freddythefrog
Newbie
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2003
- Messages
- 185
- Reaction score
- 0
wtf is the talk about? I thought about aquamark three?
My rig looks too be the first Athlon in the results:
XP2600+ 512mb 2700DDR 9800np (clocked to pro speeds) Asus A7N8X
36.452 (Gfx 5.340 CPU 5.742)
very pleased with that and the money I saved on the non pro over the pro. Can't see where the extra £100 would have gone. I'd like to see people posting the Gfx and CPU scores aswell. I know this is probably obvious but have you noticed that you score is just your average framerate.
XP2600+ 512mb 2700DDR 9800np (clocked to pro speeds) Asus A7N8X
36.452 (Gfx 5.340 CPU 5.742)
very pleased with that and the money I saved on the non pro over the pro. Can't see where the extra £100 would have gone. I'd like to see people posting the Gfx and CPU scores aswell. I know this is probably obvious but have you noticed that you score is just your average framerate.
Piecemak3r
Newbie
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2003
- Messages
- 112
- Reaction score
- 0
1.2ghz
512mb ram (pc133)
gf4 ti 4800
a PATHETIC 15,000
yerg, time to upgrade.
512mb ram (pc133)
gf4 ti 4800
a PATHETIC 15,000
yerg, time to upgrade.
comparing mine to whos?
Also macgraham u have to remember there not acctually 200mhz apart
AMD Athlon XP 2600+ *333 FSB* (2.08 GHz)
And ur gfx card is none pro, so u cant expect it to score the same, even if its clocked to pro speeds.
Also i would really be pissed if are cpu scores where close, i mean ive paied more than double for my cpu that what u have.
AMD Athlon XP 2600+ *333 FSB* (2.08 GHz) "Thoroughbred" £81.38
2.8GHz (PG-800FSB) HT Intel Pentium® 4 CPU 512k Cache £228.28
A
Aknot
Guest
Couldnt get a score. Gave up. I think I actually heard my Geforce 128 card scream in agony when the "large" vegetation came on screen. It has now ran out of my PC and curled up around my ankle whimpering...
M
Malic
Guest
AMD XP 2500+ @ 2,4 GHz
Radeon 9800 Pro 128 MB
1024 DDR-Ram PC400 CL2,5
Asus A7N8X Deluxe
---------------------------
45500 Aquamark Points
Radeon 9800 Pro 128 MB
1024 DDR-Ram PC400 CL2,5
Asus A7N8X Deluxe
---------------------------
45500 Aquamark Points
M
Malic
Guest
Hy.
My 2500+ has the AQZEA stepping.
FSB to 200.
Multi to 12 and voila. I got the system watercooled
and it runs with 48C.
It was not necessery to raise the VCore.
The 2500+ Barton is very nice.
BTW. your cpu isnt a barton and the 2400+ is not good
for overclocking at all... try a 1700+ jiuhb. or
2500+ aqzea, aqxea.......
K
KnightOwl
Guest
I forget the exact techno mumbo jumbo but 2500+'s are extremely overclockable.
Originally posted by Malic
Hy.
My 2500+ has the AQZEA stepping.
FSB to 200.
Multi to 12 and voila. I got the system watercooled
and it runs with 48C.
It was not necessery to raise the VCore.
The 2500+ Barton is very nice.
BTW. your cpu isnt a barton and the 2400+ is not good
for overclocking at all... try a 1700+ jiuhb. or
2500+ aqzea, aqxea.......
can i get mine running any quicker then? I built the PC but i'm not overly techy when it comes to CPU clocking. I just fiddled with the mobo bios settings.
M
Malic
Guest
Get a 2500+. Its an overclocking monster...
Im sure with PC466 Ram i will be able to get 2,6 GHz out of my baby.
Your cpu will not run faster i think...
Im sure with PC466 Ram i will be able to get 2,6 GHz out of my baby.
Your cpu will not run faster i think...
