For those of you that don't learn...

Status
Not open for further replies.
gh0st said:
Wow the HUGE FONT of this post has made me not give a shit at all about foxtrot! Who would have guessed it was that easy?!

Glad that's sorted. :rolleyes:

Now, back to normal HL2.net discussion.
 
Do you guys think that the mods might have decided to have Foxtrot killed?

I think they might have put a hit out on him.
 
gh0st said:
Seems like you are the only one in this thread who cant handle that joke. Most of the other people seem to have seen the obvious.

Now you're being ridiculous. I highlighted an example of the abuse/swearing. If I called you a **** and then said it was a joke, does that make it ok?

I could care less about the "real" problems, since they are typically ignored anyway. Your complete disrespect for the people in this thread and, frankly, pompous attitude make it hard to take you seriously.
Then that's your problem, not mine.
For some reason I get the feeling that you made this post not because you particularly care about any of the hetairia debates but more to posture.
You're entitled to your opinion.

If you honestly think most of the other stuff is any better thats laughable. When was the last time you've seen a thread grow like the first hetairia one. People are curious about it, but NO! NO real discussion here! We arent big boys and cant handle the dirty language! We only allow world news posts and stupid movies here!

Curiosity is fine. Threads descending into flames, abuse and outright spam aren't, and those have always been the rules. Or should we make it different just because it's a subject you want to participate in?
 
Foxtrot was trolling, trolling means warnings after that ban.. and warnings he had, so now he's banned. its so easy, why is everyone thick about it?
 
gh0st said:
Wow the HUGE FONT of this post has made me not give a shit at all about foxtrot! Who would have guessed it was that easy?!

I think I also don't care about Foxtrot or Heitaria anymore. Pi Mu Rho is a gifted social engineer; he gave us this thread to bury our frustrations and so far it has worked brilliantly.
 
xLostx said:
You'd think that with the amount of users that think the perma ban was unfair and everyone wanting him back that maybe, just maybe they could change the perma ban to something a little shorter maybe a month or so but I still think the ban was/is bullshit and perma banning a member like foxtrot is ludacris.

so 5 or 6 people out of how many want him back? Not that this is a democracy, but surely you can see the imbalance here.

Also, the rules are that clone accounts will get you permbanned. If we drop that just because Foxtrot is a "senior member" then what kind of message are we giving then?
 
Dgenatron said:
I think I also don't care about Foxtrot or Heitaria anymore. Pi Mu Rho is a gifted social engineer; he gave us this thread to bury our frustrations and so far it has worked brilliantly.
Dgen I <3 you and all...but you spelled Hetairia wrong in your sig. :p
 
EVIL said:
Foxtrot was trolling, trolling means warnings after that ban.. and warnings he had, so now he's banned. its so easy, why is everyone thick about it?

Because maybe if we all group together, and wish on a shooting star whilst clicking our heels he'll magically become unbanned!

There's a slight possibility that would happen if a lot of members and enough mods wanted him back. Given that the community is pretty divided on this, and the mods are unanimously against Foxtrot being unbanned, the chances are pretty slim.
 
EVIL said:
Foxtrot was trolling, trolling means warnings after that ban.. and warnings he had, so now he's banned. its so easy, why is everyone thick about it?
Because not everyone agreed it was trolling, and even if it is thought so, it's not essentially trolling as much as being annoying. Trolling is Deathseeker. Have you ever seen his threads that come about besides the Princess Jen ones? Foxtrot posting heitaria things is silly and annoying maybe, and if he properly warned in PM's he probably deserves a month or so ban.

Permanently banning him, however, was a very dumb choice, as he's proven to be a great contributor to site discussion. It just makes more people unhappy and rather than improving the forum at all, all it did was make things worse.
 
Pi Mu Rho said:
Now you're being ridiculous. I highlighted an example of the abuse/swearing. If I called you a **** and then said it was a joke, does that make it ok?

Curiosity is fine. Threads descending into flames, abuse and outright spam aren't, and those have always been the rules. Or should we make it different just because it's a subject you want to participate in?
Actually you highlighted an example of flaming...
Flaming != swearing :/, and he was obviously joking, so yea, it makes it alright (By most people's standards atleast...)

And like he said.. you were the one flaming :/ Not us

Pi Mu Rho said:
If we drop that just because Foxtrot is a "senior member" then what kind of message are we giving then?
That you're subjective and reasonable?
 
