mindless_moder
Tank
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2003
- Messages
- 4,931
- Reaction score
- 0
what game is that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
what game is that?
Stavros was Uncle Jesse's cousin from Greece, also played by John Stamos. He was a greasy womanizer who went around hitting on Jesse's girlfriend Becky and stole money from the family.That's Stamos
Stavros was Uncle Jesse's cousin from Greece, also played by John Stamos. He was a greasy womanizer who went around hitting on Jesse's girlfriend Becky and stole money from the family.
Don't doubt my sitcom knowledge, son; I was raised by TV. :dork:
Awesome pics giant! I especially liked the "Save -$10 dollars" for some reason.
When will people learn not to save print screens as .jpg?
and why not ?
Huge mass, zero width, zero height, zero depth... the Philips Black Hole! Online orders only.
I've never seen a large JPG...then again, every PNG I've seen is always bigger than the same thing as PNG. Sure a little quality is lost, but on small pictures or something, it's not really that noticeable, and people who are yelling about it are too damn nitpicky I've always saved my jpgs through Photoshop, and I've never really noticed any quality loss. But Paint on the other hand....
PNG is much, much better than JPG on pictures with few different colors and large chunks of the same color. Like pictures of webpages and stuff. JPG derives little to no benefit from those two things. JPG is good for complex pictures like photo's.
I just tested it and a pic from a wiki page saved as PNG is 36 KB and has no quality loss (PNG is lossless) and the same pic in JPG is 250 KB and the leters are blurry and the wrong color.
Wow, I guess I'm doing something wrong. I'm using Paint to save as Jpg/PNG tests, is that what you're using?
PNG is much, much better than JPG on pictures with few different colors and large chunks of the same color. Like pictures of webpages and stuff. JPG derives little to no benefit from those two things. JPG is good for complex pictures like photo's.
I just tested it and a pic from a wiki page saved as PNG is 36 KB and has no quality loss (PNG is lossless) and the same pic in JPG is 250 KB and the leters are blurry and the wrong color.
Use photoshop and select the save for the web feature.
PNGs have an alpha channel, which makes them much much better in some cases.