Dear Abby Retardedness

Isn't that strange? That's why it's funny, but it's (to me) like somebody who seriously thinks, for example, that one and one make seven.
 
I can't believe that in this day and age...this can happen. :laugh:
 
I hate that Dear Abby crazy shit. I want to eat her SOUL.

That's too horrific to be funny :/

{Disclaimer} This post shouldn't be taken as seriously as it sounds. Induce vomiting if swallowed.
 
The last one about the teacher touching kids is really disturbing. Nasty old men.
 
Wow, I actually just clicked the link. Hah. This is not the same "Dear Abby" that we have here in my town. "My" Abby would have suggested castration to keep the child from conforming to the devils of homosexuality!
 
Yea, I told my brothers that if either of them decided to become gay that I'd kick them in the nuts to remind them what's there.
 
phantomdesign said:
Yea, I told my brothers that if either of them decided to become gay that I'd kick them in the nuts to remind them what's there.
You're a dick.
Gtfo of the internet.
 
phantomdesign said:
Yea, I told my brothers that if either of them decided to become gay that I'd kick them in the nuts to remind them what's there.

For the last time, it's not a choice. And I think you're the one who is gay, considering how insecure you seem.
 
Gayness = DNA Defect.

Source: My Science Teacher
 
15357 said:
Gayness = DNA Defect.

Source: My Science Teacher

I'm not disagreeing, but your science teacher could be wrong. You have links to any studies?
 
phantomdesign said:
Yea, I told my brothers that if either of them decided to become gay that I'd kick them in the nuts to remind them what's there.

I would hope they'd kick you in the head for the same reason.
 
askleslie.jpg
 
15357 said:
Gayness = DNA Defect.

Source: My Science Teacher

From the sounds of it, China is a more tolerant and open society than South Korea!

But South Korea isn't a threat to United States' hegemony, so you're alright.
 
15357 said:
Gayness = DNA Defect.

Source: My Science Teacher
Yes, it's connected to your genes because it effects your mental development and its proven to increase the size of an area of your brain.

However DNA defect is bullshit, being gay is a genetic variation, you see this is the modern world we live?

He lives in South Korea, Dreadlord. The republic of ignorance it seems.
 
Uh, isn't a variation of DNA a mutation and therefore a defect? Just asking here.

....... bleargh.
 
Everyone varies from having better defences against disease, being tall/short, thin/fat. Variation isn't always mutation. And some mutations can be detrimental to the body, some can help e.g. sickle cell anaemia provides immunity to malaria. But in being a homosexual, it has no detrimental effect on the body (as long as you are safe), only to society, which is what you are thinking...which is bullshit. We live in a world where homosexuality is not illegal, and is acceptable. What are you getting at?
 
Nothing really.


Nevermind everything I've said. I'm pretty much ignorant about this issue here.
 
I wouldn't insult South Korea just because some science teacher is kinda ignorant.

I would insult it for the massive amount of camel toads that they smoke there, though.
 
The detriment from homosexuality that could be seen as a defect is that homosexuals won't be procreating and forwarding the species. That is why someone may say it's a defect.
 
MiccyNarc said:
The detriment from homosexuality that could be seen as a defect is that homosexuals won't be procreating and forwarding the species. That is why someone may say it's a defect.

Seems like a good source of population control to me. The U.S. is expected to be at 420 million by 2050 (140 million more than we have now). While most of Europe is getting smaller.
 
MiccyNarc said:
The detriment from homosexuality that could be seen as a defect is that homosexuals won't be procreating and forwarding the species. That is why someone may say it's a defect.

If that were true it would have evolved itself out of existence from the very beginning. More likely it is some form of recessive gene that has some benefits society on a whole.
 
...Y'all do know that gay people are perfectly capable of normal reproduction, right? They just don't.
 
Raeven0 said:
...Y'all do know that gay people are perfectly capable of normal reproduction, right? They just don't.
Nooo, never would have guessed that :eek: :eek: :eek:
If that were true it would have evolved itself out of existence from the very beginning. More likely it is some form of recessive gene that has some benefits society on a whole.
I fail to see the benefits. And yes, it's likely that it would have evolved itself out of existence if it were genetic
I'm more likely to believe it has something to do with the child's development.
 
Solaris said:
You're a dick.
Gtfo of the internet.
I'm sure it was a joke, FFS.

15357 said:
Uh, isn't a variation of DNA a mutation and therefore a defect? Just asking here.
Everything in existance is here because of acumulations of mutations. If any mutation is a defect then we're all very defective :laugh:
 
That grandma... /me shudders

Also, yeah. I get the feeling Phantom wasn't joking :/
 
MiccyNarc said:
Nooo, never would have guessed that :eek: :eek: :eek:

I fail to see the benefits. And yes, it's likely that it would have evolved itself out of existence if it were genetic
I'm more likely to believe it has something to do with the child's development.

Well for one, we don't exactly need more people right now. Having 5% of the population not reproducing might be a good thing. It also frees up members of society for other tasks. People who don't have a familly to take care of can devote themselves to other things like science, careers. Spartan soldiers where mostly homosexual. Alexander the Great was gay. Maybe if he kids he wouldn't have been able to go about conquering the known world. Homosexuality has been around for thousands of years, it's not likely that it's some recent result of bad parenting.
 
Wouldn't the ancients technically be bisexual since they had sex with their wives for reproduction?
 
DeusExMachina said:
Wouldn't the ancients technically be bisexual since they had sex with their wives for reproduction?
Don't forget the naughty Romans that touched boys
 
There is no such things as being Bisexual....You're either gay or straight but willing to have sex with the other gender.
 
Geogaddi said:
There is no such things as being Bisexual....You're either gay or straight but willing to have sex with the other gender.

Thanks for that bit of enlightenment, sir! Surely you know of all the wonders of the universe! Please school me, oh great one!

Or, f*ck off. Whichever.
 
Actually he's correct there. :O

The wide majority of bi people are biologically straight. They are simply capable of enjoying same-sex too, without hang-ups.
 
Back
Top