Iran caught red-handed shipping weapons to the Taliban

or worse a dozen paragraphs of near incomprehensible babblespeak that has little to do with torture and more to do with why stress positioning isnt all that bad ..I mean everyone loves bananas right?
 
Now I'm dying for a reply, the suspense is killing me.

Which kerberos will show up, the hypocrite, the idiot, or both? I can't wait.
 
personally I think it'll be kerberos the incomprehensible
 
Media try to paint Iran as a monster. What they don't let you know is that Bush refused to allow any response to the Iranian peace offer. Most Americans even don't know there was such a thing. Who wants war?

Quote, "Iran Proposal to U.S. Offered Peace with Israel
By Gareth Porter*

WASHINGTON, May 24 (IPS) - Iran offered in 2003 to accept peace with Israel and cut off material assistance to Palestinian armed groups and to pressure them to halt terrorist attacks within Israel's 1967 borders, according to the secret Iranian proposal to the United States.

The two-page proposal for a broad Iran-U.S. agreement covering all the issues separating the two countries, a copy of which was obtained by IPS, was conveyed to the United States in late April or early May 2003. Trita Parsi, a specialist on Iranian foreign policy at Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies who provided the document to IPS, says he got it from an Iranian official earlier this year but is not at liberty to reveal the source.

The two-page document contradicts the official line of the George W. Bush administration that Iran is committed to the destruction of Israel and the sponsorship of terrorism in the region.

Parsi says the document is a summary of an even more detailed Iranian negotiating proposal which he learned about in 2003 from the U.S. intermediary who carried it to the State Department on behalf of the Swiss Embassy in late April or early May 2003. The intermediary has not yet agreed to be identified, according to Parsi.

The Iranian negotiating proposal indicated clearly that Iran was prepared to give up its role as a supporter of armed groups in the region in return for a larger bargain with the United States. What the Iranians wanted in return, as suggested by the document itself as well as expert observers of Iranian policy, was an end to U.S. hostility and recognition of Iran as a legitimate power in the region.

But in 2003, Bush refused to allow any response to the Iranian offer to negotiate an agreement that would have accepted the existence of Israel. Flynt Leverett, then the senior specialist on the Middle East on the National Security Council staff, recalled in an interview with IPS that it was "literally a few days" between the receipt of the Iranian proposal and the dispatch of a message to the Swiss ambassador expressing displeasure that he had forwarded it to Washington.

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=33350
 
Back
Top