Half-Life myths that need to DIE

Portal IS set in the Half Life universe, the possibility of Chell appearing is there, however I believe a Valve employee said that, "we have no games currently including Shepard but we would like to come back to him." Or something along those lines, I could be wrong though. However Chell and Aperture Science, Portal and GLadOS are set around the same time as the current story arc. Episode two even mentions Aperture Science. They do exist within the series universe and are heavily connected, that is a definite. :)

:cheers:

kk thx, I wasn't exactly sure on their connectivity, I thought is was more of a seperate game, like TF
 
kk thx, I wasn't exactly sure on their connectivity, I thought is was more of a seperate game, like TF

Sorry for reiterating myself so many times in one post but I wanted to make it absoloutely clear. :)
 
1. G-man is NOT Gordon, vice versa. For one, it would make NO sense at all. For two, Gordon's eyes are green, g-man's are blue. For 3, g-man is the name of the MODEL, not the character. The character does not have a name. Also, Valve isn't going to leave any blatantly obvious clues in the series for us to figure out who/what g-man is before the big reveal... that would completely ruin the motivation to keep following the story. SO STOP BRINGING IT UP!!!!!
No duh.

2. There is no cat. There's no cat model... there's not cat ghost... there is simply NO CAT. The dialog about the cat was for laughs. It was to simply carry on the notion that Kleiner is somewhat of an absent minded professor. Any time Barney brings it up, it's just to carry on the gag. I'll say again... THERE IS NO CAT!!!!!!
There was a cat, we just don't know what happened to it. Probably died. Saying that there is no cat just because it doesn't appear in the game is just silly. The 7-hour war didn't appear in the game either.

I don't think there's anything particularly important about the cat, but I definitely think it existed.

3. The original Half-Life was made long before the story or any of the characters in Half-Life 2 were ever even conceived. This is why there are about 50 Kleiners, Barneys, Elis and Magnussons. They were not important characters in Half-Life 1, just disposable generic ally models. Therefore, nothing you find in Half-Life 1 is purposefully foreshadowing any of the events in HL2. The picture in Gordons locker? That might be his niece. Or his daughter. Or his baby sister. Remember, Gordon started out as Ivan the Space Biker... I don't think Valve ever intended to take the story in the direction they took it. That picture is not Alyx. Alyx did not exist when HL1 was made.
Yes and no, mostly yes. I agree that Gordon and a less-developed Barney were the only characters that really existed in HL1 and were brought into HL2. I think Laidlaw probably did have some bigger picture idea on the G-Man and a reason for Xen to be like it was (i.e. some inklings of the Combine, not fully formed ideas). It's good practice for a writer to have a more fully developed world and story than makes it into the final work. I appreciate it anyways, it makes thing richer and more consistent.

Oh, and btw, there is NO evidence to support the idea that Chell from Portal will play a role in Episode 3. GlaDOS probably will, as well as the Portal device, but for all we know, Chell is dead.
Dead wrong. Gabe has said that Chell would interact with existing HL2 characters and become important to the story. He didn't mention Episode 3, but at some point in the future, she'll be back.
 
Ok, then what do you propose we call him?

Also, you might wanna tell this to Gabe Newell and Mark Laidlaw, who both keep using the incorrect term 'gman' in interviews, just in case they don't know they're doing it wrong.

gabe.jpg
 
Hey, how about you all ****ing READ before you start acting like asshats?

I didn't say the cat never existed. I said it's NOT IN THE GAME and never was. Comprehension...

Shepard was put into Stasis by g-man so he couldn't hurt anyone and nobody could hurt him. He may come back... but tying him into the story line would be stupid.

When did Gabe say Chell would be back? Before or after Episode 2 was released? Before or after Alyx was supposed to fall from the bridge and g-man told her she wasn't supposed to be here and to forget about it all? Before or after we were going to have to drive the jalopy?

Either way, for what reason would Chell have to travel to the Borealis? Are we to assume that there was only one portal device ever created, and that Chell became some all knowing rebel and took the portal device into the arctic with her to keep the technology safe? Or is it more likely that Alyx and Gordon will discover the portal device on the abandoned Borealis and that it'll play an important part in escaping the ship as it's sinking?

