ph34r, the Japanese have developed a true WOMD

haha I can't belive people actually think it is real.. people these days.

edit: Ill take 2 please :D
 
:dozey: That's a Gundam, from the anime series... Anyways there's been another built as well, from the Zeta series.
 
ailevation said:
:dozey: That's a Gundam, from the anime series... Anyways there's been another built as well, from the Zeta series.

haha thanks aliviation, it was hard to tell :p

... what is the zeta series is it worth looking into? I love gundam wing.. hellscyth is so badass!
 
:naughty: Zeta was extension of the original Mobile Suit Gundam, same universe as they say. I believe it was Deathscythe Hell, Gundam Wing is what got me into Gundam, hehe.
 
It's badass. But it's probably nothing but a big statue.
It's probably hollow inside.
 
photoshop? I'm having a hard time believing this story, or maybe it's just a big Gundamn advertisement doll. You know how crazy the japs are!

Dang, some people are so gullible.
 
I'm leaning toward photoshop on this one. They have made Gundam props before:

gundamlive2.jpg


but the scale of this thing in enormous. Plus the quality of the picture masks any photoshop work that might have been carried out.
 
KInda looks convicing. Could be a simple toy though ( photoshop ). Untill I see this on BBC news I'm not gonna believe it :p
 
Haha, that would be cool.

/me starts making plans to sneak into Japan and steal it. :p
 
The Mullinator said:
I think everyone here realizes its fake, well almost everyone. :rolling:

Yeah, when I said I was leaning towards photoshop as an explanation, I meant as opposed to a film prop (not a real life mobile armour suit). There have been some pretty huge props built in the past, although these days they'd probably do it all in CG.
 
Yeah its a fake ofcourse it is...

I still want one!

Wait where in gods name should I put it? Oh yeah Id just take over the town.
 
Silly Japanese. Ah well, we have nothing to fear, most likely they'll use it to rape some cute schoolgirls (tentacles get old).
 
The Mullinator said:
Haha, that would be cool.

/me starts making plans to sneak into Japan and steal it. :p

need help? k done deal!
i get to keep it on Wednesdays, Thursdays, Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays and u get it on Mondays and Tuesdays ;)
 
how hard is to do that in photochop?

I never has used photochop but I never has see soo good photochops
 
If you have a toy or something yourself that you could photograph from any angle it wouldn't be too hard to find the right balance of focal length and scale so that it would fit into the perspective image. Alternatively the people in the factory might have been working on something that looked a bit like a giant robot and someone subly altered the details. It's very well done if it is a photoshop, judging by the fact that it's aparently motiveless (why the low quality) I'm now inclined to belive that it is some sort of model/prop/coincidence.
 
Dr. Freeman said:
need help? k done deal!
i get to keep it on Wednesdays, Thursdays, Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays and u get it on Mondays and Tuesdays ;)
All right sure... we'll just steal it on monday and then we'll see if you have a little... Accident. :E
 
Matthias said:
If you have a toy or something yourself that you could photograph from any angle it wouldn't be too hard to find the right balance of focal length and scale so that it would fit into the perspective image. Alternatively the people in the factory might have been working on something that looked a bit like a giant robot and someone subly altered the details. It's very well done if it is a photoshop, judging by the fact that it's aparently motiveless (why the low quality) I'm now inclined to belive that it is some sort of model/prop/coincidence.

I doubt that this was done is PS, unless it was done by a professional... it's pretty damned convincing :D. I've been using PS since I was 12 (almost 5 years, now) and I know for sure it'd be a huge pain in the ass to put so much work into such a small image like that... :-x
 
That's the reason I decided it was probably a genuine photograph, if you were going to photoshop it, why the low quality image?

The question remains, wtf is it?
 
Matthias said:
That's the reason I decided it was probably a genuine photograph, if you were going to photoshop it, why the low quality image?

The question remains, wtf is it?


How about photoshoping a huge high quality image and then reduce quality and size.
 
Back
Top