Final Fantasy on PC?

I thought 7 and 8 and 12 were the only ones to come out on PC (that's VII, VIII and XII)
 
Yeah, and they were all better on the Playstation. FF is a console RPG and should rmeain so until it changes its formula drastically enough to warrant a move to the PC.
 
12 ain't coming to PC, Jintor?
You must mean 11?
As in XI, not XII?
 
VictimOfScience said:
Yeah, and they were all better on the Playstation. FF is a console RPG and should rmeain so until it changes its formula drastically enough to warrant a move to the PC.
FF's awsomness does not depend on platform imo.
 
2Fast4U said:
FF's awsomness does not depend on platform imo.
Yes, they are definitely great games (until X), but the controls and hours and hours of level-grinding and random battling are better suited for consoles that's all. You don't usually encounter that sort of thing (to that extent) in PC rpgs.
 
VictimOfScience said:
Yes, they are definitely great games (until X), but the controls and hours and hours of level-grinding and random battling are better suited for consoles that's all. You don't usually encounter that sort of thing (to that extent) in PC rpgs.
Not true. Just buy a gamepad for $40. They all steal the layout from the PS2 controller anyway. I played through FF8 on an emulator on my PC using a gamepad.
 
StardogChampion said:
Not true. Just buy a gamepad for $40. They all steal the layout from the PS2 controller anyway. I played through FF8 on an emulator on my PC using a gamepad.
I am just more used to the relatively mindless level-grinding being left to the consoles and couches. Mind you, I love Dragon Warrior 8 (to cite an example) and its ridiculous amount of this sort of thing, but I don't know why anyone would play it on a PC, unless of course, they didn't have a console, but what manner of RPG gamer doesn't have a console as well?!
 
VictimOfScience said:
I am just more used to the relatively mindless level-grinding being left to the consoles and couches.
Know you not that the king of mindless level-grinding is the PC-dominated MMORPG genre?
 
That first link, is the link to the expansion for the MMORPG FF 11.

That means that it is NOT the first. In fact 7 was I believe.
 
OCybrManO said:
Know you not that the king of mindless level-grinding is the PC-dominated MMORPG genre?
Yes, but the MMORPG era came long after the mindless level-grinding on the NES and so on. Of course, its quite possible that you are too young to remember those good old days, but they are certainly fondly-remembered by me.
 
OMGROFLE.

I got FF7 for the PC back in like 98. I remember trying to play it on my mom's Pentium 2 166Mhz before I knew what video card was.

I'm like WTF graffix. :laugh:
 
VictimOfScience said:
Yes, but the MMORPG era came long after the mindless level-grinding on the NES and so on. Of course, its quite possible that you are too young to remember those good old days, but they are certainly fondly-remembered by me.
Does the NES (which I remember vividly) having some games with grinding make the current console games have more grinding than PC MMORPGs? No. It changes nothing. Arcades used to be where everyone went to play games... but that has no effect on the demise of the arcade in the current market. The past is not the present. The current situation is that PC MMORPGs completely destroy the modern console RPGs in terms of the amount of grinding. They don't even have to have deep, interesting stories to make keep people doing the grinding and paying the monthly fees... the players entertain themselves with guilds, PvP, collecting items, etc. MMORPGs are like shallow, boring, multiplayer cousins of console RPGs where you have to make your own fun.
 
I thought FF7 translated fantastically to PC, getting rid of all those nasty jaggies and making the summon graphics all slicktacular.

Horribly optimised though - a game that your toaster could run, yet some mid level PCs (for that time) used to struggle with it. I don't know why they never bothered converting 9 and 10, you know they'd sell.
 
OCybrManO said:
MMORPGs are like shallow, boring, multiplayer cousins of console RPGs where you have to make your own fun.
Hahaha! I agree! MMORPGs are shallow and boring realms where you must make your own fun! The devs don't have to be too bothered with it. Console RPGs give your player character more of a sense of purpose and direction and involvement with the story.

And the level-grinding in the Dragon Warrior and Final Fantasy series is unmatched in terms of work and payoff when you consider all of the completely unnecessary and extra-tough bosses and dungeons. Just accept it.
 
Console RPGs give your player character more of a sense of purpose and direction and involvement with the story.

And the level-grinding in the Dragon Warrior and Final Fantasy series is unmatched in terms of work and payoff when you consider all of the completely unnecessary and extra-tough bosses and dungeons. Just accept it.
Accept what? As for most of that post, that's basically the stuff I've been saying for a while now. The only part I disagree with is the ludicrous claim that modern Final Fantasy games require more work than MMORPGs. You must be joking... because that would require stringing together several Final Fantasy games. For example, I beat Final Fantasy X in less than a week... whereas I played World of Warcraft twice as often for like three months straight before I finally quit (they recently added more to the game)... and I left WoW with very little satisfaction. Near the end, the grinding between levels was almost taking as much time as some whole games. You keep thinking there will be something to reward all the work you put into it... but when you get to the top you think, "I wasted all that time for this?"
 