It seems like any character that ever had anything to do with Half-Life, you people want to exist in HL2. Why? Don't you want to see something NEW, or are you addicted to nostalgia? Fine, in that case, let's bring back the 2 women from Decay. Let's bring back Barney's boss from Blue Shift (bearing in mind that Barney, much like g-man, was only a nickname given to the character after the game was created). I want to see bull squids, hound eyes, vortigaunt controllers, the large blind tentacle things, snarks, gargs, baby head crabs, etc etc etc... bring it ALL back!!!! We don't want NEW characters, Valve, we want you to rehash every single minor character for not other reason than to make us feel nostalgic for the days of old.
 
See, at first I agreed with you. But now you're just being a fucking pissant.
 
See, at first I agreed with you. But now you're just being a fucking pissant.

You try having a bunch of people jump on YOUR case just because they can't take a moment to read and comprehend the purpose for a particular thread.
 
I didn't say the cat never existed. I said it's NOT IN THE GAME and never was. Comprehension...
You said "There is no cat," and seemed to think you made a point. Perhaps you've just heard theories that the cat is in the game and I haven't. I think everyone here is in agreement that there is no cat in the game.

Shepard was put into Stasis by g-man so he couldn't hurt anyone and nobody could hurt him. He may come back... but tying him into the story line would be stupid.
No story is stupid until it's had a chance to be told. That said, I don't think there are any plans to bring Shepard back. Or Race X.

When did Gabe say Chell would be back? Before or after Episode 2 was released? Before or after Alyx was supposed to fall from the bridge and g-man told her she wasn't supposed to be here and to forget about it all? Before or after we were going to have to drive the jalopy?
Sometime around October 22. After. After (although that was just a trailer). After.

Either way, for what reason would Chell have to travel to the Borealis? Are we to assume that there was only one portal device ever created, and that Chell became some all knowing rebel and took the portal device into the arctic with her to keep the technology safe? Or is it more likely that Alyx and Gordon will discover the portal device on the abandoned Borealis and that it'll play an important part in escaping the ship as it's sinking?
I make no presumptions about the story. I specifically avoided saying we'd actually see Chell or that she would be in Episode 3, since I've never heard those things. What I've heard, in a video recorded interview with Gabe, is that Chell would be important to the Half-life story and would interact with existing HL2 characters.

It seems like any character that ever had anything to do with Half-Life, you people want to exist in HL2. Why? Don't you want to see something NEW, or are you addicted to nostalgia? Fine, in that case, let's bring back the 2 women from Decay. Let's bring back Barney's boss from Blue Shift (bearing in mind that Barney, much like g-man, was only a nickname given to the character after the game was created). I want to see bull squids, hound eyes, vortigaunt controllers, the large blind tentacle things, snarks, gargs, baby head crabs, etc etc etc... bring it ALL back!!!! We don't want NEW characters, Valve, we want you to rehash every single minor character for not other reason than to make us feel nostalgic for the days of old.
Barney was the model name. Barney Calhoun was officially named in Blue Shift. Reviving the old doesn't prevent seeing something new. The Hunters and poison antlions were new. The radar was new. Magnusson was a new character, developed from a stub of a character we met in HL1. References to earlier in the story are good, because they create a sense of unity. Given the vast difference in setting between HL1 and HL2, threads to connect the stories help make the whole much more cohesive.
 
You said "There is no cat," and seemed to think you made a point. Perhaps you've just heard theories that the cat is in the game and I haven't. I think everyone here is in agreement that there is no cat in the game.

It's quite clear to me that you pretty much stopped reading at the point where I said "There's no cat" because I KNOW I explained what I was saying, I literally said "the car does not physically (or supernaturally) manifest itself anywhere in the game". Yes, there have been people (these 10 year old noobs) asking about a hidden cat character model, or talking about Lamar really being that cat, or talking about the cat stalking Barney through the game.

No story is stupid until it's had a chance to be told. That said, I don't think there are any plans to bring Shepard back. Or Race X.

Shepard's story was a minor side story with an entire secondary race of aliens. That entire game was CLEARLY just a secondary vision of Half-Life. You start including ANOTHER main characters back story involving the resonance cascade, and you will make the current story arc a complete mess. Shepard in Episode 3? Very, very unlikely. But Gabe did say that HL isn't going to end at Episode 3...

Sometime around October 22. After. After (although that was just a trailer). After.

Link to exact quote?

