Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Sulkdodds said:I told them not to start the banner contest for that exact reason. To be fair, it is 'on hold' now.
Sulkdodds said:what does it look like to say we're doing one contest, not bother to finish it and then start another?
Law doesn't come into it. They could tell all the letter writers to bugger off and shut up and we wouldn't have a leg to stand on. That's beside the point. It's just rude, is all. I said this last time. Lateness doesn't bother me, I'm happy to wait and wait and wait if I know when I'm waiting until. Maybe I'm alone in this (in fact, it appears I am, unless other people who feel the same just aren't being very vocal about it), but I find it disrespectful for a site to say, "go to the effort of writing us a decent letter and if it's good enough, we'll give you an amazing prize. We will announce the winner in two weeks." And then five weeks later, three after the deadline, still not a word. It's the dismissiveness of the site-staff attitude rather than lateness or cynicism about withdrawl of the prize that prompted me to make that post. Yet again, I think people here are leaping to the flame bandwagon before making any effort to try and comprehend the point I'm actually trying to make here. Which is that if you make a deal, you should honour it. And if you can't for whatever reason, you should be expected to explain yourself. I would really like someone to explain to me why this is an unreasonable thing for me to think.Solaris said:However you did offer a contract to the people who sent in the letters, I'm not sure on the legalities , but I think you are legally obliged to choose a winner now. However I'm not an expert.
Pi|Mu|Rho said:I don't recall anyone saying that we weren't going to be picking any winners or awarding a prize...
Pi|Mu|Rho said:I was actually replying to Solaris, so bugger off with your condescension and high-and-mighty attitude.
I was actually replying to Solaris, so bugger off with your condescension and high-and-mighty attitude.
DVS82 said:you should keep people informed what's going on after that.
DVS82 said:Nice. Real mature.
DVS82 said:Nice. Real mature.
You're wrong.DVS82 said:Law doesn't come into it. They could tell all the letter writers to bugger off and shut up and we wouldn't have a leg to stand on. That's beside the point. It's just rude, is all. I said this last time. Lateness doesn't bother me, I'm happy to wait and wait and wait if I know when I'm waiting until. Maybe I'm alone in this (in fact, it appears I am, unless other people who feel the same just aren't being very vocal about it), but I find it disrespectful for a site to say, "go to the effort of writing us a decent letter and if it's good enough, we'll give you an amazing prize. We will announce the winner in two weeks." And then five weeks later, three after the deadline, still not a word. It's the dismissiveness of the site-staff attitude rather than lateness or cynicism about withdrawl of the prize that prompted me to make that post. Yet again, I think people here are leaping to the flame bandwagon before making any effort to try and comprehend the point I'm actually trying to make here. Which is that if you make a deal, you should honour it. And if you can't for whatever reason, you should be expected to explain yourself. I would really like someone to explain to me why this is an unreasonable thing for me to think.
Pi|Mu|Rho said:*checks contract for maturity clause*
Nope, not there.
DVS82 said:Carry on. Turns out I'm not in the least bit surprised it's taken this long, when these are the kinds of people running the show.
DVS82 said:Carry on. Turns out I'm not in the least bit surprised it's taken this long, when these are the kinds of people running the show.
Pi|Mu|Rho said:When someone gets their facts wrong and decides to start being condescending and patronising, I respond accordingly.
This post is all I was asking. A reasonably thorough, calm and reasoned response. As I said before, I don't mind delays and I understand people having commitments. Lord knows I have enough of my own. I just wanted something akin to what you've just posted. Some admission of responsibility, rather than complete dismissiveness. So thanks for that, at least.Sui said:You're not being unreasonable in your inquiries, I'd do the same if I were in your shoes. But you contine to provoke an agressive response by continually throwing abuse at the site. I've told you the reason for the current delay; what happened in the past isn't important, although it's mainly due to the fact that a lot of us have exams, and the person who initiated the contest hasn't been around to conclude it. I know, I know - our staff system isn't the most well oiled machine - but the individual staff members aren't the reason for that, I think. It all stems from somewhere quite distant from 'the bottom'.
DVS82 said:And Sui - I think you're being very unfair to many other forum members and mods here to say that Pi is one of the most mature and responsible members. You're doing most other regulars a huge disservice.
Sulkdodds said:Sulk smash!
Sui said:[Edit] Thanks. I think it's probably because we're used to dealing with complete assholes, and it's tiring trying to reply coherently to every agressive member. However, I do feel you're justafied in your complaints, it's just that we usually don't discriminate between users when reflecting abuse