Guns shooting through walls ?

hmm, how come you cant hurt yourself with it when you fire it whilst standing infront of a wall then..?? unlike the floor.
 
Well, I wouldn't know about the floor...

But from memory, the bouncing is based on the angle...
 
Brian Damage said:
Well, I wouldn't know about the floor...

But from memory, the bouncing is based on the angle...
I wouldn't say 'bouncing', I would say 'reflecting'.
 
hm, it's the same with the atmosphere and space shuttles.
only in the right angle they can go throug else the bounce off or burn to ashes.
 
Brian Damage said:
Picky picky...

I'd actually say maybe rebounding or ricocheting...
Bouncing is like, a basketball.
 
Tadashi said:
Does a ray of energy reflect?

havent you ever watched Batman!??!? All you need is a mirror!
 
It's not a laser, it's a particle beam.

And now that I come to think of it, most of my physics textbooks use bounce and reflect interchageably anyway...

How about deflect?

Tadashi: It depends upon the form the energy takes.
 
Like the thing they use in Star Trek? I think the name is deflector(name used in Germany).
 
Brian Damage said:
How about deflect?
Hmmm.

To turn aside or cause to turn aside; bend or deviate

To cause to turn aside; to bend; as, rays of light are often deflected.

To turn aside; to deviate from a right or a horizontal line, or from a proper position

Looks like deflect means more like bending.
 
vegeta897 said:
Hmmm.

To turn aside or cause to turn aside; bend or deviate

To cause to turn aside; to bend; as, rays of light are often deflected.

To turn aside; to deviate from a right or a horizontal line, or from a proper position

Looks like deflect means more like bending.

its bending when referring only to light

but when, for example, you "bend" a bullet (deflecting) you are "bending" the path of trajectory.
 
Six Three said:
its bending when referring only to light

but when, for example, you "bend" a bullet (deflecting) you are "bending" the path of trajectory.
But the bullet does not leave the surface at the exact but opposite angle, because it has an actual shape, not like a beam. And a particle beam more or less acts like a laser, it produces light and heat and is uneffected by gravity and probably travels at the same speed.
 
It is actually affected by gravity... so is a laser beam, however slightly.

I'd say, though, in this case the Particle beam is acting more like what it is: A bunch of very small, fast objects hitting a solid surface and bouncing off.
 
vegeta897 said:
And a particle beam more or less acts like a laser, it produces light and heat and is uneffected by gravity and probably travels at the same speed.

Light and Particle beams are affected by gravity! jeez, havent you ever seen how a black hole affects light?
 
Brian Damage said:
It is actually affected by gravity... so is a laser beam, however slightly.

I'd say, though, in this case the Particle beam is acting more like what it is: A bunch of very small, fast objects hitting a solid surface and bouncing off.
Although in reality it wouldn't. It would damage it, like it damages the player.

EDIT: I know they are slightly affected by gravity, but I didn't bother to say that.
 
And a particle beam doesn't travel at quite the same speed a laser beam travels at, either...
 
I forgot what we were arguing about...
 
Brian Damage said:
And a particle beam doesn't travel at quite the same speed a laser beam travels at, either...
Ok, whatever, we clearly have nothing to talk about.

Someone think of something, quick!!
 
vegeta897 said:
Although in reality it wouldn't. It would damage it, like it damages the player.

Only if it hit it head on or at a deep angle. Which is what happens in the game: It drills right through. If it hits at a shallow angle, then the same thing happens to it as happens to a bullet or anything else when it hits an angled surface: The principle of deflection. I saw a really good demonstration of it using the Apache helicopter's angled cockpit windshield.
 
Six Three said:
err....ahhh.....paper...or....plastic?
Ahhhh, yes... good topic... ummm. Plastic... Make a poll!

EDIT: Hey! I had the 100th post in this thread! :p
 
ok, according to my calculations - based largely on empirical penetration equations - there is no infantry rifle in existence that will perforate 6" mild homogeneous steel. The largest standard calibres that I could find were the standard 0.50" and 20 mm recoilless rifle ammunition. To take worst case, I assumed they were armour piercing (regular ball or explosive ammunition would barely penetrate). FYI, 20 mm AP ammunition would be defeated by, as a conservative maximum, about 5 cm steel (that's less than 2.5" for you yanks). I don't know where you got your figures from, but 6" steel is clearly ridiculous - you'd be lucky to defeat it with cannon fire.
 
Back
Top