Absinthe
The Freeman
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2004
- Messages
- 14,037
- Reaction score
- 30
Alig said:CS:S was never planned to be anything different from the original CS except for graphics and physics etc. :|
Never said it was planned to be anything else. That doesn't make it any less underwhelming.
I don't think of CS:S as the best MP ever made because the fact i have'nt even got it makes it quite hard to judge but i DO, however think of CS as the best and most popular MP ever made and its been around for god knows how many years now and still it sits firmly as the most popular MP game on the planet.
Why would valve alter the way it plays when the way it plays now is good? that would be stupid...they could chance ruining a game that has no faults.
So? It's still an old game, regardless of how well it's formula works. I only bring this up because you accuse Halo 2 of just being more of the same. Is Valve not guilty of this as well?
I personally think that CS is highly overrated and has many faults.
Halo2 isn't bringing anything new to the MP aspect. It never brought anything new to SP either. Its only popular because FPS are few and far between on consoles and it just so happens that Halo is a console FPS. Its quite the same as racing games are few and far between on PC's and without the support for a control pad they all suck. I don't even know of a good racing game on PC that was'nt released on multiplatform but i'm certain that if i ever find one it might be good but it will never compare to a console racing game (like GT4).
It may not be new when compared to PC games, but it is on the console scene.
Anyway my point is that Halo2 may very well be a good FPS|) but on the PC FPS radar its a mere blip and HL2 will make it look even worse than i already think it is.
Well, you just admitted that there are different standards when one compares a PC FPS to a console FPS.
So I ask: Why the stupid comparisons?