Just a thought....

bvasgm said:
Nicely put. Kmack, you're telling me that you'd rush the guy when he's holding a knife? Sorry, but I don't see that happening. It doesn't matter how strong of tough you think you are. All that matters is that he's got a deadly weapon, and you don't.

why would someone NEED a gun in this situation, pepperspray or a taser is a much better solution. I'm not a tough guy, but i can defend myself without a gun. I have no problem with police officers, their guns save lives, their presences are a detterent enough. If a cop walked up and said stop, chances are the man would because he knows the cop is armed. What I do have a problem with is some chump I don't know walking around with a concealed firearm, ready to draw and fire in 1 second to save the day. THOSE are the cowards.
 
you know what i mean. Lets just say its a concealed Samurai sword....i dunno
 
kmack said:
why would someone NEED a gun in this situation, pepperspray or a taser is a much better solution. I'm not a tough guy, but i can defend myself without a gun. I have no problem with police officers, their guns save lives, their presences are a detterent enough. If a cop walked up and said stop, chances are the man would because he knows the cop is armed. What I do have a problem with is some chump I don't know walking around with a concealed firearm, ready to draw and fire in 1 second to save the day. THOSE are the cowards.

Yep, every time I interrupt a raping/stabbing/beating in progress, the suspect always stops when I tell him to. :dozey:
 
meh it works for bobbies in the UK "stop or I'll say "stop" again!"
 
Hapless said:
Yep, every time I interrupt a raping/stabbing/beating in progress, the suspect always stops when I tell him to. :dozey:

sarcasm is the retort of the weak.

how many times have you shot a suspect? :dozey:
 
kmack said:
sarcasm is the retort of the weak.

how many times have you shot a suspect? :dozey:

I dont think this is relevant, but the first man to say "Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit" was Oscar Wilde...and guess what....he was being sarcastic :p

Its probably just me, but whether it was a gun or not, i would aim to kill the attacker.
 
CptStern said:
meh it works for bobbies in the UK "stop or I'll say "stop" again!"


Hehehehehehe, i thought that was hilarious, it was Robin Williams who said that :).

"bang bang bang bang bang bang, stop or i'll shoot"
 
kmack said:
What I do have a problem with is some chump I don't know walking around with a concealed firearm, ready to draw and fire in 1 second to save the day. THOSE are the cowards.
So what you're saying is that if you attempt to beat up the guy holding the knife you're so much braver than the guy with the gun. It doesn't mean you're braver, it means you're an idiot. Why the hell would you attempt to stop him when he has a knife with your bare hands instead of using the gun? What you're saying makes absolutely no sense. Using a firearm to end a dangerous situation doesn't make you a coward. It's the quickest, most effective way to handel it. Personally, I'd choose the gun in a second and so would you. (unless you like the idea of getting stabbed.)
 
kmack, don't be so dumb, it's not about bravery or anything.
Cowards are people like the rapist, who deserve to be shot in the nuts and then the throat.
It is in an animals nature to pick the most effective form of defense or offense.
Put it this way, if you shot the rapist with a gun, that would be it.
If you went against a rapist with a knife you may end up bleeding to death on the floor with the girl.

The only thing i agree with is that you should never entrust your life with a weapon, it is very good to get good at hand to hand combat......you cant have your fists taken off you (well you can *ouch* but you cant ban them)

In the UK i am stopped from carrying any type of weapon, so if i had to stop a rapist it would have to be with my fists (or anything near by)
I would punch him in the back of the neck, nocking him out, then stamp on his head to kill him.
 
bvasgm said:
So what you're saying is that if you attempt to beat up the guy holding the knife you're so much braver than the guy with the gun. It doesn't mean you're braver, it means you're an idiot. Why the hell would you attempt to stop him when he has a knife with your bare hands instead of using the gun? What you're saying makes absolutely no sense. Using a firearm to end a dangerous situation doesn't make you a coward. It's the quickest, most effective way to handel it. Personally, I'd choose the gun in a second and so would you. (unless you like the idea of getting stabbed.)

i never said that using physical violence was braver, just that its safer to use a taser or pepper spray or hands.

And no, i would not choose a gun i would choose a taser, a can of mace, and finally physical violence

dont put words in my mouth, and dont suggest that id use a gun.
 
