I was really excited about Halo 2 coming out and having to buy an XBOX. :imu:
So on my way back from school I finally bought it, ran home like crazy, installed the console, started Halo 2, and played for a couple of hours. And here are my impressions :
- graphics : well, the thing that really strikes your eyes is that it has nothing to do with all those eye candy screenshots we've seen the last 2 years. Halo 2 is like Halo 1, except for bump mapping (reflections). The models are still low on polygons, and the maps are very empty, just like in the 1st one. Halo PC looks a lot better than Halo 2. GRADE : 2/10.
- audio : great sounds, that's all you can hope for in 2004.
GRADE : 9/10.
- controls : awful. It can't be worse. The XBOX MUST be sold with a keyboard and mouse adapters! GRADE : 1/10.
- storyline : it's pretty good. I will abide by the "no spoilers policy". GRADE : 8/10.
- multiplayer : it is very weak. In fact, every Halo fan should own a copy of Unreal Tournament 2004. The only positive factor is the splitscreen mode. GRADE : 3/10.
TOTAL : 5/10.
FINAL WORD : how dare Halo fans even compare Halo 2 to a FPS on a PC. I was really persuaded that there was really some competition between games like Half-Life 2, FarCry and Halo 2. Now I know the truth : Halo 2 would have been a good game in 2002. But in 2004? GET BACK TO REALITY : THE ASNWER IS NO!
So maybe Halo 2 is great compared to other XBOX games, and that's probably why Halo 2 got great reviews with scores up to 10/10, but as far as I'm concerned, a person that claims that Halo 2 is as good or better than let's say Far Cry should see a doctor. :upstare:
So on my way back from school I finally bought it, ran home like crazy, installed the console, started Halo 2, and played for a couple of hours. And here are my impressions :
- graphics : well, the thing that really strikes your eyes is that it has nothing to do with all those eye candy screenshots we've seen the last 2 years. Halo 2 is like Halo 1, except for bump mapping (reflections). The models are still low on polygons, and the maps are very empty, just like in the 1st one. Halo PC looks a lot better than Halo 2. GRADE : 2/10.
- audio : great sounds, that's all you can hope for in 2004.
GRADE : 9/10.
- controls : awful. It can't be worse. The XBOX MUST be sold with a keyboard and mouse adapters! GRADE : 1/10.
- storyline : it's pretty good. I will abide by the "no spoilers policy". GRADE : 8/10.
- multiplayer : it is very weak. In fact, every Halo fan should own a copy of Unreal Tournament 2004. The only positive factor is the splitscreen mode. GRADE : 3/10.
TOTAL : 5/10.
FINAL WORD : how dare Halo fans even compare Halo 2 to a FPS on a PC. I was really persuaded that there was really some competition between games like Half-Life 2, FarCry and Halo 2. Now I know the truth : Halo 2 would have been a good game in 2002. But in 2004? GET BACK TO REALITY : THE ASNWER IS NO!
So maybe Halo 2 is great compared to other XBOX games, and that's probably why Halo 2 got great reviews with scores up to 10/10, but as far as I'm concerned, a person that claims that Halo 2 is as good or better than let's say Far Cry should see a doctor. :upstare: