E
Eternity
Guest
Is Doug Lombardi a bad person?
Hello. I'm a bit surprised that there isn't more threads devoted to Fragmaster's selective revealing of information, so I'm starting one, because I found it extremely interesting. Who knew that Sierra would hire him for a Prima Strategy Guide on Half-Life II? To me, I don't find this too smart; Fragmaster seems like he could get the job done (despite what he looks like in that SA video) but do you really want to reveal potentially damaging information to someone who runs one of the biggest Half-Life II fan sites in the world? There are some potentially sticky situations there, and as we saw, they all came true. Fragmaster was bound by an NDA, but he stirred up muck anyway, and who can blame him. Let's face it, he was right: the game was going to be delayed, he knew about it, and it was going to happen, hack or not. Valve must have been very nervous of his spouting of information; during those months he knew more about the real state of the game better than anyone other than the game developers themselves.
Anyway, do you guys think, in light of what Fragmaster has revealed, that a) Valve is seriously lacking in a structured PR department/way of doing things and/or b) Doug Lombardi isn't the man for the job?
Now, I don't know Doug. I don't want to put heat on him and shout to the forums that he should be fired, because I don't know him, and basically who wants to wish that on a person? But I find what Fragmaster revealed a little disturbing, if only for the fact it backs up what I've been feeling for the past year or so. Valve's blackout prior to the release of Half-Life II was perfectly justified. They didn't want to hype the game. This was the smartest business move that they could have ever made, and I have to give Doug props for keeping the game under wrap all those years.
But man, things have been falling apart. Denials that the game is going to slip before the hack? Why would Valve do this? Why couldn't they just say that the god-damn game was delayed? The real question is, why the hell didn't Doug see it fit to just dispatch an e-mail to the fansites out there telling them what's up? He had already notified the major mags that the game wouldn't be out before the holidays; to me, the only reason he didn't tell us was because he didn't have to. The mags needed to know, we didn't, so he left us in the dark.
I think this part really strikes home with Fragmaster's argument that they don't respect the community. Before all you bumblers out there scream out with their 'they don't owe us nothing', quiet please. I don't like foggy thinking. Number one, they don't 'owe' us anything, but does that mean we can't point out they don't respect us? Just because they don't have to doesn't mean they shouldn't.
I just don't know about Doug and the way he does his job. Gabe, I think Gabe is a good leader and basically a cool person with a couple shortcomings. He doesn't really understand our position, but that's just lack of perspective. He matter of factly told us that the game was going to ship in the summer like it was a confirmation; like we were expecting it; but what he didn't realize is we had no ****ing idea when the game was going to ship!!
The blackout after the hack was REALLY unprofessional. I mean, Bungie has weekly updates. We had silence for 3/4 of a year. I mean, come on, Doug.
What do you guys think? Do you think Doug and his staff is inadequate? Would you even say he's not a nice person, or is that crossing the line? What are your thoughts?
Hello. I'm a bit surprised that there isn't more threads devoted to Fragmaster's selective revealing of information, so I'm starting one, because I found it extremely interesting. Who knew that Sierra would hire him for a Prima Strategy Guide on Half-Life II? To me, I don't find this too smart; Fragmaster seems like he could get the job done (despite what he looks like in that SA video) but do you really want to reveal potentially damaging information to someone who runs one of the biggest Half-Life II fan sites in the world? There are some potentially sticky situations there, and as we saw, they all came true. Fragmaster was bound by an NDA, but he stirred up muck anyway, and who can blame him. Let's face it, he was right: the game was going to be delayed, he knew about it, and it was going to happen, hack or not. Valve must have been very nervous of his spouting of information; during those months he knew more about the real state of the game better than anyone other than the game developers themselves.
Anyway, do you guys think, in light of what Fragmaster has revealed, that a) Valve is seriously lacking in a structured PR department/way of doing things and/or b) Doug Lombardi isn't the man for the job?
Now, I don't know Doug. I don't want to put heat on him and shout to the forums that he should be fired, because I don't know him, and basically who wants to wish that on a person? But I find what Fragmaster revealed a little disturbing, if only for the fact it backs up what I've been feeling for the past year or so. Valve's blackout prior to the release of Half-Life II was perfectly justified. They didn't want to hype the game. This was the smartest business move that they could have ever made, and I have to give Doug props for keeping the game under wrap all those years.
But man, things have been falling apart. Denials that the game is going to slip before the hack? Why would Valve do this? Why couldn't they just say that the god-damn game was delayed? The real question is, why the hell didn't Doug see it fit to just dispatch an e-mail to the fansites out there telling them what's up? He had already notified the major mags that the game wouldn't be out before the holidays; to me, the only reason he didn't tell us was because he didn't have to. The mags needed to know, we didn't, so he left us in the dark.
I think this part really strikes home with Fragmaster's argument that they don't respect the community. Before all you bumblers out there scream out with their 'they don't owe us nothing', quiet please. I don't like foggy thinking. Number one, they don't 'owe' us anything, but does that mean we can't point out they don't respect us? Just because they don't have to doesn't mean they shouldn't.
I just don't know about Doug and the way he does his job. Gabe, I think Gabe is a good leader and basically a cool person with a couple shortcomings. He doesn't really understand our position, but that's just lack of perspective. He matter of factly told us that the game was going to ship in the summer like it was a confirmation; like we were expecting it; but what he didn't realize is we had no ****ing idea when the game was going to ship!!
The blackout after the hack was REALLY unprofessional. I mean, Bungie has weekly updates. We had silence for 3/4 of a year. I mean, come on, Doug.
What do you guys think? Do you think Doug and his staff is inadequate? Would you even say he's not a nice person, or is that crossing the line? What are your thoughts?