Steam forums cracking down on garry's mod

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's really all I wanted to know. I have never released any porn pictures nor do I plan on doing so (I think i made that quite clear). I was just interested to see if you guys really believed in that or just did it because that's what you (or steampowered, for that matter) think the public will object to.

Which is completely a valid, of course. As a moderator I would probably do the same (at least if my site depends on sponsorship and ads). You could have just said so, instead you tried to justify it, which obvioulsy didn't work.
no offense
 
In my opinion, if you are mature enough to saw zombies in half, drive, hear swearing... I think dry sex is just as justifiable... I mean really, if you don't have the judgement to dechiper what is to be left in a game and what is to be done in real life... Well you shouldn't even bother playing/looking at a games forums.
 
CookieCuttah said:
In my opinion, if you are mature enough to saw zombies in half, drive, hear swearing... I think dry sex is just as justifiable... I mean really, if you don't have the judgement to dechiper what is to be left in a game and what is to be done in real life... Well you shouldn't even bother playing/looking at a games forums.

That's not the issue here. People are just pissed off with the incessant pics. They're not meant to be used in the same way as porn, they're meant as a joke, and the joke got old. So we've had enough.
 
yeah, if i were a moderator i'd likely do the same thing too..
i was just pointing out the irony..
(nice avatar Dark Elf!)
 
A-bloody-men.

Watch porn if you want. What happens between consenting adults behind closed doors is their business, if they want a damn camera there it's their choice.

The rules of this forum (and a lot of other gaming forums thank you very much) can be upheld however they like, and they don't want a lot of the unoriginal drivel produced with Garry's Mod to be posted everywhere.

They're not challenging your deeply held beliefs regarding innuendo and sexual security or whatever, they're challenging the hordes of idiots who persist in posting content that the vast majority of the community doesn't want to see or discuss.
 
Well it really -is- valve's fault for making the physics engine so damn real.

Your arguing a pointless case cause its not gonna change

Well, if you're talking about US laws, take a few steps down a Paris road, you'll be faced with (no ****ing joke) at least 20 porn / sneekpeak / toy stores all lined up. And Belgium commercials always have naked chicks on em. Not that I'm saying the US will be like this, but denying that a law will never change isn't very thoughtful.
 
Well, it won't change within the lifetime of the relevant authorities. Or, more to the point, it won't change within the lifetime of the brain-eating aliens who are clearly infesting some forumites.

No one is going to change their stance. The moderators are not mindless robots (well, one or two of them) and they're not going to suddenly switch stances- this is dependant on opinion rather than ethical values. They could well have banned repetetive flash games or IP-harvesting scams (heh), it just so happens that this is somehow relevant to nudity/sex and therefore plenty of people seem to get riled up over the issue.
 
.syL said:
There is a difference between simply being annoyed by something and BANNING IT (Yes, that's censorship).

This is all on privately owned servers etc. "freedom of speech" is non-existant here. "Censorship" definitely occurs, with any material deemed unsuitable for this site, or for the steampowered forums.

.syL said:
So, there has to be some other justification for it, which can only be that those pictures are offensive. Now, please explain to me why a picture of NON NUDE computer models (ppl seem to forget that) in a sexual pose are offensive, while a picture of alyxs hanging upside down from a meat hook isn't? I don't get it.

this site isn't for that content, its immature, its stupid, its becoming spam, and we dont want an atmosphere here where there are pictures of alyx having sex with dr kleiner everywhere; it makes the place look tacky and sleezy.


.syL said:
I honestly hope that that was some kind of joke, because that would in turn mean that you think playing a violent computer game is just one step away from going to your school and killing everyone while sacrificing a goat to satan

no, you misunderstood me there, my fault i think, you see, what the original poster was saying was that it was nearly at the level of animal sex in its... substance, and then I made the point that it was barely at the level of real pornography.
The issue here is not that its porn, but that its stupid spam, and while certain other forums may have it plastered everywhere, I'd like to think hl2.net is able to be a little above that.

If the forums operate in an environment that supports material such as that, it can only have a negative impact; its not so much what people do with the 'garryporn' but its what effect the 'garryporn' has on the people.

Imagine going to Forum A and seeing threads about "Dr Kleiner" and then going to Forum B and seeing a thread about "Dr Kleiner being sucked off by alyx!!111one" -which forum do you think you'd like to be a part of?
Its about having a decent community
 
I think it really all depends on the person who views the images. If you post something with pronographic material in it, Just say so in the title. If the "kids" see that and still look at the image, then their parents should just deal with it.

It's just like movies. Some are rated R for a reason. But if it said nothing and you went and watched it, you'd complain. And like posted earlier, There is violence in HL:2 that kids shouldn't even view. The game is intended for mature people. I don't really see what the problem is if "adults" view "animated" pron from a game. It's sorta like stick figure death animation. People whine about it, but they don't have to keep going back to find something else about it to whine about.