I make no presumptions about the story. I specifically avoided saying we'd actually see Chell or that she would be in Episode 3, since I've never heard those things. What I've heard, in a video recorded interview with Gabe, is that Chell would be important to the Half-life story and would interact with existing HL2 characters.

I'm still going to assume he's speaking of a new Portal game.. it'd be strange for Chell to all of the sudden gain a voice. Same with Shepard. Barney was different because he already had a voice and they took it away for Blue Shift.

Barney was the model name. Barney Calhoun was officially named in Blue Shift. Reviving the old doesn't prevent seeing something new. The Hunters and poison antlions were new. The radar was new. Magnusson was a new character, developed from a stub of a character we met in HL1. References to earlier in the story are good, because they create a sense of unity. Given the vast difference in setting between HL1 and HL2, threads to connect the stories help make the whole much more cohesive.

Yeah, they named him Barney because of a similar appearance to Barney Fife. I guess maybe it wasn't AFTER the game was made, more likely during, but whatever, point is... And no, reviving the old doesn't prevent seeing something new, but honestly, how much shit do you want CRAMMED into an 6 hour game? You'll be so busy being introduced to Chell, to Shepard or whomever else, you'll have little time to focus on the task/story at hand.

Maybe I shouldn't say Valve WON'T do this... instead, I should say that I trust Valve not to absolutely DESTROY the game by doing this. I think they know better than to jump the shark like that, as it were.
 
So what precisely is the problem with compiling a list of all the ridiculous theories that need to be laid to rest, as was my original intent when I made this thread?

It would serve as a reference for the noobs, something you could link to when one of them posts another retarded theory.

Which you didn't do. That would've been a good idea, if you hadn't immediately started "having a go" at every "noob" out there. Do you not recall the time when you were once a young teenager, enthralled by such universes created by our wonderful benefactors, Valve? I'm sure you had plenty of ideas floating around. And no doubt, being the arrogant young teen you were, you put some of those forth yourself, thinking only of yourself, and your own ideas.

So why not show a little more respect for the youngsters, not shouting and cussing at them, but providing them with understanding, knowing that it is not there fault per se, rather than being utterly hypocritical.

OMG Adrian Shepard is going to be in Borealis!

Who said he won't. Just because you don't see him, doesn't mean he's not there.

...despite the fact that Shepard isn't a Valve character

Incorrect. Shephard was not created by Valve, but he's still a Valve character.

and not only that, but the g-man didn't suspend him in stasis temporarily, he put him there without the intent of releasing him... "a place where no harm can come to you and you can do no harm to anyone" is what I think he said.

Who are you to question the G-man's motives?

Furthermore, how would it be so that we'd have 2 or more unspoken main characters in the same game? This is why I don't think Chell will be in Episode 3, and part of the reason why I'm certain we'll never hear of Shepard again.

I agree with you in the fact that I don't believe Chell will play a part in Episode 3, but that is not to say that you or I are right.
As has been quoted, Valve want to introduce Shephard back into the game, because they know the fans liked him. Barney (an unspoken character!) was introduced into the game back in Half-Life 2! So who's to say that Adrian won't be there. And moreover, it might simply be that he's only introduced as another expansion to the story.

Hey, how about you all ****ing READ before you start acting like asshats?

At this point I stop wanting to read them. Flaming has a definition, and I believe you're are starting to venture into that region.

Comprehension...

Quite comprehend you.

Shepard was put into Stasis by g-man so he couldn't hurt anyone and nobody could hurt him. He may come back... but tying him into the story line would be stupid.

You said this already.

And why would tying him into the story be stupid? They did it once before.

Before or after Alyx was supposed to fall from the bridge and g-man told her she wasn't supposed to be here and to forget about it all? Before or after we were going to have to drive the jalopy?

WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU!?

I believe CAPS are necessary when bringing to someone's attention their lack of SPOILER tags. Therefore, I have added them for you. We haven't all played Episode Two, and there are some people who wish to reserve some bits of information to the game.

Either way, for what reason would Chell have to travel to the Borealis? Are we to assume that there was only one portal device ever created, and that Chell became some all knowing rebel and took the portal device into the arctic with her to keep the technology safe? Or is it more likely that Alyx and Gordon will discover the portal device on the abandoned Borealis and that it'll play an important part in escaping the ship as it's sinking?

Where did anyone mention Chell?

It seems like any character that ever had anything to do with Half-Life, you people want to exist in HL2.

