W4d5Y
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2006
- Messages
- 479
- Reaction score
- 1
No, this isn't any news about any event if that intentionally lame-sounding headline should have intrigued you and served as a pretext for you to open this thread up.
I just want to point this out:
Regarding some discrepancies I had with other people here on the forum, regarding certain extreme events that had occured in western US a little more than six years ago,
I just got to...persuade a classmate of mine to accept certain moronic views I share with probably, like, 2% of this forum's populace?
A hint: No, he is certainly not a moron, he is expirienced in informatics, has a cute girlfriend, and an IQ of about 132, if I remember quite correct.
So did my brother, who has an IQ of 154, and, judging by his success in school, certainly is not the dumbest person on this planet to share my views.
Not all of them, but regarding the core content, we have the same thoughts.
Now, I have an IQ quotient of "something over 130" (that's what a test actually spit out, I cannot confirm how accurate that is), although I suffer a bit at my grades for my lack of educational effort, which I basically swopped for conspiracy theories and their refutation.
On of my favourite, despite oldest, conspiracy theories is the intentional destruction of the world trade center's intentional destruction by "some not further defined insider".
And so far, I haven't heard anything from anybody here to actually convince me, that the firemen who felt a hot rush of air knocking their helmets off while they stood in a stairwell in one of the towers during its own collapse.
Point is: Even if NIST would disproove their conclusion that the fires in the towers were merely hotter than 250? celsius at some peak locations,
this doesn't conclude their couldn't have been "secondary devices", which the police and fire departments suspected to be placed in the buildings that day.
I am not somebody who stares at grainy, WTC-collapse footage over and over again up to a point where he concludes he saw something suspicious, which -undoubtedly- prooved their were bombs planted in the building.
Now, what I do is listen to the firemen, those, who even today, due to the lies of the EPA, had and still have to suffer from 9/11 even today, in form of lung-deseases.
What they say is shocking, to say the least.
And in this occasion, NIST nor 911myths will help those, who understandably are positioned on the skeptic side regarding the case for government complicity, debunk these numerous quotes.
I tried to inform the public by offering that information and let everybody evaluate that again, because after six years of commented conspiracy theory movies, most are saturated with this "kind of nonsense".
Thus, they will be hindered in a possible effort to look for further information that would surface and become publicly available with the time.
This is the kind of information that I share with them, and that prisonplanet shares with them (alongside a whole lot of advertisments, to be honest) but which will sink in the widths of the internet, because there will be nobody to take care of it and add it to general public knowledge.
And no, popular mechanics won't be exactely the ones who will tell you about compelling witness accounts, which will instantly, directly proportional to the incredibility of their content, be deemed false.
Because if they were accepted as true, the debunkers would face a serious problem to debunk those statements.
And no, 911myths has by far not covered all the explosion and bomb accounts by civilian witnesses (which of course also heard explosions, which were unquestionably due to other non-explosive origins) and professional firefighters reported.
And what I never heard of from any debunker was, what his interpretation of "the orders" was, that Dick Cheney had confirmed to be still in place from the presidential emergency bunker, by the time that he was made aware that a plane was closing into washington and "50 miles out". That account was initially made by transportation ministre Norman Mineta in front of the congressional 9/11 hearing.
I just want to point this out:
Regarding some discrepancies I had with other people here on the forum, regarding certain extreme events that had occured in western US a little more than six years ago,
I just got to...persuade a classmate of mine to accept certain moronic views I share with probably, like, 2% of this forum's populace?
A hint: No, he is certainly not a moron, he is expirienced in informatics, has a cute girlfriend, and an IQ of about 132, if I remember quite correct.
So did my brother, who has an IQ of 154, and, judging by his success in school, certainly is not the dumbest person on this planet to share my views.
Not all of them, but regarding the core content, we have the same thoughts.
Now, I have an IQ quotient of "something over 130" (that's what a test actually spit out, I cannot confirm how accurate that is), although I suffer a bit at my grades for my lack of educational effort, which I basically swopped for conspiracy theories and their refutation.
On of my favourite, despite oldest, conspiracy theories is the intentional destruction of the world trade center's intentional destruction by "some not further defined insider".
And so far, I haven't heard anything from anybody here to actually convince me, that the firemen who felt a hot rush of air knocking their helmets off while they stood in a stairwell in one of the towers during its own collapse.
Point is: Even if NIST would disproove their conclusion that the fires in the towers were merely hotter than 250? celsius at some peak locations,
this doesn't conclude their couldn't have been "secondary devices", which the police and fire departments suspected to be placed in the buildings that day.
I am not somebody who stares at grainy, WTC-collapse footage over and over again up to a point where he concludes he saw something suspicious, which -undoubtedly- prooved their were bombs planted in the building.
Now, what I do is listen to the firemen, those, who even today, due to the lies of the EPA, had and still have to suffer from 9/11 even today, in form of lung-deseases.
What they say is shocking, to say the least.
And in this occasion, NIST nor 911myths will help those, who understandably are positioned on the skeptic side regarding the case for government complicity, debunk these numerous quotes.
I tried to inform the public by offering that information and let everybody evaluate that again, because after six years of commented conspiracy theory movies, most are saturated with this "kind of nonsense".
Thus, they will be hindered in a possible effort to look for further information that would surface and become publicly available with the time.
This is the kind of information that I share with them, and that prisonplanet shares with them (alongside a whole lot of advertisments, to be honest) but which will sink in the widths of the internet, because there will be nobody to take care of it and add it to general public knowledge.
And no, popular mechanics won't be exactely the ones who will tell you about compelling witness accounts, which will instantly, directly proportional to the incredibility of their content, be deemed false.
Because if they were accepted as true, the debunkers would face a serious problem to debunk those statements.
And no, 911myths has by far not covered all the explosion and bomb accounts by civilian witnesses (which of course also heard explosions, which were unquestionably due to other non-explosive origins) and professional firefighters reported.
And what I never heard of from any debunker was, what his interpretation of "the orders" was, that Dick Cheney had confirmed to be still in place from the presidential emergency bunker, by the time that he was made aware that a plane was closing into washington and "50 miles out". That account was initially made by transportation ministre Norman Mineta in front of the congressional 9/11 hearing.
