permission but your support to bash the next group of leftist protestors we see, because they are inciting us to violence with their protests?

Or do only the left get to protest and not the right?

Offering an alternative viewpoint is not inciting anything.
 
Calanen said:
Offering an alternative viewpoint is not inciting anything.

It really depends on how its "offered"... I mean, you're a law student right? you should know better heh.
 
heh I really dont know what the fuss is all about ..there were TWELVE protest"warriors" ...hehe that's pathetic if you ask me ...when war broke out there demonstrations worldwide to the tune of 30 MILLION
 
Scoobnfl said:
yes it's the hypocrisy of the left in full swing.


I do not understand how someone who is peacibly demonstrating, holding a sign with a differing POV is inciting violence. Can you please explain how that action is menat to incite violence.

I would decry the actions of those on the right that might attack or intimidate those on the left for exercising their constitutional rights, why is it so hard for those of you on the left to practice some of the tolerance ya'll are so fond of and decry the actions by some violent lefties perpetrated against people doing nothing but exercising their 1st amendment rights?


hypocrisy?

Are you honestly this dense? Did you completely miss the part where I said the group that got violent with them does not represent the entire group of protestors, nor does it reflect an entire section of society which happens to have different views and beliefs than you.

Hypocrisy is bombing an abortion clinic then screaming about right to life... Well how many did you just kill in the explosion dipshit?
 
Calanen said:
So I assume that me and my skinhead mates have not only your permission but your support to bash the next group of leftist protestors we see, because they are inciting us to violence with their protests?

Or do only the left get to protest and not the right?

Offering an alternative viewpoint is not inciting anything.

So you ARE a skinhead, I KNEW IT!
 
CptStern said:
heh I really dont know what the fuss is all about ..there were TWELVE protest"warriors" ...hehe that's pathetic if you ask me ...when war broke out there demonstrations worldwide to the tune of 30 MILLION

It's a small little organization stern... come down from fantawsy world for a second okay?
 
mabufo said:
It's a small little organization stern...

ya well they have a lot of work ahead of them


sf18Jan03.jpg

15n_Rally1,0.jpg


mn_protestaerial27_db.jpg


Goteborg.jpg
 
and not just in the US of A but abroad:

italy
florencedemo110902.jpg


Japan

japanese_women_nowar.jpg


here's South korea

asia-South%20Koreans%20gather%20at%20an%20anti-war%20rally%20held%20by%20labor%20unions.jpg


here's India:

afg053.jpg
 
a few more:

indonesia:

anti-war_indo_10feb03.jpg



china:

xinsrc_8ca165ccb6994dac8d5bcb189995b4fd_MDF43610.jpg





I havent touched europe (cept italy), australia the rest of north america, south america etc etc etc ...shall I go on?


oh btw now that I see that calanen has joined the australian chapter of ************** their numbers have swelled to ....13 ;)
 
well at least they have an opportunity ...cant say the same for the people on the receiving end of this:


b2grey.jpg
 
there might have been more of a turnout:


iraqi_dead.jpg



but even so I'm sure things will turn out in the end

iraq_new_flag.jpg



:E
 
I was almost stumped cuz I couldnt post the counter link to iraqbodycount.org :)
 
a nice joke:


"why did the anarchist movement fall apart?......because they were badly organised!....." :thumbs:
 
CptStern said:
well at least they have an opportunity ...cant say the same for the people on the receiving end of this:


b2grey.jpg


Prove to me that the bombs being dropped by the Spirit hit civilians.
 
CptStern said:
"This database includes up to 7,350 deaths which resulted from coalition military action during the "major-combat" phase prior to May 1st 2003."

source


as in bombings


here's a list of the casualities, you decide


When you're attacking military installations inside cities, even with powerful precision weapons, there will be casualities that are civilian. This is an unfortunate part of war, innocent people do die and as long as everyone did everything they can to minimise the possible risks to civilians, that is all that can really be asked.

I know the best thing to do would not to go to war though, but war is part of human culture so it is inevitable.
 
When you look at that figure, it works out to around 0.000294% of the total population.
 
Losing 1 life is just as bad as losing 7,000.

Those are human beings....Not statistics.
 
Losing 1 life is just as bad as losing 7,000.

Those are human beings....Not statistics.
Putting things in perspective doesnt take away from that. I'm sure the figures from 9/11 would be vastly smaller.
 
Tr0n said:
Losing 1 life is just as bad as losing 7,000.

Those are human beings....Not statistics.


dont bother ..it doesnt matter if it's 7000 or 500,000 seinfeldrules sees it as justifiable
 
dont bother ..it doesnt matter if it's 7000 or 500,000 seinfeldrules sees it as justifiable

You were attempting to exploit the 7000 death figure, then act upset when someone else responds with a figure? How does that work...
 
explain how I'm "exploiting" the 7000 figure
You are using it to further an agenda of yours. I merely pointed out the real % of Iraq and you jumped all over it. If you didnt want to see the flip side of the coin then you shouldnt have brought it up.
 
CptStern said:
7,350 deaths is a lot of mistakes dont you think?


Well, these aren't exactly cherry bombs that Britain and America were dropping. I think the governments involved justify the figure by saying "well, 7,350 deaths isn't anywhere near as much as what Saddam killed", but like i said, civilian casualties are an inevitable part of war, especially when military targets are inside large cities.

As for the 1 death is just as bad as 7000 deaths, yes, that is correct, but you've got to look at it from the point of view of "the needs of the many outstretch the needs of the few", sacrificing 1 life to save thousands and thousands would be a justifiable sacrifice, well, as long as that 1 person agrees.
 
I don't see what any of this has to do with the article/site about war/anti war protesters.
On topic please. (Its a 2 point warning otherwise)
 
Ye, thoose protesters are idiots. They used pictures of dead Iraqis to justify the war.
War does not save lives!!!!
 
solaris152000 said:
Ye, thoose protesters are idiots. They used pictures of dead Iraqis to justify the war.
War does not save lives!!!!


I would have to agree with that, using pictures of dead men, women and children, who's families have not agreed to the use of such pictures, for their own political gain is absolutely disgusting.
 
Yes, using a pcture of a dead person, in order to justify killing more, is terrible.

Thoose anachists, pwned thoose lameos.
 
solaris152000 said:
Yes, using a pcture of a dead person, in order to justify killing more, is terrible.

Thoose anachists, pwned thoose lameos.


No, they used pictures of dead bodies to make the killing stop and too add the shock value to their campaign.
 
Back
Top