seinfeldrules
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2003
- Messages
- 3,385
- Reaction score
- 0
Raziaar said:I believe you. Stern is a nasty nasty monkey man!
j/k
hahaha
Stern with his monkey buddy
Uh oh! I have proof now. It is no doubt true. :farmer:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Raziaar said:I believe you. Stern is a nasty nasty monkey man!
j/k
It was just a theory, mate.Mechagodzilla said:This would be a rather complex and inately personal scheme to only maybe get a few people to vote Kerry.
I can't see how you can call O'Reilly using a dildo to be impossible, and then immediately theorise about a big leftist conspiracy instead. Occam's razor.
And if it's difficult to come forwards, that would explain why she's waited so long to come forwards, correct?
I never said it was a 'massive left wing conspiracy'. I did say it was nuts, however. If you relate the two then I dont blame you.Again, in your eyes a dildo is impossible, but a massive left-wing conspiracy is simple and commonplace?
You're saying I couldnt write 100 pages of that? My dad was in the Air Force Natl. Guard shortly after Bush. Im sure he could make a decent story about how he and Bush were friends and exchanged stories. Finally, who knows that this woman doesnt have a motive for this slander?Too bad you're not filing a 100-page lawsuit, you have a blatant and self-professed motive for this slander, you have never met Stern, he is not a co-worker, etc, etc.
CptStern said:you're an idiot
seinfeldrules said:It seems you do your search for anti-O'Reilly stuff, but dont bother to do the opposing research
seinfeldrules said:That is such a wild, freaky thought it must be true! Man I just saw aliens land! Run to the Canadian Times stern, I have front page material. Definitely freaky enough (although no sex).
Ahhh Look at the Freaky Deaky AIDs Alien!
Well if you didnt even bother to check what O'Reilly said then dont post anything at all. Especially dont post that he didnt discredit this claim.Why in the hell would I bother to research this?
If I said that you had sex with your dad last night would you feel compelled to publically deny it? He asked the recorded tapes to be played publically.So far, O'reilly has not clearly said "I did not harass this woman" or anything of the sort. He has only opposed the fact that he has been presented with a lawsuit.
That is a good point, Stern, I'll give you that.CptStern said:well she could have been consulting with lawyers. It can take months just to build a case, file charges and prepare for eventual court proceedings
refresh my memory, what was the question?
I guess I'm more curious than he wasblahblahblah said:Curious, do you feel the same about left extremiest like Michael Moore?CptStern said:he had a field day with Clinton's escapades, hopefully someone will give him what he dishes out
I guess I'm more curious than he was
If I am, it is because I'm laughing too hard at your idea "Anything too freaky must be true".you're foaming at the mouth
Are you referring to me?Mechagodzilla said:Edit: Why am I even bothering to respond? With all this nonsense and steadfast refusal to do anything but whole-heartedly support O'Reilly, it's clear that even taped conversations would leave you speculating about how this is all a bid to slander O'Reilly for no reason.
That really isn't answering the question... but I guess I'm going to drop it now, heh.seinfeldrules said:You missed it. He called Moore a moderate. Go figure huh.
Edit: Why am I even bothering to respond? With all this nonsense and steadfast refusal to do anything but whole-heartedly support O'Reilly, it's clear that even taped conversations would leave you speculating about how this is all a bid to slander O'Reilly for no reason.
seinfeldrules said:Well if you didnt even bother to check what O'Reilly said then dont post anything at all. Especially dont post that he didnt discredit this claim.
If I said that you had sex with your dad last night would you feel compelled to publically deny it? He asked the recorded tapes to be played publically.
Erestheux said:That is a good point, Stern, I'll give you that.
But you should all read my long post on sexually harrased people
And do you really need me to "refresh your memory" if it was asked in this thread?
I guess I'm more curious than he was
Obviously O'Rielly is confident that he wasn't taped. Whether he said those things or not is still up in the air.
60 million dollars is quite a reason to me. Heh, maybe that changes from person to person. Seems like 60 million big reasons staring me in the face.All your points are only 'valid' if you immediately assume that the woman is a liar for no reason
seinfeldrules said:If he wasnt taped, then what is the evidence?!
