Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Kamikazie said:I think all of our lives would be pointless and mundane if you were permabanned Ikerous.
:ESamon said:Speak for yo self.
Sometimes I get the impression that you don't love meSamon said:Speak for yo self.
Samon said:Lately you've grown on me.
A what? I don't believe I have ever heard these words...Ennui said:warning system
This isn't a complete democracy. It's on the contrary a dictatorship, we just happen to be mostly benevolent. I believe in being absolutely fair, but reasonably so.15357 said:Nat Turner was banned because he had conflicting morals and opinions with the rest (most) of us. I'm torn between right to opinion and keeping order and public morality by squashing dissent with permabans.
bbson_john said:On topic:
Permanent Bani seem to be over rigorous. They have no difference with sentencing a person to death. You ban a person, you banished a person. He can neither come back nor make contact with others. In fact, people in this forum may impulsively break the rule, probably because of immaturity. They are not truly evil or that bad. If the administrators ban that person permanently, he will have no chance to either reflect himself or make an appeal, let alone redeem himself. Society itself is already cruel, let not make thyself be cruel too.Always give people a chance.
Unless a person does a great harm to the forum, like hijacking, I will not support banning any one, no matter I knew him or not.
Most of the bans are justified and I support them, but on occasion one of us bans someone permanently for reasons that don't really warrant it. Samon tends to ban people just for being noobs (see the HL2 discussion forums, admittedly they're annoying but they don't really know better) because he feels it improves the site quality. I agree with that and don't really mind, but it's not technically all that fair. Danimal is a little heavyhanded with bannings for spam and whatnot; and last but not least I tend to get overemotional and worked up and ban people. Usually they deserve it, but not all the time (the whole OvA thing for instance I now feel bad about).Erestheux said:Maybe you don't like perma bans, Ennui, but I don't see too many mods going crazy with the perma ban stick...
Mm. Right.Samon said:I don't often dish out the perma ban to noobs, more of an extended stay from the site so that they forget about it and don't come back.
Generally, I only ban them if they are being stupid, because whilst most noobs are just that, noobs, others come to simply annoy and know when they are being idiots. These people, I ban. Ennui is absolutely right in saying I believe in site quality. It is unfair, and it is a little over zealous. Oh well!
He didn't stop? He had 8 posts. A troll without a doubt? I have mine. It looks to me like he's just a younger kid. He deserved a warning, and perhaps a temp ban eventually, but only after a little while.Samon said:Dog93, was without a doubt, a born and bred troll. I'm sorry, but nobody is that silly, or plain stupid. http://www.halflife2.net/forums/showthread.php?t=105403
Take a good look. Nobody is that silly. Nobody! He was out of control, he just kept posting threads, bumping old threads - he just didn't stop. So he was temp banned - that is fair enough. He was lucky I didn't click perma ban.
You might not frequent the HL2 discussion forums much, but I do, and alot of other people would rather than be spammed into an oblivion of nothingness by a madman. He was temp banned so that he might just learn his mistake. No pansy pm was going to teach him anthing