On this point I half agree with you. There are many people out there who say they want some random dude "back" just because they enjoyed them. Unfortunately, they do not realise that too much of a good thing can lead to well... boredom. There are certain items which should be left where they are, and Valve, creators and masters of this very game we are discussing, quite understand what they're doing.

Why? Don't you want to see something NEW, or are you addicted to nostalgia?

Yes, that's why some people mention turning the gravity gun into an smg... *shakes head in shame at idea*, however people do get nostalgic.

Fine, in that case, let's bring back the 2 women from Decay. Let's bring back Barney's boss from Blue Shift

Oh, yeah, and let's bring back the Nihilanth! Both ideas are just prepostorous, and no-one ever suggested them. The first, however might have some potential. People do get nostalgic over many things, unfortunately they do come up with some ridiculous ideas. If, as was said before, you want to critisize them, critisize them face to face. Don't just generalise.

bearing in mind that Barney, much like g-man, was only a nickname given to the character after the game was created.

No, it was a nickname given to the character as the game was created. Are you denying that Barney is his name?

I want to see bull squids, hound eyes, vortigaunt controllers, the large blind tentacle things, snarks, gargs, baby head crabs, etc etc etc... bring it ALL back!!!! We don't want NEW characters, Valve, we want you to rehash every single minor character for not other reason than to make us feel nostalgic for the days of old.

You're being ridiculous. No one suggested this, and there really aren't that many threads that suggest bringing back stuff. No matter how annoying they are, Valve aren't going to listen to them, so just accept them for being irritating inconveniences for now. If you want, flame them in their thread, but don't generalise.

You try having a bunch of people jump on YOUR case just because they can't take a moment to read and comprehend the purpose for a particular thread.

I believe it is you who fails to read and comprehend many threads across these boards. You appear to dislike HalfLife2.net, and yet you are still here.

Go away.

It's quite clear to me that you pretty much stopped reading at the point where I said "There's no cat" because I KNOW I explained what I was saying, I literally said "the cat does not physically (or supernaturally) manifest itself anywhere in the game". Yes, there have been people (these 10 year old noobs) asking about a hidden cat character model, or talking about Lamar really being that cat, or talking about the cat stalking Barney through the game.

So? They're noobs, let them be.

Shepard's story was a minor side story with an entire secondary race of aliens. That entire game was CLEARLY just a secondary vision of Half-Life. You start including ANOTHER main characters back story involving the resonance cascade, and you will make the current story arc a complete mess. Shepard in Episode 3? Very, very unlikely. But Gabe did say that HL isn't going to end at Episode 3...

It was a different vision, yes, but it was very inspirational in understanding how Half-Life worked, and the story behind it. While it might not be Shephard who is involved, they could still create some form of expansion which might answer so many questions. Who are you to decide that someone can't be in Valve's games? I'm starting to consider you being Satan or something similar.


I'm still going to assume he's speaking of a new Portal game.. it'd be strange for Chell to all of the sudden gain a voice. Same with Shepard. Barney was different because he already had a voice and they took it away for Blue Shift.

Do you not recall the HECU's speaking?? Chell didn't have a voice... wonder why... who the hell would she speak to??

You'll be so busy being introduced to Chell, to Shepard or whomever else, you'll have little time to focus on the task/story at hand.

And you think that one extra character is too much to handle...? I believe Valve made a job well done of introducing an old character into Episode Two.

[QUOTEMaybe I shouldn't say Valve WON'T do this... instead, I should say that I trust Valve not to absolutely DESTROY the game by doing this. I think they know better than to jump the shark like that, as it were.[/QUOTE]

I hope they do. Because you'll go away.
 
Where do I start on this one? Such a large post, almost seems a waste of time to dissect the whole thing just for you to ignore the context of what I'm saying as you've done constantly since I began posting.

Which you didn't do. That would've been a good idea, if you hadn't immediately started "having a go" at every "noob" out there. Do you not recall the time when you were once a young teenager, enthralled by such universes created by our wonderful benefactors, Valve? I'm sure you had plenty of ideas floating around. And no doubt, being the arrogant young teen you were, you put some of those forth yourself, thinking only of yourself, and your own ideas.

So why not show a little more respect for the youngsters, not shouting and cussing at them, but providing them with understanding, knowing that it is not there fault per se, rather than being utterly hypocritical.