P.S. Is child pron illegal in Britain? 'Cause I swear I seen 3 naked girls in a bathtub in Monty Python's The Meaning of Life.

EDIT: To make this clear, I'm not trying to start any arguing. The joke has gotten old, I'm just stating that it doesn't matter. If you don't want to see the image, Don't open the post. It is that simple.
 
from what i know child porn of illigal everywhere!

I don't mind that they banned those stupid ppl who post pervert garry pics.. but they should never ban garry's mod since it's fun for editing
 
And you know why it is tabu to all you? (well, most of you)
Christianism (and other religions). I hate taboos/tabus. Every time you surpass a tabu, you surpass yourself.

It's obvious that the society is surpassing all the tabus: sexual education, condoms publicitys, sex shop... but very slowly. ;\

I mean, without it, we were extinct, we didn't have orgasms (can I say that word in this forum?), and we didn't have 90% of tabus, secrets and stuff. And 90% of the people do it. But no one talks about it. It's just shameless.

And you, do you still think it is racional to have tabus?
Where's the christian god, when Asia needs it? Bah, damn jesus! :p
 
Bullseye said:
from what i know child porn of illigal everywhere!

I don't mind that they banned those stupid ppl who post pervert garry pics.. but they should never ban garry's mod since it's fun for editing

noones banning garrysmod, its too cool :)
 
MigaS_tX said:
And you know why it is tabu to all you? (well, most of you)
Christianism (and other religions). I hate taboos/tabus. Every time you surpass a tabu, you surpass yourself.

It's obvious that the society is surpassing all the tabus: sexual education, condoms publicitys, sex shop... but very slowly. ;\

I mean, without it, we were extinct, we didn't have orgasms (can I say that word in this forum?), and we didn't have 90% of tabus, secrets and stuff. And 90% of the people do it. But no one talks about it. It's just shameless.

And you, do you still think it is racional to have tabus?
Where's the christian god, when Asia needs it? Bah, damn jesus! :p

Sorry for my bad english, but i'm just at the 8th year of school, in portugal. Soz! :/
 
MigaS_tX said:
Sorry for my bad english, but i'm just at the 8th year of school, in portugal. Soz! :/

Don't worry about that, posting in an english speaking forum is a great way to learn :) just take your time
 
And you, do you still think it is racional to have tabus?
Where's the christian god, when Asia needs it? Bah, damn jesus! :p
Are you saying damn jesus as in "Damn you jesus"?
If you are I'll get medeval on your ass. Having your own religion is one thing, But dissing someone elses is another. You don't see me saying, "Goto hell Bhudda!"
 
bliink said:
Don't worry about that, posting in an english speaking forum is a great way to learn :) just take your time
Thanks for the encouragement, bliink! ;) I'll try to improve! :D
 
gotta love firefox adblock extension. killed all the hyperlinked Ads in this thread right away.
 
Maddox said:
Are you saying damn jesus as in "Damn you jesus"?
If you are I'll get medeval on your ass. Having your own religion is one thing, But dissing someone elses is another. You don't see me saying, "Goto hell Bhudda!"

Hey, I don't want to offend any kind of religion.

It was more "i don't like this religion, grr" lol.
If you want, i'll delete that phrase. ;)
 
bliink said:
This is all on privately owned servers etc. "freedom of speech" is non-existant here. "Censorship" definitely occurs, with any material deemed unsuitable for this site, or for the steampowered forums.

Yeah, I'm well aware that freedom of speech applies only to state/people relationship, I was just trying to show the difference between being annoyed by something and banning it, because a lot of people reasoned that accounts should be banned simply because they are annoyed by something.


I'm not going to quote the rest of your post, but i still agree :). The only reason i started posting was because i wanted to see if maybe someone could convincingly explain why sexual poses are deeply offensive (to an extent to warrent an immediate ban, at least on steampowered) and other offensive material isn't.

Just keeping the community nice and decent is a completely different and valid issue, and as I said, I agree with you on that part. I was just trying to stir some reaction so see if ppl actually believe garry's porn (I'm sure he would love for it to be called that way ;)) is in some way more offensive than anything else.
 
.syL said:
Just keeping the community nice and decent is a completely different and valid issue, and as I said, I agree with you on that part. I was just trying to stir some reaction so see if ppl actually believe garry's porn (I'm sure he would love for it to be called that way ;)) is in some way more offensive than anything else.

Of course, garryporn is hardly offensive in a sexual sense (except maybe the gang-rape ones :\) but with this... phenomenon, the issue isn't primarily with sexual offense :)
At least you can all be happy that hl2.net is a little more flexible/relaxed than steampowered (but I can't blame them, we all snap sometime lol)
 
I wish this forum would take ALL the "look at my latest picture" posts and stick them in their own forums. I'm sick of them.
 