Pi Mu Rho said:
Now you're being ridiculous. I highlighted an example of the abuse/swearing. If I called you a **** and then said it was a joke, does that make it ok?
con·text (kŏn'tĕkst')
n.
The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning.
Then that's your problem, not mine.
:rolleyes:
Curiosity is fine. Threads descending into flames, abuse and outright spam aren't, and those have always been the rules. Or should we make it different just because it's a subject you want to participate in?
You're right.
Starmonkey said:
Foxtrot is banned for legitimate reasons - if anyone has a problem with it then speak to me. No more public threads about this matter or hetairia please (that's not really a request)
Seems like it wouldnt have really mattered how civil we are about it. Since we are NOT to discuss it.
 
Pi Mu Rho said:
so 5 or 6 people out of how many want him back? Not that this is a democracy, but surely you can see the imbalance here.

Also, the rules are that clone accounts will get you permbanned. If we drop that just because Foxtrot is a "senior member" then what kind of message are we giving then?

I have an idea, make an exception.
 
I haven't really been paying attention to the whole Foxtrot business (nor is it high on my list of concerns). What were the names of the clone accounts (or account)? Also, what did he use them/it for? Were there any warnings? If I don't know that information I'm not going to comment on it either way. If you don't want to say... don't. I'm just curious.
 
Pi Mu Rho said:
so 5 or 6 people out of how many want him back? Not that this is a democracy, but surely you can see the imbalance here.

Also, the rules are that clone accounts will get you permbanned. If we drop that just because Foxtrot is a "senior member" then what kind of message are we giving then?
That people can be reconciled and that rules serve as guidelines not the have-all-end-all. Oh really, 5 or 6 people? Lets make a poll and see what number that is multiplied by. Oh wait, we arent allowed to discuss it. Damndest thing.
 
I'm not gunna drop it until something is done. Either the mods can go on a crazy banning streak and remove the "trouble makers" or they can bribe me....PM me for paypal info, thx.
 
:dozey: I know, what the hell happened with Foxtrot? This heitaira? WTF? I thougth Foxtrot was a nice dude. Played BF:2 with the fella, he is one angry player though... but he's cool.
 
Ikerous said:
Actually you highlighted an example of flaming...
Flaming != swearing :/, and he was obviously joking, so yea, it makes it alright (By most people's standards atleast...)

And like he said.. you were the one flaming :/ Not us

I was flaming?


That you're subjective and reasonable?
Or, that breaking the rules is perfectly ok if you have a high postcount?
 
Pi Mu Rho said:
I was flaming?
You were the one calling us idiots and stupid for no reason. You conveniently left that out of your responses to one of my posts.
Or, that breaking the rules is perfectly ok if you have a high postcount?
Put yourself in his shoes, if you are capable of that. If somebody banned you for a mistake after putting a lot of time into this crumbling community you would be pretty peeved I would think, yeah?
 
I was flaming?
You called us morons and idiots.. so yea

Or, that breaking the rules is perfectly ok if you have a high postcount?
See, thats not how most reasonable ppl see it at all...
(And how is banning someone for x weeks showing that something is perfectly ok?)
 
gh0st said:
con·text (kŏn'tĕkst')
n.
The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning.

Really, don't patronise me.

:rolleyes:

You're right.
Seems like it wouldnt have really mattered how civil we are about it. Since we are NOT to discuss it.
and why do you think that is? because we are sick of all this constant hetaria/anti-hetaria crap. And yet here we are, several threads later.
Fine, you don't like Foxtrot being banned. Regardless, you have to live with it. Publicly discussing it isn't going to change anything. As Starmonkey very clearly stated - PM him if you want to discuss it.
 
Pi Mu Rho said:
Or, that breaking the rules is perfectly ok if you have a high postcount?

People make mistakes (ie: even you), give him a break.
 
Ghost really...give it up.

Oh and yes you are idiots and stupid.Also foxtrot ain't coming back.
 
I move to have Pi banned. kthx.

*mysteriously disappears after this comment*
 
xLostx said:
I move to have Pi banned. kthx.

*mysteriously disappears after this comment*

That would be unfair, he's clearly just drunk.
 
Pi Mu Rho said:
Fine, you don't like Foxtrot being banned. Regardless, you have to live with it. Publicly discussing it isn't going to change anything.
It's forum politics... it's interesting and effects us
Under that logic, theres no neeed for anyone to ever discuss politics
 
gh0st said:
You were the one calling us idiots and stupid for no reason. You conveniently left that out of your responses to one of my posts.

If you think that was applying to you, then what can I say?
I can only treat it, after several posts saying no more threads on this subject, and several warnings, the continued creation of threads on this subject, as stupid and moronic behaviour.

