Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The forum is too stupid to know math. It lifts when the earliest infraction expires.
------[PRETENSE OF BEING ON TOPIC]------
Um, I agree with the banning of whatever that it is we were discussing. I think.
Australia banned A cups and women squirting.
You monster.
It's actually just peeing.
I don't want to watch women peeing but I'm in favor of the Aussies fighting to the death to defend it.
It's actually just peeing.
Hey by the way that's total bullshit - there is urine content in female ejaculate, just like there is urine content in male ejaculate - basically the amount of urine left in the urethra. But female ejaculation is not urination.
It is in porn.
Hi Michael and Fiona, thanks for your input. I didn’t really intend to editorialise on the issue at all?—?just a look at the “Purple Monkey Dishwasher” Chinese whispers way a story gets twisted by hyped internet fist-shakers. I think Fiona was justified in highlighting this issue, and Michael covered it fairly.
It’s places like Twitter and Reddit where people just read a headline or sound bite and run with it, twisting a complicated matter over the issue of sexual taboos on screen into “ZOMG THE GOVT WON’T LET US SEE BREASTS!” without actually reading what the original article and PR is saying.
To independently verify this story we’d need to know the names of the publishers who say their publications have been banned, the names of the publications, and ideally the chance to see copies of the notice from the Classification Board saying that classification has been refused or revoked. Until then, we only have the word of Ms Patten. While I support Ms Patten’s political aims, she is a partisan and any publication that reports her words as fact without verifying them is doing propaganda, not journalism. Which is fine but it needs to be seen as such, and when such propaganda that can’t be shown to be true spreads quickly throughout the Net and misleads people, it damages the anti-censorship cause.
You could always get something to remember him by. An item of clothing, perhaps.Wait, Saturos got banned?!
Who will I discuss the varying sexiness of dragons with now?!
How much fail are we talking here? If you had to give a rough estimate in kilofails.So much fail here and everywhere else this has been mentioned.
Do you mean "the scientifically inconclusive nature of female orgasm has caused people to err on the side of caution and ban pornography that contains it under pre-existing bans against urination in pornography" or do you mean "when girls in porn squirt, it's pee"?
Taking a shit is also "abhorrent". Almost unnatural.
Ban it already Australia.
I was saying the latter, but I have to level with you. I honestly don't have enough evidence to back it up.
scat porn
5char