Ahnteis said:
I wish this forum would take ALL the "look at my latest picture" posts and stick them in their own forums. I'm sick of them.

I do, I shove them all in the art forum :p
 
bliink said:
Of course, garryporn is hardly offensive in a sexual sense (except maybe the gang-rape ones :\) but with this... phenomenon, the issue isn't primarily with sexual offense :)

Jeez, now I need to find someone who actually thinks that garryporn is offensive in a sexual sence to continue this debate :). Maybe I'll try steampowered, if only the mods would answer...

It is really interesting to see that the first thing virtually everyone did when starting up garry's mod was to create sexual poses. Maybe it's the all powerfull instinct to reproduce :).
 
.syL said:
Maybe it's the all powerfull instinct to reproduce :).

Or the near direct correlation between your average gamer's age and the average age of puberty :upstare:
 
Heh, the average gamer in the UK is over 20.

There're probably a lot of them who're stupid enough to consider garryporn (poor guy will go down in history for the wrong reason at this rate) funny/erotic, however.
 
Edcrab said:
There're probably a lot of them who're stupid enough to consider garryporn funny/erotic, however.

funny? sure... the first one or two maybe, but after 100, its kinda not funny anymore lol
erotic? :LOL:
 
Well there must be some reason why people are trying to stick up for their rights to pose pixel-carved fictional characters in sexual positions for god's sake. Don't look at me, I'm not a psychiatric practitioner.

There is a certificate on my wall with "psych" on it somewhere of course...
 
Edcrab said:
Well there must be some reason why people are trying to stick up for their rights to pose pixel-carved fictional characters in sexual positions for god's sake. Don't look at me, I'm not a psychiatric practitioner.

There is a certificate on my wall with "psych" on it somewhere of course...

Oh please. They have the rights to pose, screenshot, etc. but absolutely zero rights to post them on private forums should the admins not want it.
 
...

Hmm, I'm trying to figure out what you're saying in that post.

You do know that myself and most others are in agreement with you, right...?
 
I personally find them offensive.... Thats why I stay out of that thread...Don't get to see any of the creative stuff people do with garry mod, but I guess that was my choice, wasn't it?

horny teenagers..... :rolleyes:
 
.syL said:
instead you tried to justify it, which obvioulsy didn't work.
no offense

Only because I don't care enough to try harder.. Little point when it still stands that they'd be banned for it, so discussing it was a waste of your time, not mine, just a slight distraction while I had a smoke and channel surfed :p

no offence.
 
bliink said:
Custom CSS sprays should be removed :thumbs:

:p
Yeah, well, I agree... sort of. ****ing douchebags that use the tub_girl picture or goatse (didn't that get old like, years ago?) kinda piss me off but then again I've seen those pictures so many times they don't really gross me out anymore. But if custom sprays weren't allowed I wouldn't be able to show people my oh-so-hilarious hl2 pr0n spray. :p Mine is more funny than gross.. it's not like it contains nudity or anything.
 
Wraith said:
in america, violence is ok to show, love is not.

The issue is far removed from some uptight, anti-sex attitude; if you read the posts I've made in this thread, you can see why the pictures arent allowed here (and at steampowered most likely).

Its not an overt taboo problem, like its been made out as repetedly (dont you people read anymore? :p)
 
bliink said:
THEY ARENT "BOOBIES"!!

They're computer game characters welded to each other!!

How on earth they could be entertaining after this long escapes me!

I vote Bliink to be our 'anti-garrypr0n' director :thumbs:

I don't see how one dead person is against a dead person and then it is considered to be funny... I swear, it is worse than perverted pitcures, it is necrophiliacism(sp?)
 
Garry's mod shouldnt have been created in the first place, HL2 should be rated AO (Adults Only) by ESRB if this keeps going on.
 
What people code in their own time is up to them.

Anyhow, isn't that a little off topic?
 
You know the older I get the LESS responsibility I feel towards toning down computer and video game related stuff to make it "ok for kids." This is strange, since I figured I would feel a higher level of responsibility for this.

I used to think cursing in Battlefield and Desert Combat was immature. After all, there might be kids playing. But the more I played it the more I realized, "Hey, this game is not for kids."

If these Garry's Mod pictures were showing nudity and things of that nature, maybe I would understand. But quite frankly I think if it is ok for a kid to slice zombies in half with a circular saw or drop cars onto them or watch massive amounts of blood spraying onto a wall after shooting someone with a shotgun then showing computer characters in sexual positions is nothing to get excited about. This, of course, is American society in a bubble. Chopping someone in half is fine, but God forbid you should ever show them in sexual positions with their clothes on!!!

In fact, F@&* kids. As a rule nobody under 14 should be able to play any computer game that isn't specifically designated for kids. You hear that 13 year olds? F@*# you!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top