The original options were a gun or a sword, so lets forget about the peper spray or the Taser, even though the Taser is more dangerous [to you] than the gun. With a taser, you get one 'shot'. The little dart with the wire connected to the end shoots out and that's it. You miss you're essentially ****ed. You're saying physical violence is safer. Safer to who? You, people near you, or the rapist? Because going up against a guy with a knife using physical violence isn't very safe for you. If you're about to attack a guy holding a knife and you get to choose if you use your bare hands, or a gun, you choose the gun. [yes you, stop trying to deny it]
 
Razor said:
Hehehehehehe, i thought that was hilarious, it was Robin Williams who said that :).

"bang bang bang bang bang bang, stop or i'll shoot"

lol! :LOL: ya, williams
 
kmack said:
sarcasm is the retort of the weak.

This from the same guy who thinks he can take on knife weilding assailants with his bare hands.

kmack said:
how many times have you shot a suspect? :dozey:

Luckily I haven't had to pull the trigger. I've come very close. How many times have you wrestled a knife from someone? :eek:
 
Hapless said:
Luckily I haven't had to pull the trigger. I've come very close. How many times have you wrestled a knife from someone? :eek:

twice.
 
some chump I don't know walking around with a concealed firearm, ready to draw and fire in 1 second to save the day.
And in that one second, you will run 50yds, and disarm me? I laugh that you think you could take me on if i was armed. Also, i made a mistake, so now ill fix it:

For a .22

Saftey on, Round Chambered, Holstered = 3in circle at 50yds 1.68 seconds, second aimed round in .45 seconds (Not double tap)

Saftey on, No round Chambered, Holstered = 3in circle at 50yds 3.23 seconds

For a 9mm

Saftey on, Round Chambered, Holstered = 4in circle at 45yds 1.78 seconds Second aimed round in .8 second

Saftey on, Round Not chambered, Holstered = 5in circle at 50 yds 5.04 seconds, second aimed round .8 seconds.


Trust me, you wouldn't have a chance. Unless of course you believe you can survive a .22 in your brain.
Oh and i have wrestled a knife from someone at High School. It was a smaller switch blade, but i still did it and only cut my shirt.
 
bvasgm said:
You say so. :rolleyes:

sarcasm is the retort of the weak.

and why ask a question if your only intention is to refute it if it contradicts your purpose (do discredit me in the way i discredited you).
 
Kebean PFC said:
And in that one second, you will run 50yds, and disarm me? I laugh that you think you could take me on if i was armed. Also, i made a mistake, so now ill fix it:

why would i try and disarm you? and since when are you 50 yards away? id just find cover and wait while you wet yourself in fear. ;)
 
kmack said:
sarcasm is the retort of the weak. and why ask a question if your only intention is to refute it if it contradicts your purpose (do discredit me in the way i discredited you).
Ok, first of all it's to discredit me, not do discredit me. Second, you're telling me that either time you allegedly disarmed a guy holding a knife, you didn't wish you had a gun? Sorry, I just don't think that's true, but if it is, your argument has no value. What kind of idiot prefers to fight a knife weilding opponent hand to hand rather than with a gun?
 
bvasgm said:
Ok, first of all it's to discredit me, not do discredit me. Second, you're telling me that either time you allegedly disarmed a guy holding a knife, you didn't wish you had a gun? Sorry, I just don't think that's true, but if it is, your argument has no value. What kind of idiot prefers to fight a knife weilding opponent hand to hand rather than with a gun?

the kind of idiot who doesnt want to endanger innocent bystaders.

and as for my grammar in fact "do discredit me as i discredited you" is perfect english, it is an invitation encouraging you to do something.

do
realize that you are not funny (but rather grossly immature) to post in that manner.
 
and since when are you 50 yards away? id just find cover and wait while you wet yourself in fear.

You would wait while i wet myself in fear? HAHAHAHAHAHA oh man... i have a gun, you have nothing, and i am AFRAID of you! ROFL!

I have been 50yds away since my first post on this thread.
 
Kebean PFC said:
You would wait while i wet myself in fear? HAHAHAHAHAHA oh man... i have a gun, you have nothing, and i am AFRAID of you! ROFL!

just the kind of person i want waltzing around with a gun :|
 
I am sorry, but you sir are a moron.