OCybrManO said:
Accept what? As for most of that post, that's basically the stuff I've been saying for a while now. The only part I disagree with is the ludicrous claim that modern Final Fantasy games require more work than MMORPGs. You must be joking... because that would require stringing together several Final Fantasy games. For example, I beat Final Fantasy X in less than a week... whereas I played World of Warcraft twice as often for like three months straight before I finally quit (they recently added more to the game)... and I left WoW with very little satisfaction. Near the end, the grinding between levels was almost taking as much time as some whole games. You keep thinking there will be something to reward all the work you put into it... but when you get to the top you think, "I wasted all that time for this?"
What rewards do you get with MMORPGs? Where's the end? What's the point? I guess if you think of MMORPGs in the same way you think of Counter-Strike, then I suppose its virtually endless entertainment, albeit sometimes repetitive entertainment. I dunno. Enjoy your grinding--however you get it done! :cheers:
 
VictimOfScience said:
Yes, but the MMORPG era came long after the mindless level-grinding on the NES and so on. Of course, its quite possible that you are too young to remember those good old days, but they are certainly fondly-remembered by me.
Eh? I'm 13 and remember those days.
 
VictimOfScience said:
Yeah, and they were all better on the Playstation. FF is a console RPG and should rmeain so until it changes its formula drastically enough to warrant a move to the PC.

FFXI was 30x better on PC than console.

And I own FF7 for the PC and liked it alot because it improved the graphics. Granted now-a-days I can't play it because of compatability issues, but when it was initially released it ran fine.
 
Homless Snark said:
FFXI was 30x better on PC than console.

And I own FF7 for the PC and liked it alot because it improved the graphics. Granted now-a-days I can't play it because of compatability issues, but when it was initially released it ran fine.
What do you have that is causing FF7 to not run for you? Your sound card not support midi or something? :laugh:

As far as the discussion here, I cannot stand mmorpg level grinding. I started and stopped with Diablo 2, and I never completed LoD. That has to be the most boring shit I have ever experienced.

Chrono Trigger on the other hand, I've put well over 200 hours into over the past 10 years and I still don't feel done. I imagine I'll put another 20 on this year for the sake of unlocking what goodies (beastiary, etc) are left in the PSOne version.
 
_Z_Ryuken said:
What do you have that is causing FF7 to not run for you? Your sound card not support midi or something? :laugh:

As far as the discussion here, I cannot stand mmorpg level grinding. I started and stopped with Diablo 2, and I never completed LoD. That has to be the most boring shit I have ever experienced.

Chrono Trigger on the other hand, I've put well over 200 hours into over the past 10 years and I still don't feel done. I imagine I'll put another 20 on this year for the sake of unlocking what goodies (beastiary, etc) are left in the PSOne version.

Well I assumed most people would have knowledge, but I guess not.

Now that my pc is all nice n tricked out, then it becomes a problem to play older games because older games were not meant to run. Ever try playing a DOS/C&C/X-Com game again on your new PC? Dos you need special programs most likely, command and conquer has to run in a certain "OS mode", and X-Com runs fine, but runs at lightning speed.

Little things like that where your PC is either to awesome for an old game. FF7 for the PC has horrible support for anything better than Windows 98, 2000/SE/XP have issues trying to run it.
 
Hm I'll have to check that out. I can't remember if I've ever ran it on XP. No reason it shouldn't work.

I'm fully aware of Dos incompatibilities and the like. I'm no fool. But no, the oldest game I have is Descent 2, so I have never tried to run Dos/C&C/X-Com.

I did however run a Dos based MAME without any trouble.
 
God damn, RPG keep sucking me in to the point where I'm no longer proficiant with FPS's. Damnit.

And simulations as well.

And I meant FFXI, sorry.
 
Trivia!

The first Final Fantasy that WAS going to be released, was rather bizarrely Final Fantasy V. Back in the SNES days, IV was released as II and they dawdled on Vj so long that they ended up releasing VI as III and promising V as a later PC release called "FF X-treme", in conjunction with Eidos. It never happened, and VII was indeed the first PC release, followed by VIII. IX didn't make it, because interest in an Playstation port by the year 2001 was pretty low (much the same reason as why X-Treme never happened either). X didn't make it because the PCs of the day would have been too challenging for a notoriously lazy developer like Square to port to. XI did because MMORPGs have traditionally been a PC thing.

This all may be clearer in the following article, which I wrote when not a little drunk: http://www.ps2fantasy.com/files/articles/51/
 
And as much as I know about... uh... uh...
 
_Z_Ryuken said:
That's impressive FF knowledge. You must know as much about FF as I do about Street Fighter.
Depends. If you know about recent Street Fighter games, your knowledge exceeds mine :) I'm no fan of what has happened this decade for Final Fantasy, and I've simply lost interest...
 
kupoartist said:
Depends. If you know about recent Street Fighter games, your knowledge exceeds mine :) I'm no fan of what has happened this decade for Final Fantasy, and I've simply lost interest...
I am a hardcore SF fanperson.

As for FF, I quit after X-2, though I've never actually played through anything after VII. I've got FF:CC for GC, but man, it is so lame.
 
I saw a piroted version of either FFXIII or FFXIV in russia for pc.(every game in russia is piroted).
 
Back
Top