Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Take a huge dump before the assessment.
I wish you would provide proof of these things in bold. These are some pretty important statements you made.Well VirusType, any source that isn't biased will tell you that Gatorade doesn't hydrate you because the sugar cancels it out. Doesn't matter if the water absorbs faster if the sugar renders it useless. The relevant fact to our body-mass-challenged friend is the sugar.
Gatorade also happens to be primarily fructose-sugars that don't process as quickly into the system as natural sugars do. Don't drink the damn stuff, all it does is make you fatter.
Earlier this year, a study was released comparing colas sweetened with sucrose, HFCS [High Fructose Corn Syrup], and straight fructose on overall metabolic pathway expression. For those consuming 6 colas a day with sucrose [Sugar], 12.5% of their overall calories were turned to fat (lipogenesis). For the subjects consuming HFCS (50% fructose, 50% glucose), the lipogenesis rates were 25%. For those consuming straight fructose sweetened colas, the lipogenesis rate was 40%!!! All treatments were calorically equivalent. This means that fructose apparently changes our metabolism in a way that leads to the body storing more fat rather than burning via glycolysis or storing as glycogen.
UC Davis Nutrition Center is working on a much larger study on the effect of fructose on metabolism and fat deposition. So far, they have found a substantial increase in adipose tissue increase with the fructose fed group vs. sucrose, plus they have confirmed the increase in fat production with fructose. This data will shake the Fructose industry to its core, explaining why they are mounting a desparate last ditch marketing campaign to portray fructose as safe and suitable. It will also help to explain some of the increase in obesity in our country since HFCS was introduced into practically every cola, baked product, and dessert product in the late 1970's.
^Disregard everything this man just said^
No disrespect, but that really is one of the worst ways to lose weight. Weight-loss diets are just as bad for you as stuffing your face with fast food, just in a different way. The key is moderation. Also, like I said earlier, weight lifting is a great way to bulk and tone muscles, but if you're going for weight-loss, running would be best. This is because it's a good combination of cardio and muscle building.
Disregard everything that i have just said.
^Disregard all of the above posts^
Send me a PM with your credit card and bank numbers and I will help you lose weight fast, guaranteed.
If you want to lose weight, you ought to alter your diet and take in fewer calories. There is no way around this fact.
Yes, I know. I'm saying that most weight-loss diets basically starve your body, and this is just as bad as over-eating. If someone eats McDonald's everyday, then of course they're going to lose weight is they start doing Atkins or whatever the new craze is. However, they're also going to be doing damage to their body by starving it like that. A good, balanced diet along with exercise would be better.
Case in point: Last spring, a friend joined the track team. He weighed about 180 lbs and ate fast food at least once a week, if not more. After a few days of running he decided that he really liked it, and wanted to keep getting faster, so he stopped eating fast food... and pretty much all other foods. Our coach found out and told him to start eating right, then gave him some ideas of what "eating right" would be. By the end of the season he had lost 40 lbs (our season is 3 & 1/2 months long).
tl;dr: In my experience, exercise and a balanced diet are more effective. Show me believable evidence that says otherwise and I'll glady admit I'm wrong.
Reduced-calorie diets result in clinically meaningful weight loss regardless of which macronutrients they emphasize.
You should also realize that when you diet, you are not starving. Your body is using the energy of your fat cells to take care of excess energy expenditure.
Dieting(without exercising too) worked for loads of people I know including me so the ''diets dont work'' thing I don't really buy. And by saying diet I mean they started eating properly, eating normal portions etc(not starving themselves either). It was the change in what they ate that saw them lose the weight.
How much and what were they eating before, and how much weight did they have to lose? It's possible if they were on very high calorie diets previously then their metabolism was already sky high and this combined with the change of diet (but without starving themselves!) fuelled the weight loss.
Here is a little thought experiment for you:
Suppose you eat a perfectly "balanced diet" of exactly 2,000 calories. Suppose you expend 2,000 calories per day simply by being alive and doing excercise.
Now, suppose you continue to eat a perfectly "balanced diet" of exactly 2,100 calories, and your expenditure remains 2,000 calories. What will happen, over time? After approximately 30 days, you will gain, on average, a pound of fat.
Now, suppose you continue to eat a perfectly "balanced diet" of exactly 1,900 calories, and your expenditure remains 2,000 calories. What will happen? You will lose some weight.
Suppose you eat 1,900 calories, "perfectly balanced," (whatever the **** that means), and also expend 2,100 calories by being alive and exercising. You will lose more weight than if you had simply dieted. You will also lose more weight than if you had decided to eat 2,000 calories and expend 2,100 calories.
Well in my case I was 13 stone(i'm about 5.8-10ish) and dropped to 11 stone in about 2-2.5months. My diet was fine before(generally) but I would gorge on biscuits/cakes etc if someone at home bought them. That was the only thing I really ate that was 'bad'.