My thread was created to list HL myths that had already been beaten to death, yet continue to be brought up by noobs. Nobody continued the thread, they instead decided to jump on me because I'm new to the forum, completely disregarding the first couple sentences that free 90% of you from scrutiny.

Who said he won't. Just because you don't see him, doesn't mean he's not there.

So, we're going to have a GHOST of an HL character now? Borealis is going to be haunted by ShepHard (forgive me for spelling the name wrong oh wise one), Dr. Breen, or maybe even FROHMAN?

Incorrect. Shephard was not created by Valve, but he's still a Valve character.

:|

...So when Valve buts Electronic Arts... that will make all EA games characters now Valve characters? Oh, I see. You just buy the rights to something and all of the sudden it's your intellectual property.

Who are you to question the G-man's motives?

Who are YOU to question ME? WTF.. you're sitting there telling me not to give the noobs a hard time for coming up with ideas, then you're telling me not to come up with ideas of my own. Go to hell.

I agree with you in the fact that I don't believe Chell will play a part in Episode 3, but that is not to say that you or I are right.
As has been quoted, Valve want to introduce Shephard back into the game, because they know the fans liked him. Barney (an unspoken character!) was introduced into the game back in Half-Life 2! So who's to say that Adrian won't be there. And moreover, it might simply be that he's only introduced as another expansion to the story.

If I wanted to dispel myths about Chell or Shephard I would've listed them in the original post. The only thing I said about Chell was that there's no evidence to support the idea that she'll be in Ep3. Why did I bring that up? Because of all the people talking about "When Gordon meets Chell, WHEN he meets Chell in Episode 3" etc. If you're not guilty of this, you have no reason to think on it.

At this point I stop wanting to read them. Flaming has a definition, and I believe you're are starting to venture into that region.

Yeah, because everybody else has been perfect little angels toward me.

And why would tying him into the story be stupid? They did it once before.

Valve didn't once before. Gearbox did. Sure, neat story line... but like I said, how many story lines do you want to intersect on a single game?

WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU!?

I believe CAPS are necessary when bringing to someone's attention their lack of SPOILER tags. Therefore, I have added them for you. We haven't all played Episode Two, and there are some people who wish to reserve some bits of information to the game.

No, WTF is wrong with YOU? That part isn't in Episode 2, it was in the ORIGINAL TRAILER for Episode 2 and completely removed. Therefore, not a spoiler!!! NOT A SPOILER!

Where did anyone mention Chell?

WTF are you on now? We were JUST TALKING ABOUT HER


On this point I half agree with you. There are many people out there who say they want some random dude "back" just because they enjoyed them. Unfortunately, they do not realize that too much of a good thing can lead to well... boredom. There are certain items which should be left where they are, and Valve, creators and masters of this very game we are discussing, quite understand what they're doing.

Indeed.

Yes, that's why some people mention turning the gravity gun into an smg... *shakes head in shame at idea*, however people do get nostalgic.

Nostalgia is cool. It was neat finding the old HEV Charger panel in HL2. It's fun whenever Black Mesa is mentioned.

Oh, yeah, and let's bring back the Nihilanth! Both ideas are just prepostorous, and no-one ever suggested them. The first, however might have some potential. People do get nostalgic over many things, unfortunately they do come up with some ridiculous ideas. If, as was said before, you want to critisize them, critisize them face to face. Don't just generalise.

Clearly, you're not very familiar with sarcasm.

No, it was a nickname given to the character as the game was created. Are you denying that Barney is his name?

AS it was created, whatever, the point is that Barney was not conceived as part of the Half-Life story line, merely given the nickname due to his appearance and goofiness. Gordon was once Ivan the Space Biker, you know...


You're being ridiculous. No one suggested this, and there really aren't that many threads that suggest bringing back stuff. No matter how annoying they are, Valve aren't going to listen to them, so just accept them for being irritating inconveniences for now. If you want, flame them in their thread, but don't generalise.

SARCASM

I believe it is you who fails to read and comprehend many threads across these boards. You appear to dislike HalfLife2.net, and yet you are still here.

Go away.

I don't dislike the site. In fact, if any of you had taken the time to read and really think about my first post... none of this would've come about. But, instead, you choose to rush headlong into an argument for no other reason than to flex your arrogance and feigned intelligence. Maybe it is you who should go away, at least for a little while. You know, take a break from the internet for a while, learn how to interact with people in real life... etc.