I could kill you before you could get to me. This aint the movies boy.
 
First of all...you're right, that was just a flagrant attempt to reach 300 by the end of the day.
Second...you're right, I read your post too fast.
Third...How is using a gun dangerout to innocent bystanders? You have a gun. He knows you have a gun. Why would he try and get it from you as you suggest? He knows [or at the very least strongly suspects] that you'll shoot him if he tries to.
 
Then what good is hiding? Him hiding from me only increases that chances that i will shoot him when he comes out. I don't see what he intends to do by hiding.
that was just a flagrant attempt to reach 300 by the end of the day
Thanks for pointing it out, didn't even know.
 
bvasgm said:
First of all...you're right, that was just a flagrant attempt to reach 300 by the end of the day.
Second...you're right, I read your post too fast.
Third...How is using a gun dangerout to innocent bystanders? You have a gun. He knows you have a gun. Why would he try and get it from you as you suggest? He knows [or at the very least strongly suspects] that you'll shoot him if he tries to.

remember a few weeks ago? nichols? killing spree?

I am simply saying that in this situation resorting to a gun is foolish. Can you honestly say that pepper spray or a taser is any less effective at stopping this person, weighing in the potential for innocent people to be hurt (the guy is on top of someone raping her so in case you didnt realize, he has to be pretty close).
I would use physical force if i didnt have a taser or pepper spray, i wouldnt use a gun, thats all im saying.

Kebean PFC said:
And in that one second, you will run 50yds, and disarm me? I laugh that you think you could take me on if i was armed. Also, i made a mistake, so now ill fix it:

For a .22

Saftey on, Round Chambered, Holstered = 3in circle at 50yds 1.68 seconds, second aimed round in .45 seconds (Not double tap)

Saftey on, No round Chambered, Holstered = 3in circle at 50yds 3.23 seconds

For a 9mm

Saftey on, Round Chambered, Holstered = 4in circle at 45yds 1.78 seconds Second aimed round in .8 second

Saftey on, Round Not chambered, Holstered = 5in circle at 50 yds 5.04 seconds, second aimed round .8 seconds.


Trust me, you wouldn't have a chance. Unless of course you believe you can survive a .22 in your brain.
Oh and i have wrestled a knife from someone at High School. It was a smaller switch blade, but i still did it and only cut my shirt.


disagree with me all you want, but please dont use this as a platform to show off your leet gun skills. did you make yourself wet while typing that?
 
disagree with me all you want, but please dont use this as a platform to show off your leet gun skills. did you make yourself wet while typing that?
Dont sink to personal insults Mr. Phisical. I didn't use this as a platform, i stated facts. If you would like to be ignorant, then don't come here.
 
Yes. I can honestly say that a taser or pepper spray is less effective than a gun. With pepper spray, you've got to get close enough so that the pepper spray reaches him and close enough to spray it in his eyes. That means getting within potential knife range. Right there, that alone makes it much less effective. With a Taser, like I said earlier, you've got one shot. The little dart with the wires attached to the end shoots out and if it hits him, he gets electrocuted. If everything works perfectly then yes, then it is the more effective way to stop him. What you're not considering, is that if you miss, you're ****ed. One shot...one shot. Also, and more importantly, if the rapist is still...uh...
in the process...of..ya know...IN the process...
:eek: the electrical current runs right through him and shocks her. Ergo...less effective than using a gun.

300th post w00t!!1!
 
I wouldn't kill him unless it appeared that he would kill her.

I'd definitely shoot him in the foot about six times, though.
 
Absinthe said:
My ideal plan would be to yell, hold him at gunpoint, and make him get off

Sorry for pointing these out, but I just had to laugh when I read that.

Seriously though, considering I'm a freaking pansy, I'd probably hold the gun from a distance and yell at him. I'd probably freak out, shoot the gun, miss and hit the girl.

Then the guy would run after me and I'd spin around in circles firing with my eyes closed. Six other bystanders die due to bullet wounds while the rapist tackles me and is exulted as a hero.
 
What are you doing!? Don't say that! You're just giving kmack something to point at and say "Aha! See..guns are teh suck."
 
Back
Top