Kenny
Newbie
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2003
- Messages
- 92
- Reaction score
- 0
just checked, i can get one for £70. The user reviews said it can run at XP3000+ speeds with stock cooling. Thats amazing...very tempted even though I only bought the CPU three months ago. It the bios much different between the non and deluxe a7nx8 boards? I have the non
Jagermeister
Newbie
- Joined
- May 21, 2003
- Messages
- 1,052
- Reaction score
- 0
AquaMark GFX Score: 5646
AquaMark CPU Score: 6628
AquaMark Score: 39601
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=74486441
AquaMark CPU Score: 6628
AquaMark Score: 39601
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=74486441
M
Malic
Guest
Nope. I had the 2500+ on a A7N8X-X (yours) at 3200+ with stock
cooling without problems....
Tested this at work.
Of course you will need new Ram cause FSB200 is required.
And dont forget the stepping! very important...
Best is AQZEA. AQXEA is good too...
TAZ
Newbie
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2003
- Messages
- 334
- Reaction score
- 0
This benchmark is crap..
3dmarks 2003 scores are almost identical for my setup with others.. I have a Barton 2500+ with Radeon 9700 and get score of 25000, and yet some others here with similar setup get scores of 30000 or better.. wtf?
3dmarks 2003 scores are almost identical for my setup with others.. I have a Barton 2500+ with Radeon 9700 and get score of 25000, and yet some others here with similar setup get scores of 30000 or better.. wtf?
spitcodfry
Newbie
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2003
- Messages
- 1,770
- Reaction score
- 0
Yeah, my results were surprisignly low fps-wise, whereas I'm getting decent ones on the most demanding of tests in 3D Mark 03. And those tests are a tad more thourough when it comes to testing shader/dx9 capability.
TAZ
Newbie
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2003
- Messages
- 334
- Reaction score
- 0
Another wierd thing just happened.. Considering this benchmark was the last thing to run in d3d, I can only blame it as before I ran the benchmark everything was fine.
I was playing BF1942 and quit and came on here and saw this benchmark, downloaded it and ran it with crap scores. Commented above and then went off to play some Vice City and my screen went black. Game was running, but nothing visible! Ctrl Alt Delete. Tried BF1942 again and same thing.. WTF!!! Reboot. Everything is fine again. Deleted Aquafux 3 and they can stick the benchmark where the sun don't shine!!
I was playing BF1942 and quit and came on here and saw this benchmark, downloaded it and ran it with crap scores. Commented above and then went off to play some Vice City and my screen went black. Game was running, but nothing visible! Ctrl Alt Delete. Tried BF1942 again and same thing.. WTF!!! Reboot. Everything is fine again. Deleted Aquafux 3 and they can stick the benchmark where the sun don't shine!!
TAZ
Newbie
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2003
- Messages
- 334
- Reaction score
- 0
Dont take it to heart Dalys .. the benchmark sucks and should not be considered a true test of the capabilities of your Gfx card as it is too unpredictable.
3dmarks2003 is still the benchmark of choice in my books as it is a much better DX9 benchmarking tool...
3dmarks2003 is still the benchmark of choice in my books as it is a much better DX9 benchmarking tool...
Jagermeister
Newbie
- Joined
- May 21, 2003
- Messages
- 1,052
- Reaction score
- 0
Originally posted by DaLys
It seems like i have shitty results for my hardware. 19400 or something on a Athlon 2500+ barton (@200x10), 512Mb pc3200, 9500 Pro. Other people with a setup like mine get much higher results.
How much is the difference in your score running the 2500 at stock speeds and at 200x10?
palindrome
Newbie
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2003
- Messages
- 171
- Reaction score
- 0
12k !!!
radeon9000pro
p4 1.8
512mb ram
radeon9000pro
p4 1.8
512mb ram
R
RUBBERMONKEY
Guest
i got 40,531
cpu 8,668
gfx 5,289
---------------
p4 2.4g @3.1g
512 megs corsair xms cl2
9700 pro 355/333
p4p800 dlx
cpu 8,668
gfx 5,289
---------------
p4 2.4g @3.1g
512 megs corsair xms cl2
9700 pro 355/333
p4p800 dlx
DimitriPopov
Newbie
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2003
- Messages
- 1,384
- Reaction score
- 0
GFX 3,165 with my 5900U 256 which obviously pwns and humiliates me
CPU 6,066 I guess this is the Cards CPU because I have a 3.2ghz and it should pwn others with less processor.
Overall: 29,100
CPU 6,066 I guess this is the Cards CPU because I have a 3.2ghz and it should pwn others with less processor.
Overall: 29,100
Similar threads