I cut that out and concentrated on fresh veg, fruit, high-fibre foods, lean meats( I didn't bother with anything like steak anymore or if I did eat it only rarely) etc. If I needed a snack I'd get a piece of fruit or a low-fat yoghurt instead of making a sandwich.
So I didn't 'restrict' the amount I ate, I just ate healthily.
^Disregard everything this man just said^
No disrespect, but that really is one of the worst ways to lose weight. Weight-loss diets are just as bad for you as stuffing your face with fast food, just in a different way. The key is moderation. Also, like I said earlier, weight lifting is a great way to bulk and tone muscles, but if you're going for weight-loss, running would be best. This is because it's a good combination of cardio and muscle building.
Chances are, when I have lost the weight I'll still need to keep the exercise going or it will all go back on again. I feel great and I know for sure I will achieve my goals (I write them down every morning and focus on them every day), but it's a huge commitment and a permanent lifestyle change. If you are someone with a chronic weight problem, you're almost certainly going to have the endomorphic body type and this means you will have to make this lifelong effort or you will always be fat.
repiV, do yourself a favor and calculate exactly how many calories you consume each day for a week if you aren't doing so already. I found this to be one of the best things you can do to help you lose weight.
that's the main thing people don't understand. It doesn't have much to do with your body type in 99% of the cases (thats more of an excuse). It simply has to do with changing your mindset about food and doing so permenantly. Anyone that goes on a temporary diet to lose weight will always fail. But onces a good diet becomes habit (by no means simple thing to do) weight loss is easy and so is keeping that weight off.
Is swimming an option for you? That can be damn good exercise all round and is fairly easy on the joints.Then there's the weight training three times a week, cardio (I stick to very brisk walking because my leg is ****ed and I can't do anything too strenuous, I hope this will still work for me)
Is swimming an option for you? That can be damn good exercise all round and is fairly easy on the joints.
But then the body reaches a natural equilibrium, and you can't really get significantly below that just by eating differently.
btw noob weight question: how do you work out what weight of dumbbell you need when starting weight training?
Actually, your body will just balance its metabolism to match whatever number of calories you eat.
By robbing him blind of every penny so he can't even afford to buy food? A brilliant diet plan!^Disregard all of the above posts^
Send me a PM with your credit card and bank numbers and I will help you lose weight fast, guaranteed.
Yes, it is better to eat a "balanced" diet than an "unbalanced diet," however, it is NOT impossible to eat LESS and still eat a "balanced" diet.
Two words: Muscle Revolution
I was on 123Kg in march-april, I weighed myself last month and was on 108Kg. (Yes I am not from the US, thus I use the metric system) Thats a loss of about 35 pounds.
Just follow that book - it has everything you need. (training routines and so on) A few extra tips:
1. Lose the diet sodas - they prevent you from losing weight (This one is definitely true - as I have experienced this myself as well as friends of mine)
2. Calculate your daily intake (Lean body mass * 12 for weight loss) (LBM = weight - fat) People at the gym should be able to tell you what your LBM is. If you weigh 200 pounds and your body fat is 20%, then your LBM is 160 pounds.
3. Use vegetables to increase your food's volume
My daily intake is about 2000 cal / day and I live of stir fry. 1Kg of stir fry = about 2 slices of white bread and about 2.5 slices of wholegrain bread. Take 50 grams of pasta with 1 chicken breast and a crapload of stir fry... you get one big ass meal. I can eat about 5-6 of those plates and still be under my daily calorie intake. Fat free plain yogurt serves the same purpose.
As a man who has to eat a lot, I just had to find a way to lose weight and eat as much as I can. The main Idea here is to start looking on the side food packaging to see how much you're really consuming.
4. Don't use anything that has more than 3 ingredients you can't pronounce
5. Don't do diets, they don't work (also out of experience)
6. Invest in some protein powder - before and after each workout (also explained in the book I mentioned)
This is also very important. During a workout your body first uses the fat reserves to produce energy, but as the exercise progresses your body starts to burn protein, because it is easier for your body to break down protein and use that as energy. This is something we want to prevent as this means losing muscle(more muscle means more energy used just because they exist! - 1Kg of muscle = about 50 cal burned a day just because they are there)
7. Eat more often, about 5 - 6 times a day.
You will find all the answers in that book. This is by far the best way of losing weight I know of.
BTW. I only used the gym for the first two months, the rest of the weight I lost just by following my eating routine. (It is not as if I follow it to the letter - Pizzas and burgers are plentiful, but I take note of them)
Hope this helps!
Currently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is examining health concerns related to levels of the toxin furan in soy protein isolate and other foods.[2]
I disagree about the protein part. Unless you are actively trying to bulk up, you do not need much more than the recommended 50 or so grams of protein per day, even if you were to exercise at the level of an elite athlete. Your body does not prefer to burn protein, it wants to use that to build cellular tissue. It wants to burn chains of sugars and fats which it assembled specifically as energy storage. Excessive protein is hard on your blood filtering system and can add up to all sorts of long term health problems.