It was a different vision, yes, but it was very inspirational in understanding how Half-Life worked, and the story behind it. While it might not be Shephard who is involved, they could still create some form of expansion which might answer so many questions. Who are you to decide that someone can't be in Valve's games? I'm starting to consider you being Satan or something similar.

You're putting words in my mouth. I said "no Shephard in Episode 3". I did not say "No Shephard ever again for the rest of the eternity of video-game-dom."

You're considering me as Satan, are you? Wow, I'm utterly amazed at how little it takes for you to compare a person to the definition of evil.

I argued with you on the internet, so now I'm satan?

Tell me... just HOW old are you?


Do you not recall the HECU's speaking?? Chell didn't have a voice... wonder why... who the hell would she speak to??

GlaDOS. But the story line wasn't written that way. Tell me... how would it work for Chell to be silent in Portal... talk in Episode 3... and silent again in another Portal game? Sure they COULD do it... but you know Valve, they'd see a problem in that.

And you think that one extra character is too much to handle...? I believe Valve made a job well done of introducing an old character into Episode Two.

No, one extra character is NOT too much to handle, one extra story line is. Magnusson doesn't have a huge back story, his is pretty much parallel to Kleiners, and he was previously just a generic scientist, therefore he doesn't require much of an explanation. Shephard would.

I hope they do. Because you'll go away.

Again, you are the epitome of maturity.
 
Where do I start on this one? Such a large post, almost seems a waste of time to dissect the whole thing just for you to ignore the context of what I'm saying as you've done constantly since I began posting.

I have taken the time to read every post you made, and yet you still continue to critisize me for an idea you have in your head that you haven't.

My thread was created to list HL myths that had already been beaten to death, yet continue to be brought up by noobs. Nobody continued the thread, they instead decided to jump on me because I'm new to the forum, completely disregarding the first couple sentences that free 90% of you from scrutiny.

As I said in my previous quote, you didn't. You were the first to go on the offensive, when you could've prevented this situation from arising by being resonable and friendly. The idea behind it was a perfectly logical one, if not a very good one. If you'd gone about this in a different way, a benevolent, omniscient mod might've even gone about stickying it for you, forever engraved as a warning for all noobs entering this forum.

So, we're going to have a GHOST of an HL character now? Borealis is going to be haunted by ShepHard (forgive me for spelling the name wrong oh wise one), Dr. Breen, or maybe even FROHMAN?

For one who accuses me of ignorance, you don't seem to understand my sentences. Shephard was never encountered by Gordon Freeman in Half-Life, and while there are a few appearances of Freeman to Shephard, Freeman himself never sees Shephard. So similarly in Episode Three, it might be the case that there is an unseen motive behind many things which are then resolved when you play as Shephard in an expansion to Half-Life 2, showing you how Shephard did stuff. For all you know, it might've been Shephard who "put the clock on the trainstation".

And no, I'm not critisizing you for spelling it wrong, merely pointing out that if you want to argue about Half-Life and call me ignorant, at least do so with the right spelling.

...So when Valve buts Electronic Arts... that will make all EA games characters now Valve characters? Oh, I see. You just buy the rights to something and all of the sudden it's your intellectual property.

Play the expansion packs again. Valve's logo is quite evident, showing you that clearly Adrian and Barney are both Valve's intellectual property, and similarly you could say, so is Rosenburg.

Valve backed Gearbox, helping them through the modding with the storyline, and thus they do, essentially, own the intellectual property of Valve already. Opposing Force and Blue Shift are both in canon, unlike any of the other mods produced. It wouldn't be the case if they weren't, but Valve have stated that they are. So Adrian is as likely to appear as Barney (except for the fact he's been "removed" from the storyline).

Who are YOU to question ME? WTF.. you're sitting there telling me not to give the noobs a hard time for coming up with ideas, then you're telling me not to come up with ideas of my own. Go to hell.

From all the argument and speculation around about the Gman, it is evident that the Gman's motives are not entirely clear. I was not telling you not to theorise, but merely stating that while you can state that Shephard is "out of the picture", we don't really know what the Gman wants, and how far he is going to go to get it. So, for all we know, he might want Adrian back.

Yeah, because everybody else has been perfect little angels toward me.

As has been stated, you were the first to go on the offensive. While I can find "noobs" irritating, I still find them almost cute, and a necessity to the community, and thus I am going to go on the defensive for them. Capitalised words like "DIE" and calling people ridiculous are both considered offensive.

Valve didn't once before. Gearbox did. Sure, neat story line... but like I said, how many story lines do you want to intersect on a single game?

Already covered - Valve backed Gearbox in their story.
And in a single game, for Valve to successfully intersect every canon storyline, I would put everything down and worship them as the supreme masters of Gaming. It's not easy to do, so it won't be done, and I wouldn't want to see it done, if it was done badly, but somehow, I'm sure, if they wanted to, they could. Blue Shift already has been intersected, and was done in Half-Life 2. So that just leaves Shephard and Chell. Personally I believe Shephard, as an old character, already stated to be Canon has a greater probability of being included into any further developments than Chell who has only a few references to the Half-Life storyline.

WTF are you on now? We were JUST TALKING ABOUT HER

I meant, who first brought her up?

AS it was created, whatever, the point is that Barney was not conceived as part of the Half-Life story line, merely given the nickname due to his appearance and goofiness. Gordon was once Ivan the Space Biker, you know...

Was once the Space Biker. Became Gordon Freeman before release. As did Barney. The fact is that at the release, Barney was Barney and Gordon was Gordon. Eli and Kleiner were never conceived as part of the storyline, and yet they became part of it anyway, after Half-Life was created. Barney was originally the nickname, but the point is that Barney is called Barney, and that is his name.

Clearly, you're not very familiar with sarcasm.

SARCASM

Thank you for the link, very useful indeed. I was merely being sarcastic back at you. Read the latter sentence.

I don't dislike the site. In fact, if any of you had taken the time to read and really think about my first post... none of this would've come about. But, instead, you choose to rush headlong into an argument for no other reason than to flex your arrogance and feigned intelligence. Maybe it is you who should go away, at least for a little while. You know, take a break from the internet for a while, learn how to interact with people in real life... etc.

Again, you are the epitome of maturity.

The fact I don't have internet at home, I take quite personally.
The fact that you brought an insult concerning my own life outside HL2.net isn't too mature in itself.

"Rushing headlong" was something that you chose to do at the start of this thread.

You're considering me as Satan, are you? Wow, I'm utterly amazed at how little it takes for you to compare a person to the definition of evil.

I argued with you on the internet, so now I'm satan?

Heh, no, merely an idea I had in my mind. And image of Valve in the heavens and you arguing against it. Was funnier in my head. Didn't call you Satan.

Tell me... just HOW old are you?

Age has little to do with this conversation. The fact you brought it up shows a little arrogance on your part.

GlaDOS. But the story line wasn't written that way. Tell me... how would it work for Chell to be silent in Portal... talk in Episode 3... and silent again in another Portal game? Sure they COULD do it... but you know Valve, they'd see a problem in that.

I don't believe Portal will ever have a sequel. It was a game more designed for an idea. A different way of thinking. It was created to make you think... with portals. I really think people should stop considering it as entirely canon with the Half-Life universe until Valve state that it is, or include it entirely into their plot.

No, one extra character is NOT too much to handle, one extra story line is. Magnusson doesn't have a huge back story, his is pretty much parallel to Kleiners, and he was previously just a generic scientist, therefore he doesn't require much of an explanation. Shephard would.

Again, Barney was originally a generic security guard, but he was developed into a character. And yet he still appeared in Half-Life later. As did the vortigaunts, your previous all-time enemy. A HECU appearing would not need too much explaining.


At this point we're arguing about the theories themselves, rather than the cause of this argument, that started at the beginning of this thread. I think this thread has served its purpose, and will not develop much. The idea behind it, however, should not be lost, and I'll get back to you when it's done.
 
I don't see how people keep coming to this stupid conclusion that Gearbox content doesn't apply or is somehow not owned by Valve.

When you start up the games, you see the Valve logo. Gearbox was given permission by Valve to operate within their IP. They did so with the guidance of Marc Laidlaw (ensuring that they couldn't do whatever the hell they wanted) and it had to receive Valve's seal of approval. Gearbox was hired out to create more HL content simply because Valve was preoccupied with their sequel. Everything is owned by Valve.

Remember Condition Zero? Remember how many developers Valve yanked it from due to concerns of quality? The same thing could have happened to Gearbox if the expansions weren't up to snuff. They are allowed to do this because, again, they are the owners of the IP.

