Bill O'Reilly hit with multimillion $ sexual harassment suit! OMG gross.

Why oh why has the entire net had a recent outburst of that whole 'pot call the kettle black' phrase? Its like everybody uses it in nearly every thread on the web right now.
 
Raziaar said:
Why oh why has the entire net had a recent outburst of that whole 'pot call the kettle black' phrase? Its like everybody uses it in nearly every thread on the web right now.

Hey how about you say something relevant? Oh and i've never seen that phrase online... I hear it all the time in the aside from the net, so not sure what the hell your talking about.
Nit pick somewhere else.
 
What a bunch of hypocrits, what ever happened to "innocent until proven guilty". No one, no matter how partisan their news show is, deserves to be wrongfully accused of anything, let alone something as sick and twisted as this.

We will wait and see what the court decides, hopefully, justice will prevail.
 
I've read the 22 page report on that website and to be honest, I find it quite hard to believe that a woman would let that kind of thing go on for so long before saying anything.

But, it's not for us to decide. He's innocent until proven guilty and that can only be proven by the courts.
 
Chris_D said:
I've read the 22 page report on that website and to be honest, I find it quite hard to believe that a woman would let that kind of thing go on for so long before saying anything.

But, it's not for us to decide. He's innocent until proven guilty and that can only be proven by the courts.

Just to plays devil's advocate, sexual harassment isn't always easy to understand unless you are actually there I don't think. I don't really know what it would be like, but I imagine the intimidation might make it hard for someone to come forward. Also, it would be difficult to accuse someoe who is popular and famous like O'Reilly. If you do it's going to bring all sorts of problems with it, not to mention the fact that your life will most likely be dragged repeatedly through the public eye. So all in all, I think I could understand some hesitation to come forward.

But I don't really have an opinion on it. It's just accusation so far. Until it goes to court and we see if there is evidence there's really no way to know.

I just hope that the truth is found quickly and without too much mess. I would hate for anyone's career to be ruined over something they didn't do and at the same time I would hate for someone to be let go if they were guilty of such a thing.
 
Bill O'Reilly got pwned. Now I can check off the final spot on my O'Reilly bingo card. Although in all interest I would like to see how true this is.

blahblahblah said:
Now we need to see Michael Moore exposed for doing something equally horrible.

I agree.
 
while I believe in "innocent till proven guilty" in this case I hope they nail him to the wall as he's done to so many people for so long (whether they deserved it or not) .... I have no sympathy for him what-so-ever ...doesnt really change my opinion of him ...he was a slimeball before all this anyways, he'll continue being one whether the charges stick or not



message to B OReilly ...piss off and die :E
 
It sure sounds like she is doing this for money or something... but I don't know the facts or anything.

It also seems like this is a big hoax more than anything. Has it been on any reliable sources, like CNN or NBC or anything?


It is also ironic, too, because last time I watched his show, he made some crack on a sex offender or somthing like that :P
 
Erestheux said:
It sure sounds like she is doing this for money or something... but I don't know the facts or anything.

It also seems like this is a big hoax more than anything. Has it been on any reliable sources, like CNN or NBC or anything?


It is also ironic, too, because last time I watched his show, he made some crack on a sex offender or somthing like that :P

he had a field day with Clinton's escapades, hopefully someone will give him what he dishes out
 
CptStern said:
he had a field day with Clinton's escapades, hopefully someone will give him what he dishes out

Curious, do you feel the same about left extremiest like Michael Moore?
 
blahblahblah said:
Curious, do you feel the same about left extremiest like Michael Moore?


if he's left extremist what's does that make Noam Chomsky? ...Moore is mainstream left at best
 
CptStern said:
if he's left extremist what's does that make Noam Chomsky? ...Moore is mainstream left at best

If Moore is mainstrem left at best, I'm Marry Poppins. :)
 
CptStern said:
if he's left extremist what's does that make Noam Chomsky? ...Moore is mainstream left at best
You didn't answer the question, Stern. :|

blahblahblah said:
Good enough answer to make me join the Goglebag Army. Can I be a 2nd lieutenant in the Gloglebag Army?
Of course, but you need to prove your handyness with the Penis machine, first :)

blahblahblah said:
If Moore is mainstrem left at best, I'm Marry Poppins. :)
You very well could be. :P
 
blahblahblah said:
If Moore is mainstrem left at best, I'm Marry Poppins. :)

Hi Mary :)


seriously read anything by Chomsky and get back to me ..Moore is a documentary film maker and gonzo journalist ..Chomsky's the real deal ..an intellectual (harvard, MIT etc etc etc)
 
I think Moore's more nuts than liberal, but thats just me.
 
remember now, Bill isn't a right wing nut job, he's fiercely independent...

however, he's registered republican.
 
