I know what CS:S needs...

[TheGGMan]

A smaller more random grenade hitbox.

 

[Hanne]

It needs CTF

 

[ukfluke]

its needs put down...seriously.

edit: cs:s has already failed. Nobody who plays competetive cs wants to play source. It will still be played but by nowhere near the same numbers as 1.6 now or in the future.

1.6 will continue to be the #1 fps multiplayer until something better comes along.

 

[MadHatter]

its needs put down...seriously.

edit: cs:s has already failed. Nobody who plays competetive cs wants to play source. It will still be played but by nowhere near the same numbers as 1.6 now or in the future.

1.6 will continue to be the #1 fps multiplayer until something better comes along.

Explain. Can't make statements like that without further backing it up.

 

[ukfluke]

look at the comments in these threads about cs:s. Even allowing for some complete retards who post most of the feedback is negative.


http://www.sk-gaming.com/forums.php?forum_id=2&id=26982

http://www.sk-gaming.com/forums.php?forum_id=2&id=26662

http://www.sk-gaming.com/forums.php?forum_id=2&id=28828

Its pretty representative of what i hear all the time from players about cs:s. I used to be angry at how bad cs:s is but now im all cool becuase most peeps think the same. Its heading to be a minority mp fps.

 

[MadHatter]

Probably because it's not polished up. I didn't like the way they released Counter Strike: Source before Half-Life 2. It kind of didn't go right. If it doesn't become the #1 mp game, oh well, I don't care.

 

[LeXo5]

It needs CTF

:O that would be awesome

 

[dc_clan]

Some of the people who posted on those forums never even have played CSS.

 

[bliink]

:O that would be awesome

that would be a different game

 

[Dulrough]

look at the comments in these threads about cs:s. Even allowing for some complete retards who post most of the feedback is negative.


http://www.sk-gaming.com/forums.php?forum_id=2&id=26982

http://www.sk-gaming.com/forums.php?forum_id=2&id=26662

http://www.sk-gaming.com/forums.php?forum_id=2&id=28828

Its pretty representative of what i hear all the time from players about cs:s. I used to be angry at how bad cs:s is but now im all cool becuase most peeps think the same. Its heading to be a minority mp fps.

Dude, read the comments in there, they thought the same thing about 1.6, and a great deal expect it the bugs to be ironed out, and for CS:S to become the new staple.

 

[silverstealth89]

css needs less hitbox drag

 

[BongSKAKK]

im just going to wait for the december update before i make up my mind....

 

[poseyjmac]

the sole reason CS 1.6 is going to be popular for a long time is because it can run great on crappy machines. thats CS:S's only huge weakness

 

[Mujuro]

It needs...something that I don't know...

 

[phat-ant]

maps and models! all it needs. is good stuff other wise

 

[Ecthe|ioN]

maps and models are coming in december. CS:S will grow over time. just like 1.6 did. I still remember the "OMGZ I'm Sticking with 1.5. 1.6 is teh sux0rz! **** U Valve"-threads.

 

[ukfluke]

anyone who comapares the change from 1.5 to 1.6 and 1.6 to cs:s is a ****ing retard

 

[boglito]

anyone who comapares the change from 1.5 to 1.6 and 1.6 to cs:s is a ****ing retard

Nobody have been comparing changes from 1.5-1.6 with 1.6-cs:s here. It's the everpresent whining from people like you that has been compared.

.bog.

 

[TheGGMan]

lol the nade hitbox was a JOKE

btw Ecthe|ioN plz gimme ur pc

tnx