Anything Gearbox made can be (and has been) used by Valve if they ever feel they want to. This ranges from the nuking of Black Mesa, to Barney's name, to Race X. If you really have such confusion about this, go email Valve and see what they have to say about it.
 
Wouldn't it be so awesome if Alyx and Chell had a cat fight over you (Gordon)?.

:]~
 
I don't see how people keep coming to this stupid conclusion that Gearbox content doesn't apply or is somehow not owned by Valve.

In the Mark Laidlaw vault, he says, "I wasn't very close to the creation of the expansion packs, and much more concerned with how to move the story forward and open up the universe; so I only take the games created by Valve into consideration when I am working on the story."

Most people probably interpret that and similer responses to mean that they are not canon.
 
The issue of Gearbox content being canon is a wholly different one from it being owned by Valve.

There are definitely things like Race X that have this strange limbo status. They might be irrelevant or they might not be canon outright. In the end, the two states are pretty much the same: They're not taken into consideration. But regardless of whatever they want to do with the content, it is still rightfully theirs. So if in the future they feel like they might want to implement it if they think it makes for a good story or if they find good use for the characters, they're entirely able to do so.

In a nutshell, IP ownership is a complete non-factor when discussing their canonicity.
 
NEW THEORY!!!!

Gman is gabe!

Or maybe valve will eventually let everybody know about it, when the time is right for it.
 
*waits*

Congrats on 50 posts.

Unless you can find a post earlier than mine, I claim intellectual property of Gabe being the G-man :D
Thanks..

To be honest with you (cuz im just like that) i dont really care, you can have that theory. I've never seen you say it, and i dont care either way.
Im not here to compete with somebody that lives of tea and crumpets:naughty:
 
Thanks..

To be honest with you (cuz im just like that) i dont really care, you can have that theory. I've never seen you say it, and i dont care either way.
Im not here to compete with somebody that lives of tea and crumpets:naughty:

Oh yes you are. You're only here to take my post and use it for your own manipulative ways!! :sniper:

But seriously... other topic created...
 
Fine work! It should be stickied! and putting all the shit aside, i agree with what you have said so far:cheers:
 
Fine work! It should be stickied! and putting all the shit aside, i agree with what you have said so far:cheers:

You mean in this thread? Anything specific? So I can write it on my "things to repeat" list.
 
You mean in this thread? Anything specific? So I can write it on my "things to repeat" list.
Ill try to be serious and say, this thread and the thread you just made or whatever.

*waiting for some smart ass comment*
 
though your right about the cat ive been thinking....
what if the cat he was talking about was a cat with a headcrap attached to it?
a Headcrab Cat Zombie?
make sense?

A cat with a headcrab attached to it? That would make it a Zombat right? Get it? Zombat? Oh forget it....(Lame reference to when Alyx coins the term 'Zombine')
 
Russian Roulette Anyone???


I can't do ASCII art coding on the forums!!!!!!:sad:
 
NEW THEORY!!!!

Gman is gabe!

Or maybe valve will eventually let everybody know about it, when the time is right for it.

read conversation before your postage, we already discussed this... IT IS NOT TRUE!!!
 
Im not here to compete with somebody that lives of tea and crumpets:naughty:

Racism is not welcome here!!! Now go play russian roulette or play in traffic or something else safe and fun like a good little boy!!!
 
read conversation before your postage, we already discussed this... IT IS NOT TRUE!!!
Ever heard about sarcasm?? Or just a plain joke (No it's not importent if it's funny or not)

He did publish the bible though, and probably did the layout work on it too!
 
Racism is not welcome here!!! Now go play russian roulette or play in traffic or something else safe and fun like a good little boy!!!
hehe, sorry i wasnt aware saying tea and crumpets would be considered to be racism..

Anyway, go ahead and call me a danish potato eating fa****. Im lucky enough to have more importen things to think about;)

And yea, we dont really play that much russian roulette over here but what about some football instead?

edit: Haaay!!
 
Oh, and btw, there is NO evidence to support the idea that Chell from Portal will play a role in Episode 3. GlaDOS probably will, as well as the Portal device, but for all we know, Chell is dead.


While I agree with almost all of your original post, you are incredibly incorrect on this point.

http://www.g4tv.com/xplay/index.html
Look for the video "X-Play Preview: PORTAL"

Gabe says it all in his own words that Chell will play a part in Episode 3.
 
Back
Top