Fiberawptic
Newbie
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2008
- Messages
- 557
- Reaction score
- 2
The Demo is pretty close to what we will be getting, and from the videos,reviews and what i have played the original is better.
The reviews of the final version criticises the same problems the demo version has.
The graphic are worse is this, no parallax mapping which the first had, dynamic lighting severely reduced from the first,Physics dumbed down you can no longer mess around with ragdolls,particle effects are reduced as well, and the same blurry texture as the first are still used.The game is to easy, the first one was a real challenge on normal while this is a breeze on normal, why are enemies highlighted in slow mo.
This is not a PC game like the first, this is a Console game and is no way a true squeal from what i've seen to Fear. The devs admitted to using the 360 as the leading platform and using COD as inspiration and as such it doesn't play true to how i feel and others feel about Fear.
Name me one game where the demo is significantly different from the retail version?
The game has gone gold and looking on their forums there was no way they have fixed any of the problems in the short amount of time.Even then i don't think they will fix most of them. Why remove quick save, why no support of additional mouse buttons why the letterboxing on the PC version.
Thank god i cancelled my pre-order, i was gonna waste ?25 on this pile of shit. Which is a shame as Fear is one of my all time favourite FPS, i've played it more times than HL.
Ok well, there are no 'final' reviews on the game yet because its not out with the exception of PC Zone UK and maybe one other company that reviewed it, which is just 2 sites...
Also, you say its a console game, not a pc game. You realize it is comming for PC as well? Where have the developers said they used COD as inspiration? Its smells like bull, but it may be true (source?). If anything, Monolith always talks about how FEAR 2 was still influenced by Japanese horror like the original but they just expanded on things that were pretty limited and lacking in the original, such as design, levels, and creatures.
No, i can't name a game where the demo is quite different than the final release, because there is none. When i said the game might be improved after the demo, i was talking about all the small annoyances people seem to only talk about, such as the letterbox, hud, framerate issues. Those all are pretty small and can be easliy fixed. Not a lot of people have said the game is just overall bad, with a few exceptions...
So it sounds like you think they went too run-n-gun with the sequel, but lets not forget the original was very much the same way. I remember how much attention it received for its gunplay even more so than its horror elements. Which was great, because FEAR wasn't just a game offering awesome shooting effects, nor was it a game with only horror, its combined the two perfectly. With FEAR 2, they were able to take both to a whole new level.