Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Crysis was just bad. Outstanding visuals but lame uninspired narrative, sloppy unfinished netcode and inadequate public development tools sank it, even for enthusiasts. They made, and read this carefully: every same damn mistake they made with Farcry. Perhaps with the exception of licensing deals I'm surprised they even turned a profit. Even IF Crysis scaled enough to be played on a wide range of systems it would still have been a mediocre shooter. Crytek should just be acquired by Nvidia and start developing tech demos.
How can you look at games like Crysis as being anything but a detriment to PC Gaming? Rigid system requirements: check, dated tiresome gameplay: check, non-existent multiplay: check. Crysis is one of those games that veers PC Gaming away from the public and shoves it back towards hardware enthusiasts and niche audiences who upgrade to 500 dollar video cards every few months.
And despite all this, PC Gamer U.S. gave it a stellar review. I'm glad I didn't renew my subscription. Hell, they gave it the same score as Half-Life 2 and one damn percent ABOVE Half-Life. Astonishingly stupid.
I'd just like to ask. What part of the game did you find very bad, or too average? Not a great game, but so many parts of the game were amazing to play. They have alot of potential.
If you can run HL2 you can play Crysis. I don't see what everyone's moaning about.
There's your problem. Lower details and put resolution lower than 1600, maybe that'll help...Then my system is flawed because Episode Two and Bioshock run as smooth as oil at maximum details while Crysis is a slideshow...
There's your problem. Lower details and put resolution lower than 1600, maybe that'll help...
There's your problem. Lower details and put resolution lower than 1600, maybe that'll help...
Your own problem, not the game's. I had this friend who wouldn't play NHL 99 on anything other than max settings even though it was a slideshow. It doesn't mean the game has performance problems.In my humble opinion, at lower details Crysis is just another first person shooter. Not to start a war, just a personal thought.
Is that a job title? We need a "code optimiser". No. It has nothing to do with code. Only what appears on the screen.Compared to Half-life 2 and bioshock, Crysis runs pretty crappy for my system. And I can run Half-life 2 and bioshock at absolute maximum settings with good framerate.
For Crysis to be anything good I have to lower settings quite a bit.
And I also never play any games at resolution beyind 1280x1024.
Crysis is not in the same league at all as Half-life 2 and Bioshock in terms of optimized performance code.
Oh noes!What are we gonna do for benchmarks in the future?
It doesn't mean the game has performance problems.
I'm not trying to be a fanboy, defending Crytek and Crysis here, but to say the game is rubbish is bullshit. Even worse, not playing the game and just the demo and saying the game is bad, is bullshit.
/rant
What, you expect people to buy the game after playing the demo and forming the opinion of it being shit?
Demos are there for sole purposes of seeing how well it runs on your rig and getting a taste of what to expect when playing the full version.
Unless you're telling us to pirate the game and actually attempt to play through the slideshow, then respect everybody's opinion.
You're obviously trying to force your opinion on everybody, denying that the game is bad.
Huh, i played the whole game, and I'm just trying to say I'm tired of people playing the demo and saying it's bad. Also, I'm trying to defend the game not by saying it's great, but it's not crap either and if you have a good pc, you must play the game.
I have a dual core system with 2GB RAM and a 7800GTX card and played it with close to the same settings you did (I believe mine were all set to dead medium... have to check) and it ran well. It is otherwise a pretty basic shooter, but I found the gameplay pretty enjoyable (the 'flying' section was quite fun), and at medium settings it was still gorgeous which made it a "good" game in my book. Compared to Bioshock and Half Life 2, the gameplay, story, etc., Crysis pales, but I wouldn't say it was a "bad" game.I have a quadcore PC with a 7800gt and 4 gigs of ram. I was playing crysis on 1280x1024 which is the lowest ill ever play a game. I had AA and AF off, and all the other settings at either medium or high. I was getting an average of 25 fps and lower than 15 during gunfights with more than 3 people. My computer is far better than most peoples, and it ran like ass. So unless people shelled out big for DX 10 cards, multi-core processors, and multiple gigs of ram, then there was no way crysis could have been as big a success as they apparently expected.
I seriously think piracy is overestimated by quite some margin. I would never pirate a game unless it's exceptionally old and hard to find through retail methods.
I actually buy alot of old games too, heck just early this year I bought a rare game from the mid 80s for around 130 euro.
Is it a symptom of mental insanity if I buy games that I already own, just to have the Steam version? I know the answer...
We are suffering currently from the huge piracy that is encompassing Crysis
Chu, you can't make staements about Crysis being bad just by playing the demo.
Uh, yes you can. After all that's the whole ****ing point of a demo to demonstrate how bad/good the game is.