60 million dollars is quite a reason to me. Heh, maybe that changes from person to person. Seems like 60 million big reasons staring me in the face.
Did you ignore my last two posts, Mecha? I said that was a funneh little theory. :|Mechagodzilla said:Of course I'd deny it, dumbass. All your points are only 'valid' if you immediately assume that the woman is a liar for no reason.
Obviously O'Rielly is confident that he wasn't taped. Whether he said those things or not is still up in the air.
No wait, I'm making too much sense! Maybe I was hired by the Kerry campaign and the liberal media just to publicly assume you are being a dumbass? CNN, here I come!
I think Moore has done a lot wrong, but I won't get into all of it. For one, have you heard about how he is bribing college students? I can't say I read the full article, but I got the jist of itCptStern said:would I want Moore to get as good as he gets? sure I would, if he's done anything wrong, which he hasnt ...it's not like anyones charging him with talking about sticking things up the pooper-shooter ..la la la
1/10 of that is 6 million dollars... that is a lotCptStern said:that'll come down substantially by the time it goes to court. She's lucky if she sees 1/10 of that
fudge packer Bill hehhehehhehehehheehheeh
I believe a third would go to her lawyer, the second third to the DNC (JUST KIDDING) and the last third to herself. Honestly though, she would come out of this set for life if she convinced the jury her story was true.that'll come down substantially by the time it goes to court. She's lucky if she sees 1/10 of that
Erestheux said:I think Moore has done a lot wrong, but I won't get into all of it. For one, have you heard about how he is bribing college students? I can't say I read the full article, but I got the jist of it
1/10 of that is 6 million dollars... that is a lot
Let's say she gets about 20%CptStern said:lawyers will take a fair chunk of that, and taxes will take some more
60 million dollars is quite a reason to me. Heh, maybe that changes from person to person. Seems like 60 million big reasons staring me in the face.
Erestheux said:Let's say she gets about 20%
A million+
I'd like a million dollars!
For a million dollars, yes of course I'm a capitalist!CptStern said:would you listen to Bill O Reilly as he vibrated his way to anal extacy
Can't you see that what you are saying is insane?
CptStern said:would you listen to Bill O Reilly as he vibrated his way to anal extacy
No more seindfeldrules vs. all!!
Screw it, I'm going to bed
seinfeldrules said:If I've told you once Stern, I've told you a million times, leave the monkey business in Africa.
CptStern said:you're implying a bigoted stereotype, must be the dumbass in you
seinfeldrules said:Remember, I already am the bigoted dumbass for supporting Civil Unions. Oh man this is priceless.
It was just one, little topic. Honestly though, this is the first time I have done something offensive or in any way name calling. If I'm not mistaken you've (no offense) well yes offense, have spammed a few threads out of existence. Did I call for your ban?Lil' Timmy said:no offense (actually, some offense, sure) but this forum would improve a great deal if both stern and seinfeldrules took a little 2-week ban. just, my opinion.
seriously, could you both please stfu with the flaming and uninformed partisanship? that'd be great.
Well it seems that we can agree.CptStern said:what can I say, ....he pushes my buttons mr-I-havent-been-here-in-a-long-time-and-all-of-the-sudden-I'm-mr-smartypants!!
oh sure... this is the first time you've flamed . just take some constructive criticsm like a good boy. i'm out of this thread if you have more concerns, raise them in a pm. thx.seinfeldrules said:It was just one, little topic. Honestly though, this is the first time I have done something offensive or in any way name calling. If I'm not mistaken you've (no offense) well yes offense, have spammed a few threads out of existence. Did I call for your ban?
CptStern said:what can I say, ....he pushes my buttons mr-I-havent-been-here-in-a-long-time-and-all-of-the-sudden-I'm-mr-smartypants!!
oh sure... this is the first time you've flamed . just take some constructive criticsm like a good boy. i'm out of this thread if you have more concerns, raise them in a pm. thx.
CptStern said:what can I say, ....he pushes my buttons mr-I-havent-been-here-in-a-long-time-and-all-of-the-sudden-I'm-mr-smartypants!!