CptStern
suckmonkey
- Joined
- May 5, 2004
- Messages
- 10,303
- Reaction score
- 62
"...acclaimed science fiction author Orson Scott Card published in Compute! Magazine on what is needed in a good computer game
Anyway, back in '83, Card made a list of what he expects from a great computer game. By his own admission, they are high standards. He points to one company fulfilling all of that and more, however. Can you guess which it is?
1. A home computer game should not be designed to minimize playtime - it should not be designed to take away quarters by making the game impossible to beat.
2. It should use the full power of the computer - it should do things that only the computer can do well, and it should use all the appropriate resources the computer provides.
3. It should be an excellent game, not just excellent programming - the play itself should be exciting and not serve merely as an excuse to show off the programmer's expertise.
4. Above all, the game should be designed so the player controls and, to some degree, creates the game as he plays - I have little patience with games that play me, forcing me to follow only one possible track or learn one mechanical skill if I hope to win.
If those requirements sound like what you want, too, I have good news for you: there are finally some software companies making a serious effort to create exactly this kind of game.
answer (highlight to view):
"The software firm Electronic Arts has added a fifth requirement for itself: The game must be truly original. No Donkey Kong or Pac-Man clones in this group, of games. Even though each of their games has roots in gaming traditions, the object has not been to recreate a favorite board game, or duplicate a sport, or translate an arcade game"
the irony motherload
http://www.atarimagazines.com/compute/issue42/gamesgrowup.php
Anyway, back in '83, Card made a list of what he expects from a great computer game. By his own admission, they are high standards. He points to one company fulfilling all of that and more, however. Can you guess which it is?
1. A home computer game should not be designed to minimize playtime - it should not be designed to take away quarters by making the game impossible to beat.
2. It should use the full power of the computer - it should do things that only the computer can do well, and it should use all the appropriate resources the computer provides.
3. It should be an excellent game, not just excellent programming - the play itself should be exciting and not serve merely as an excuse to show off the programmer's expertise.
4. Above all, the game should be designed so the player controls and, to some degree, creates the game as he plays - I have little patience with games that play me, forcing me to follow only one possible track or learn one mechanical skill if I hope to win.
If those requirements sound like what you want, too, I have good news for you: there are finally some software companies making a serious effort to create exactly this kind of game.
answer (highlight to view):
"The software firm Electronic Arts has added a fifth requirement for itself: The game must be truly original. No Donkey Kong or Pac-Man clones in this group, of games. Even though each of their games has roots in gaming traditions, the object has not been to recreate a favorite board game, or duplicate a sport, or translate an arcade game"
the irony motherload
http://www.atarimagazines.com/compute/issue42/gamesgrowup.php
