Are Men Being Reduced To Servitude?

This is the worst thread right here. This is it.

Look at the bright side, every single thread after this day will be better than this.

You will never experience more e-pain than this.
 
I say we genetically alter females while they're in the womb to be more dependent. Give them t-rex arms or something.

Lol

But this actually has given me an idea. If females were born to be servile from birth, we wouldn't have very many problems, right? :p
 
There would be no wars.
Man, you just reminded me of this Outer Limits episode where all the men died out, and there were only women, and there were no more wars. But there was one guy left over who was in cryo-stasis, and he thawed, and shit went to hell.

In the end the women ended up freezing him again.
 
I'm just going to assume that this FREAKEN LONG badly written thing said that all women suck and walk away happy!!

PS. long before either sex is rendered redundant we'll all be half robot :D

PSS. ok I read a little bit
 
Oh come on, I've seen longer.

Its not THAT bad surely.

You guys are clearly not understanding what I was talking about.

It doesnt say that women suck; it says that women will become superior to men in time, and they should basically stop bitching about being inferior to men in today's society, which is clearly not the case anymore these days.
 
long before either sex is rendered redundant we'll all be half robot
But then we'll have to contend with robo-clits that extend and vibrate! It will speed up the dying of man!
 
Oh come on, I've seen longer.

Its not THAT bad surely.

You guys are clearly not understanding what I was talking about.

It doesnt say that women suck; it says that women will become superior to men in time, and they should basically stop bitching about being inferior to men in today's society, which is clearly not the case anymore these days.

and your not understanding what I'm talking about, I didn't read it and so made up my own conclusion. This is because your taking what people are like now and extrapolating it thousands of years into the future (which isn't that long). Whatever conclusion you drew (assuming it's biological, which I think it was) is going to be wrong.
 
and your not understanding what I'm talking about, I didn't read it and so made up my own conclusion.
Hahaha holy shit I love this.

"I didn't read what you said, so I'm just going to assume I know what you said and go from there."

That's beautiful.
 
This is the worst thread right here. This is it.

Ohhhhh thats mean.

Think of it in the grand scheme of this site; there have been ALOT worse threads.

Hahaha holy shit I love this.

"I didn't read what you said, so I'm just going to assume I know what you said and go from there."

That's beautiful.

Gotta love assumptions.

[edit] I'm kinda glad I wrote this thread, as it means I cant get any worse, and can finally have my 04'er shameful moment. Until someone with no time on their hands finds a worse thread written by yours truly here.

And no, thats not a reason to search now.
 
Interesting opinions sir.

You might be onto something. Maybe it's happening right now?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...prefer-to-stay-single/articleshow/5572852.cms
Single girls in Australia prefer to be on their own than go man-hunting on the weekends, statistics showed.

A survey of 500 women found that 51.4 per cent favoured being single than being married.

They would rather spend time building their careers, social lives, strong friendships, take on other commitments, such as buying real estate, than crib about their single status.
But they care nothing about creating technology, fixing cars, repairing broken roof tiles, fixing the sceptic tank, building hydro electrical plants, flying to the moon, ensuring the future existence of our species.

Woman are completely useless in many important aspects of modern society and will be in years to come.

Some suggest we may become sperm machines, or become useless as reproduction is done without sperm. But can't the same be said for women? Can't we create the eggs from DNA samples and grow an embryo in an artificial womb? Some suggest we will become androgynous genetically modified super humans with a cock and a pussy that we could pleasure our selves with and self impregnate.



I don't think women will become superior. This civilisation will not last forever, probably not even for 500 more years. Women are just riding the wave of hard work and stability built by men. Women won't innovate, they won't build new technologies. They won't sit in dark rooms devising amazing solutions to problems and work endlessly on improving some gadget. They'll be too busy socialising and worrying about the blood spewing from their bloody vaginal passage. Gaping, moist, pungent.

They will become managers of banks and useless cosmetic companies. Completely useless human beings. Men will manage spaceship projects to harvest crystals from distant asteroids that will power our future. Useful, infinitely useful.

When it all goes to shit, physical strength will then become the dominant factor in our cultures. when we collapse back into cruddyness. Once more we men will rule our tribes, we will have harems, bitches will be ours to rule.
 
How presumptuous.

Then again I guess this whole thread is.
 
I'm pretty sure the male-female cultural divide is purely a result of how we're brought up. There are lots of women who care about developing new technologies and making the world a better place, just as there are a lot of men who only care about having enough money to get some ass and buy more collars for their shirts. Fifty years ago, the ratio of productive women to useless women was much lower, and it's probably only going to get better from here.
 
Relationship (as in marriage) failures are, in my opinion, a cultural thing - people get married when they're not ready for a lifetime commitment, people get married to incompatible people, people have a different definition of marriage, etc. If you're not the k-selected type, marriage may not be for you. A quick test: if you get into a relationship-shattering argument over driving directions, are either you or your partner marriage material?

Breaking a species up into two separate sexes drives genetic diversity, which is a defense against life-altering environmental changes (including pathogens and predators). If you take this away, you're betting your entire species that you can do it better manually. Our intellect (as a species, not individuals) has pretty much dealt with the predator problem, and it's got a pretty good grip on the environmental problem. It has only a slippery grip on the pathogenic problem. Specifically, if the ladies cut males out of the reproduction equation, they have only the current genetic snapshot at that time to work with. Polar bears, killer whales, members of the Panthera genus, for example, will still not be a threat to the entire population. Extreme climate change will certainly be problematic, but won't be the end. A single strain of a new, nasty virus, however, would be a deal breaker.

I think what's happening is that both males and females find themselves in a sexual culture that's changing faster than they can. Heck, women are still not fully sexually prepared for the change in human cranium size over the last several thousand years. Only recently, from an evolutionary standpoint, did we break the problem of predation and environment, and here we are with all this spare 'currency' but without the experience to know how to spend it.

Or... Dynasty just needs to get some mud for his turtle.
 
I'd like to see what a skeptic tank would do for my waste.
 
I think it would question the waste's existence.
 
Back
Top