Are you circumcised?

Are you?

  • Yes

    Votes: 44 33.8%
  • No

    Votes: 81 62.3%
  • I'm female :O

    Votes: 5 3.8%

  • Total voters
    130
I cut half of it off and left half. Just to expirence both sides of the equation.
 
I'm jewish blood, however i'm not circumcised.

Also the voting doesn't make sense. Females can be circumcised too incase you didn't know, i won't go into details, i'm sure wikipedia can fill you in.
 
Hectic Glenn said:
Also the voting doesn't make sense. Females can be circumcised too incase you didn't know, i won't go into details, i'm sure wikipedia can fill you in.
Yes, I know, but it's much more uncommon, and is a totally different procedure. It is abandommen in most of the world. This poll is directed at the male audience, since (close to) all females would probably vote no, and as a result **** up the poll results :)

EDIT: I just visited the wikipedia article for female circumcision, and I gotta warn ya, it ain't pretty.
 
Au contraire, I was born without a foreskin and I had my eyelid grafted on.
 
what the christ. i always thought the majority of people were. like a very large majority.
 
yeah, i think it still is a large majority. iirc you have to specifically request you don't want your child to be circumcised, otherwise they just go ahead.
 
Adidajs said:
yeah, i think it still is a large majority. iirc you have to specifically request you don't want your child to be circumcised, otherwise they just go ahead.
It think it's a lot more common in the US than in Europe. Almost no one in Sweden is, that I'm aware of.
 
Adidajs said:
iirc you have to specifically request you don't want your child to be circumcised, otherwise they just go ahead.

Lol, maybe in Texas.
 
Adidajs said:
yeah, i think it still is a large majority. iirc you have to specifically request you don't want your child to be circumcised, otherwise they just go ahead.
lol, yeah i'm pretty sure in 99% of MEDCs across the world they don't :)
 
The Monkey said:
Inspired by the other thread...


I remember posting this exact question with a poll last year, lol.
 
Razor said:
I remember posting this exact question with a poll last year, lol.

And I remember the connection we established with your username and the thread subject.
 
The Monkey said:
It think it's a lot more common in the US than in Europe. Almost no one in Sweden is, that I'm aware of.


That is correct, it does seem highly odd in this day and age, unless you're Jewish, to be circumcised but i do know from my previous thread on this topic that a lot of American's are...around 50% i think.

The reason so many American's do it is that they believe it to be more hygenic and less chance of any disease or infection getting trapped underneath the foreskin and causing problems. But expert medical opinion says that as long as you give it a good clean atleast twice a week, there is no chance of any problems. It's very unpopular in Europe to be circumcised but the exact opposite in America, i'd rather be uncircumcised though as i do feel that the foreskin protects the head and the sensitive underside more than with no foreskin. A lot of people also claim, no medical evidence backs this up though, that if you're circumcised, you do lose a lot of sensation when making love to good woman.
 
Less sensation = Longer lasting!

Edit - And I'm not.
 
I'm American, and I'm not... Although I do feel really out of place.. or at least I did growing up. Not so much now, I've came to terms with it, and am glad i'm not...
 
Yes. I didn't use to think I was, but I didn't think it through too well... I didn't have much left to cut off :/

This one time, me and my friends were talking about circumcision, and jews, specifically... leter I was talking to this girl, she said she was jewish, nad without thinking I asked her if she was circumcised >.<
 
Innervision961 said:
I'm American, and I'm not... Although I do feel really out of place.. or at least I did growing up. Not so much now, I've came to terms with it, and am glad i'm not...

You really, really shouldn't. Just remember women are just as nervous about their bodies as you are of yours.
 
Razor said:
But expert medical opinion says that as long as you give it a good clean atleast twice a week, there is no chance of any problems.

A good clean? Call out a chimney sweep?

Twice a week? I would say once or twice daily...............
 
Murray_H said:
A good clean? Call out a chimney sweep?

Twice a week? I would say once or twice daily...............

Why, do you stick it in dirt every day or something?
 
pomegranate said:
Why, do you stick it in dirt every day or something?

I just can't think what a good clean would be compared to cleaning it daily....am I supposed to be scouring my bell end once a week with wire wool?
 
Ouch ****ing Shit!

A lot of people also claim, no medical evidence backs this up though, that if you're circumcised, you do lose a lot of sensation when making love to good woman.

I'm sorry, but thats just not true.
 
You lot can take your elephant trunk penises and gtfo
 
If you're circumcised and not jewish, then you got majorly owned.

I don't get how guys whack off without foreskin either. It must be so uncomfortable. Do you have to lube your hand up?

*puke*
 
I don't get how guys whack off without foreskin either. It must be so uncomfortable. Do you have to lube your hand up?

*puke*

It's quite easy. The skin moves just like a Foreskin would.

Is it that different for you? Course, your from Edinburgh ... but still!
 
Razor said:
A lot of people also claim, no medical evidence backs this up though, that if you're circumcised, you do lose a lot of sensation when making love to good woman.

Hmm, thought it was the other way around... or was it that it was better for her?

Not circumcised here.

Random thought... I imagine it'd make masturbation a bit sore without the skin >.>
 
A friend of mine is circumcised. He told us that he had it done because he penis 'was too big for the skin'. We asked his brother, and apparently he had it doen because he had an infection. lol @ him.
 
Back
Top