Phisionary
Newbie
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2003
- Messages
- 1,305
- Reaction score
- 0
Yes. It means I love you all in an overtly sexual way, but I do so equally, with no seperations. At least that's what it means to me.
-Phision
-Phision
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally posted by PriNcE oF SpAcE
so what's your theory in connection with the story of Halflife?
now you mention something about exponential movement...so what? time travel? dimension jumping?
Originally posted by lambda^2
Ok it seems like my first post remained unnoticed between the spam-fight with tokin and friends, but actually I listed the formulas and their meanings there (when you're studying physics in 4th semester it's not that difficult), but ok some explanations:
First there is this big sigma () in the top right corner of the first picture, it's the sum from i=0 to 9 from xi², xi are the components of the vector r = (x0,x1,..,x9). When you for example want the length of a 3-dimensional vector r = (x,y,z) its |r| =((i=0,2) xi²)^(1/2) = squareroot(x²+y²+z²) = r, its like pythagoras with a 3dimensional triangle, in the movie it's 10dimensional. This- formula is the same that you can see on the second picture in the down left corner, there it's written as " ... x7²+x8²+x9²)^(1/2)-r4=0 ", the name of the vector is just r with an index 4, same thing.
Then there is the differential equation in the middle of both pictures, it's supposed to be this one:or, the solution(d'Alembert's solution) to this equations describe the movement of a wave. This can be any kind of wave, not only electromagnetic (light etc) but also acoustic and so on. But somehow they only wrote d/dt, not d²/dt² (d/dt is a (partial) derivative, d²/dt² the second derivative and so on.. actually thay wrote/t, that letter is a delta not alpha ), in this case the solution isn't a wave but exponential movement (not going up and down but speeding up all the time), if you want to know why exactly that is so, use google or so, kinda boring and long. And it is not the Schroedinger-equation.
There is one weird thing between the formulas, it seems like the Planck-constant h is also listed but I cant read in what context, you can see it on the top of the second picture.That constant is used it atomar physics, it's basically the smallest possible energy-unit.
k gtg hope this helped.
Originally posted by MoD
lambda², you'd be surprised how many people call it "The Half-Life A".
Anyway, I don't see a point in over analyzing this a day before top qual footage comes. As Marc Laidlaw said, : "I'm afraid I can't release any further information prematurely, but I suspect the textures you're studying will be easier to see in the near future."
Originally posted by Xtasy0
you realize they're probably going to release the movies as seperate sequences right? and that will be in the last sequence, so who knows when they'll release that one, i dont think they're putting them all up at the same time.
Originally posted by Dile
This vector thing reminds me of the teleportation from point A to point B, which was discussed in Blue Shift.
EDIT: But maybe its time travel.
Originally posted by LoneDeranger
What makes you think that? I don't think the guys at Valve are that evil.
actually, lambda is the variable for wavelength.Originally posted by lambda^2
About the Planck h; it seems to say "c h / lambda" in the video, and this is the energy of a photon (speed c, wavelength lambda) (a lambda is that thing in my avatar , but I guess everyone who played HL knows that.) I'm not sure about the lambda but there is some denominator and lambda would make sense.
well, when people kept asking gabe would reply "the first video" or whatever, it sounded like there were seperate videos *shrug*
"Seriously" I study physics and that post took me something like 5 minutes, plus 1 min for the screenshot. And no I don't have too much time, just came home and wanted to share my thoughts on this with the ppl who're interested in it before I go to sleep, when you don't care about this thread ignore it please. Way too much destructive bs in these forums.Originally posted by Kleptomaniac
You guys have WAY too much time on your hands. Seriously.
Originally posted by lambda^2
"Seriously" I study physics and that post took me something like 5 minutes, plus 1 min for the screenshot. And no I don't have too much time, just came home and wanted to share my thoughts on this with the ppl who're interested in it before I go to sleep, when you don't care about this thread ignore it please. Way too much destructive bs in these forums.