Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
:frown: explain yourself, heretic!Laivasse said:Durst is pond scum but the only moron in that particular vid is Reznor.
Laivasse said:At the risk of being buried under an avalanche of NIN-fan wrath, it's my opinion that any musician who whines about fans 'stealing' their music needs a sharp smack in the mouth.
one of the greatest things you've ever saidCptStern said:reznor is a genius
?gick said:That was pretty funny, but not as funny as his porn video.
I do not understand one aspect in the light of the reznor interview though, if Durst is in it for the money, why doesn't he protest against napster and Kazaa, how come Reznor dislikes it more?""I come out of this cocoon now into a climate where things have changed, and it hasn't in my opinion been for the better. Today, musicians are complimented much more on their business plan than their talent. When I see an idiot like Fred Durst [of Limp Bizkit] spouting off about, 'I'm in it for the money, buy my record, buy two copies of it, I'm going to be the best business man, I'm just doing this till I get into movies' -- [he should] sell dish-washing liquid or something. It's damaged music. I don't mean him personally, but this climate has created a very unhealthy situation to spawn new creative acts."
Yes but if durst is in it for the money why would he not care that people are pirating his music. Besides that why would reznor be against it, his music is not one that you can easly pickup, his is mostly benefited from the fact that the threshold for listening to his music is lower because people do not need to diss out 15,- for a cd they may not like, and thus will take more chances. The internet has probably drasticly increased his audiance and introduced his him to people who oitherwise would not have ever heard of him.Ennui said:Reznor dislikes Durst because he's into it for the money, for the business, and he cares too much about that and not enough about the music. Reznor is in it for the music, but he doesn't like people stealing his music either.
And thus, Fred Durst is a moron.Gray Fox said:Yes but if durst is in it for the money why would he not care that people are pirating his music.
But if you apply those same standards to Reznor that wouldn't make him that smart either.Stigmata said:And thus, Fred Durst is a moron.
By what justification? Trent's being pretty straightforward on it.Gray Fox said:But if you apply those same standards to Reznor that wouldn't make him that smart either.
Well the sharing of music probably benefits him more then it hurts him, so isn't it stupid to be against it.Ennui said:By what justification? Trent's being pretty straightforward on it.
how did you arrive at THAT conclusion?Gray Fox said:Well the sharing of music probably benefits him more then it hurts him
Like I said before. NIN isn't a band that is played a lot on radio or TV, NIN songs can take time to grow on you and take time to really appreciate. Because of the internet you can get the songs for free, hence are more likely to take chances listening something you normally wouldn't, or just because a friend mentioned it to you. A lot of those people will buy the CD if they like it or go to NIN concerts.Ennui said:how did you arrive at THAT conclusion?
Fred Durst of Limp Bizkit said, "the only people worried about [Napster] are really worried about their bank accounts," and has agreed to participate in a free nationwide concert tour to generate support and encouragement for Napster.
Trent seems to have done reasonably well for himself without decent radio/TV play. He's basically infamous, and lots of people will snap up NIN albums on name only.Gray Fox said:Like I said before. NIN isn't a band that is played a lot on radio or TV, NIN songs can take time to grow on you and take time to really appreciate. Because of the internet you can get the songs for free, hence are more likely to take chances listening something you normally wouldn't, or just because a friend mentioned it to you. A lot of those people will buy the CD if they like it or go to NIN concerts.
No disagreement from me on that, I mean NIN has a cult following. But still it seems like this helps him more then it hurts him, he will definatly survive without it, but this way a lot more people get to appreciate him, and buy his CD's.Stigmata said:Trent seems to have done reasonably well for himself without decent radio/TV play. He's basically infamous, and lots of people will snap up NIN albums on name only.
Hmm. Point taken. But this argument is essentially moot, since Trent wasn't "speaking out" against music downloading, he was simply agreeing that downloading music = stealing. He's no Metallica.Gray Fox said:No disagreement from me on that, I mean NIN has a cult following. But still it seems like this helps him more then it hurts him, he will definatly survive without it, but this way a lot more people get to appreciate him, and buy his CD's.
Gray Fox said:No disagreement from me on that, I mean NIN has a cult following.
Gray Fox said:Well the sharing of music probably benefits him more then it hurts him, so isn't it stupid to be against it.
CptStern said:reznor is a genius ..
mortiz said:I wouldn't go that far..
Zeus said:When Johnny Cash covers your song, you know you're the shit.
mortiz said:The interview about Napster was in 2000, maybe he's changed his opinions on it since then. It's a tough one to call, because like has been said, I'm willing to bet people have bought Reznor's albums based on what they've downloaded, and all of the hardcore NIN fans would have just bought his album anyway. So I don't think piracy affects Reznor that much, in fact, it may even help him.
I've been in enough debates about file-sharing to be thoroughly sick of them, but let's be clear here: it's copyright infringement, not theft. You may personally consider copyright infringement to be a form of theft, but since the issue of whether or not it constitutes an actual loss to the artist is a bit of a grey area - the BPI have enjoyed record album sales for the past few years after all - it is a bit of a stretch to say that anything has been 'stolen' from the original owner.Ludah said:He said so himself in the video that he doesn't want to sound like the rich guy wanting to get richer, but it is theft nonetheless. That's undeniable. Wether or not such theft actually hurts or somehow benefits the artists in question is another matter.[/i]
Ludah said:No, no, I pretty much agree with everything you said.
it's an all-encompassing thing.SearanoX said:I just listened to some Nine Inch Nails for the first time and was not really impressed. It sounded like techno-rock-pop with spoken vocals everywhere. It was just... mediocre. I'm not sure where the genius is.
It really depends on which song you listened to, and your current tolerance for abrasive music. It's kind of an acquired taste. So if you're not really into the harder sounds, you should try listening to Right Where It Belongs, All The Love In The World, or Into The Void. Those are a lot softer, you might like them more.SearanoX said:I just listened to some Nine Inch Nails for the first time and was not really impressed. It sounded like techno-rock-pop with spoken vocals everywhere. It was just... mediocre. I'm not sure where the genius is.