Put yourself in his shoes, if you are capable of that. If somebody banned you for a mistake after putting a lot of time into this crumbling community you would be pretty peeved I would think, yeah?
Yes I would. But I would also have been remarkably stupid to have deliberately and knowingly broken the rules, and would therefore have deserved what I got.
 
... on a totally off topic note, a few minutes ago i look at this thread and there's 12 replies. Now i look at it and it's seven pages long.

now it consumes me.

Tr0n said:
Well ain't this some shit.
 
Pi Mu Rho said:
I can only treat it, after several posts saying no more threads on this subject, and several warnings, the continued creation of threads on this subject, as stupid and moronic behaviour.
XD Oooh, so its okay for you to call me a moron because you THINK I am
But if you didn't, then it'd be wrong. Makes sense to me.
 
Members should be treated differently depending on there status here, not there post count. For example.

Random newbie comes here and acts like a bastard, no one knows him and no one cares if he leaves, an outright ban wont have tons of members on you saying it was unjust.

If VERY long-term member like Fottrott, desides to jump up and make a stand about somthing very stupid, in the process making a new user thus breaking a rule - Talk to him, or ban him for afew months at the most, he SHOULD be treated with abit more respect, not because his post count is high, but alot of members know him and have come to like him, its like having a pet for a year, then suddenly the pet has a little accident on the carpet so you douze him in cerosine and let the ****er burn, hardly fair for pet.
 
Ikerous said:
It's forum politics... it's interesting and effects us
Under that logic, theres no neeed for anyone to ever discuss politics

Except you've been asked several times to not discuss it.
 
Pi Mu Rho said:
If you think that was applying to you, then what can I say?
I can only treat it, after several posts saying no more threads on this subject, and several warnings, the continued creation of threads on this subject, as stupid and moronic behaviour.

Yes I would. But I would also have been remarkably stupid to have deliberately and knowingly broken the rules, and would therefore have deserved what I got.

Words of advice for Pi MU Rho:

Don't take it personal
 
Ikerous said:
XD Oooh, so its okay for you to call me a moron because you THINK I am
But if you didn't, then it'd be wrong. Makes sense to me.

It was aimed at those that have acted like morons. Are you one of those?
 
Dgenatron said:
Words of advice for Pi MU Rho:

Don't take it personal

Words of advice for Dgenatron:

Don't assume that I am.
 
Pi Mu Rho said:
It was aimed at those that have acted like morons. Are you one of those?
Does that make a difference...?
You were still implying that it's okay for you to call people morons, because to you, they were acting like morons.
 
Pi Mu Rho said:
If you think that was applying to you, then what can I say?
Makes no difference who you applied it to. Calling other members names is "name calling", one of the reasons these threads dont last. Like I care if you called me stupid, but you calling people morons then saying we cant call people names is utterly hypocritical.
But I would also have been remarkably stupid to have deliberately and knowingly broken the rules, and would therefore have deserved what I got.
I bet it's easy for you to say that from your position of safety. Fact is you've broken the rules as well by calling us morons. I have as well. So are you going to ban both of us just because we broke rules that make no difference? Come on, we dont bend the rules around here. Ban yourself for calling us morons, ban me for.. something, i'm sure you could find something easily enough.
 
I'm surprised he hasn't banned/warned any of you yet.

Also iccy...you are a moron.You thought clarky's toaster was some device he created. (from clark's lifter thread) :D <3
 
Burn said:
Members should be treated differently depending on there status here, not there post count. For example.

Random newbie comes here and acts like a bastard, no one knows him and no one cares if he leaves, an outright ban wont have tons of members on you saying it was unjust.

If VERY long-term member like Fottrott, desides to jump up and make a stand about somthing very stupid, in the process making a new user thus breaking a rule - Talk to him, or ban him for afew months at the most, he SHOULD be treated with abit more respect, not because his post count is high, but alot of members know him and have come to like him, its like having a pet for a year, then suddenly the pet has a little accident on the carpet so you douze him in cerosine and let the ****er burn, hardly fair for pet.
Exactly the point I've been trying to make in the entire thread, but people just make thread replies with big text or repeated "FOXTROT IS PERMA BANNED HE WONT COME BACK!!111one"
 
*Watches her post get lost in the mists of time as the thread is spammed to living hell*

Bye bye post.
 
Burn said:
*Watches her post get lost in the mists of time as the thread is spammed to living hell*

Bye bye post.
On the contrary, I gave it a big QFT
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top