ComradeBadger
Tank
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
- Messages
- 1,723
- Reaction score
- 2
Right, I can say that they both left me with different impressions.
Doom 3's came across as a very slick, well produced movie that intended to show the game at it's very best, scary things happening all the time, very cool. I lapped up the demons and zombies and the action sequences. It came across as very professional. I want to buy this game
Half Life 2's came across as though Gabe was just trying to explain what they had here, it was very very cool looking, but his (very quiet) voiceover and the journalist's 'wisecracks' kinda ruined it for me, I would have preferred a proper voiceover and the journalist's laughs and 'wow's edited out, as far as E3 demos go.
I want to buy both of these games, and I think that the difference between the E3 presentations highlights the difference between the developers. id are at the top of their game, treating this game like a very high-budget FPS, the old kings of the gere returning for their crown, pushing it like a first-person survival horror and a very high-class one at that. Doom 3's polish is very evident in each second of graphical glory. Valve are new to the game development buisnees as a company, but not as individuals, and that showed... however the pure quality that oozed from every section not broken by guffaws shone through, a bit rough around the edges, but the use of all FPS gameplay all the way through highlighted the origanal's strengths, and the sense of immersion that Valve are very good at. The hints about City 17 left me wanting a lot more..
Anyway, like I've said before, I want both of these games, and in the war between Half Life 2 and Doom 3, the biggest winners are gamers
Doom 3's came across as a very slick, well produced movie that intended to show the game at it's very best, scary things happening all the time, very cool. I lapped up the demons and zombies and the action sequences. It came across as very professional. I want to buy this game
Half Life 2's came across as though Gabe was just trying to explain what they had here, it was very very cool looking, but his (very quiet) voiceover and the journalist's 'wisecracks' kinda ruined it for me, I would have preferred a proper voiceover and the journalist's laughs and 'wow's edited out, as far as E3 demos go.
I want to buy both of these games, and I think that the difference between the E3 presentations highlights the difference between the developers. id are at the top of their game, treating this game like a very high-budget FPS, the old kings of the gere returning for their crown, pushing it like a first-person survival horror and a very high-class one at that. Doom 3's polish is very evident in each second of graphical glory. Valve are new to the game development buisnees as a company, but not as individuals, and that showed... however the pure quality that oozed from every section not broken by guffaws shone through, a bit rough around the edges, but the use of all FPS gameplay all the way through highlighted the origanal's strengths, and the sense of immersion that Valve are very good at. The hints about City 17 left me wanting a lot more..
Anyway, like I've said before, I want both of these games, and in the war between Half Life 2 and Doom 3, the biggest winners are gamers