I didn't read the article in here, but Opie and Anthony read their article and according to it, he had a dildo given to him by a female and masturbated while talking to the defendent

Take that you dick.
 
Yeah I bet Bill really gets his jollies by shoving a vibrator up his a**hole (says that in the 22 pages). Honestly, this is the biggest cry for attention I have ever seen. How can you believe such garbage.
 
seinfeldrules said:
Yeah I bet Bill really gets his jollies by shoving a vibrator up his a**hole (says that in the 22 pages). Honestly, this is the biggest cry for attention I have ever seen. How can you believe such garbage.

what if it's true? what will you say then?
 
I'd be surprised. Its only smart to be skeptical of something so outlandish.
 
i love reading legalese, so fun, thanks for the doc, he's just being a dirty old man, kinda funny, actually, though he is a sad, sad man, he needs to get his sh*t straight
 
Direwolf said:
I'd be surprised. Its only smart to be skeptical of something so outlandish.

Agreed, it is one thing to have sexual relations with a woman. It is another thing for a man to play around with a vibrator in his a** while talking on the phone about having heterosexual relations. The two activities dont quite match up and are quite opposite actually.
 
Innervision961 said:
Hey how about you say something relevant? Oh and i've never seen that phrase online... I hear it all the time in the aside from the net, so not sure what the hell your talking about.
Nit pick somewhere else.

I did, I put in my input a couple posts up, before I decided to add something completely irrelevant to the conversation a couple posts down because I was making an observation. It wasn't directed at you as an individual, it was merely inspired by your post.
 
seinfeldrules said:
Agreed, it is one thing to have sexual relations with a woman. It is another thing for a man to play around with a vibrator in his a** while talking on the phone about having heterosexual relations. The two activities dont quite match up and are quite opposite actually.

Then again, the most conservative judge in the nation likes a good orgy. I don't think anyone can say for certain what O'Reilly does or doesn't...

Aw, look what you're making me speculate!! :x

But still, far more icky things have been done by far more average people. As implausible as it may sound, these claims are still firmly grounded in the realm of possibility.
 
Mechagodzilla said:
Then again, the most conservative judge in the nation likes a good orgy. I don't think anyone can say for certain what O'Reilly does or doesn't...

Aw, look what you're making me speculate!! :x

But still, far more icky things have been done by far more average people. As implausible as it may sound, these claims are still firmly grounded in the realm of possibility.

Oh wow, does the insanity ever end? It seems laughter is the best defense when liberals call me the crazy, 'blinded' fool. If I claimed on some wack site that Bush had sex with a few of his college buddies I guarantee I could make this forum explode. Apparently, I could make CNN and the NYT follow suit. This sounds like something Tucker Max would write. Even then it would be one of the more alcohol filled stories of his life. Honestly people.
 
seinfeldrules said:
Agreed, it is one thing to have sexual relations with a woman. It is another thing for a man to play around with a vibrator in his a** while talking on the phone about having heterosexual relations. The two activities dont quite match up and are quite opposite actually.


the one activity you speak of has nothing to do with whether a person is homosexual or not. While I personally think it's freaky (it only serves one purpose IMHO) plenty of straight men like ....errr that sort of thing


that was extremely hard to write cuz every way I wrote it, it sounded like I was ...well ...........lets never speak of this again


that's the thing about the harassment charges: they're too freaky not to be true
 
seinfeldrules said:
Oh wow, does the insanity ever end? It seems laughter is the best defense when liberals call me the crazy, 'blinded' fool. If I claimed on some wack site that Bush had sex with a few of his college buddies I guarantee I could make this forum explode. Apparently, I could make CNN and the NYT follow suit. This sounds like something Tucker Max would write. Even then it would be one of the more alcohol filled stories of his life. Honestly people.

...but, then again, you aren't Bush's former coworker.

If there is evidence of slander, I haven't seen any yet. In fact, O'Rielly hasn't even clearly denied anything yet.
 
Neutrino said:
Thanks Neutrino. :)

I was just watching this on NBC. Apparantly, she told him to stop with the phone calls and lewd behavoir in JUNE. But she is filing the lawsuit now. Pretty ridiculous, if you ask me? Why did she wait? Wait, what is soon? Oh, the election. And what is O'Reily? Oh, a hardcore conservative Republican. I wonder if this will effect any opinions on certain political parties? *cough* :angel:

Although, to play the devil's advocate on myself, I know of a few people who have been sexually harrassed, and it is extremely difficult for them to get along and do what is right.



By the way, Stern, you never answered blahblahblah's question :|



Edit: I don't think that anyone should be saying if this is or is not true. No one but O'Reily and the victim really know for sure. And we have little to no evidence right now.
 
that's the thing about the harassment charges: they're too freaky not to be true

Stern told me he had sex with his sister, mother, then father and grandfather. Afterwards he commented on the size of their 'inheritance' and how it stacked up against his large 'inheritance'. Afterwards, he used a vibrator on himself and his children. Then they traveled to Africa and had relations with a group of monkeys. That is how the AIDs virus reached America (through Canada of course ;) ).

So is that true because they are freaky? Replace Stern with Bush and I bet I have frontpage material! Just type it up in Word and pass it off for official court documents from the 1970s (when they didnt have Word of course). I bet CBS would fall for it no problem.
 
Erestheux said:
Thanks Neutrino. :)

I was just watching this on NBC. Apparantly, she told him to stop with the phone calls and lewd behavoir in JUNE. But she is filing the lawsuit now. Pretty ridiculous, if you ask me? Why did she wait? Wait, what is soon? Oh, the election. And what is O'Reily? Oh, a hardcore conservative Republican. I wonder if this will effect any opinions on certain political parties? *cough* :angel:

Although, to play the devil's advocate on myself, I know of a few people who have been sexually harrassed, and it is extremely difficult for them to get along and do what is right.

This would be a rather complex and inately personal scheme to only maybe get a few people to vote Kerry.

I can't see how you can call O'Reilly using a dildo to be impossible, and then immediately theorise about a big leftist conspiracy instead. Occam's razor.

And if it's difficult to come forwards, that would explain why she's waited so long to come forwards, correct?
 
Erestheux said:
Thanks Neutrino. :)

I was just watching this on NBC. Apparantly, she told him to stop with the phone calls and lewd behavoir in JUNE. But she is filing the lawsuit now. Pretty ridiculous, if you ask me? Why did she wait? Wait, what is soon? Oh, the election. And what is O'Reily? Oh, a hardcore conservative Republican. I wonder if this will effect any opinions on certain political parties? *cough* :angel:

Although, to play the devil's advocate on myself, I know of a few people who have been sexually harrassed, and it is extremely difficult for them to get along and do what is right.



By the way, Stern, you never answered blahblahblah's question. :|

well she could have been consulting with lawyers. It can take months just to build a case, file charges and prepare for eventual court proceedings

refresh my memory, what was the question?
 
Mechagodzilla said:
...but, then again, you aren't Bush's former coworker.

If there is evidence of slander, I haven't seen any yet. In fact, O'Rielly hasn't even clearly denied anything yet.


O'Reilly
"As a public figure, I have received many threats," he said. "But enough is enough ... The threats stop now. I will not give in to extortion."

It seems you do your search for anti-O'Reilly stuff, but dont bother to do the opposing research

O'Reilly's lawyer, Ronald Green, said he believes there are tapes of conversations between the two and asked a court to compel Mackris to produce them so they could be played publicly.
Wow, seems guilty to me.
 
seinfeldrules said:
Stern told me he had sex with his sister, mother, then father and grandfather. Afterwards he commented on the size of their 'inheritance' and how it stacked up against his large 'inheritance'. Afterwards, he used a vibrator on himself and his children. Then they traveled to Africa and had relations with a group of monkeys. That is how the AIDs virus reached America (through Canada of course ;) ).

So is that true because they are freaky? Replace Stern with Bush and I bet I have frontpage material! Just type it up in Word and pass it off for official court documents from the 1970s (when they didnt have Word of course). I bet CBS would fall for it no problem.

I believe you. Stern is a nasty nasty monkey man!

j/k
 
seinfeldrules said:
Stern told me he had sex with his sister, mother, then father and grandfather. Afterwards he commented on the size of their 'inheritance' and how it stacked up against his large 'inheritance'. Afterwards, he used a vibrator on himself and his children. Then they traveled to Africa and had relations with a group of monkeys. That is how the AIDs virus reached America (through Canada of course ;) ).

So is that true because they are freaky? Replace Stern with Bush and I bet I have frontpage material! Just type it up in Word and pass it off for official court documents from the 1970s (when they didnt have Word of course). I bet CBS would fall for it no problem.

Too bad you're not filing a 100-page lawsuit, you have a blatant and self-professed motive for this slander, you have never met Stern, he is not a co-worker, etc, etc.

Again, in your eyes a dildo is impossible, but a massive left-wing conspiracy is simple and commonplace?
 
seinfeldrules said:
Stern told me he had sex with his sister, mother, then father and grandfather. Afterwards he commented on the size of their 'inheritance' and how it stacked up against his large 'inheritance'. Afterwards, he used a vibrator on himself and his children. Then they traveled to Africa and had relations with a group of monkeys. That is how the AIDs virus reached America (through Canada of course ;) ).

So is that true because they are freaky? Replace Stern with Bush and I bet I have frontpage material! Just type it up in Word and pass it off for official court documents from the 1970s (when they didnt have Word of course). I bet CBS would fall for it no problem.

would you try building a case on something so flimsy as that? No lawyer would take on a case on hearsay alone
 
Back
Top