Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Israelis don't even use them for cover, they just shoot them. Shocked yet? No? Expected.
US provokes Iraq civil war
US and Israel intelligence are carring out a policy to provoke a civil war in Iraq. The purpose is to let Iraqis to kill Iraqis.
The real people behind the insurgence are US and Israel intelligence and Pentagon. They try to provoke a civil war in Iraq so US Army can stay in Iraq until next war: Iran's or Syria's.
Will a peaceful Iraq needs US occupation troop any more? No, US will have no excuse to stay.
How can US troops stay in Iraq? When there is riot, car bombing, death squad killing, civil war.
Well, the terrorist is there, withdraw troops is cut and run, Bush says. So Bush can have US troops stay in Mid-east until the next war - a war on Iran or Syria.
That's why we saw Al Qaida (a special force to act on behalf of US intelligence) launched attack at Shiite shrine to start the conflict between Sunni and Shiite. We already know the 911 attack was in the name of Al Qaida which gave Bush the justification to start the war in Mid-east - war on Afghanistan and Iraq.
The US and Israel intelligence controlled death squad of Iraqis government which is used to kill Sunni people. On the other hand they controlled insurgence and Al Qaida to kill Shiite civilians by car bombing. That is how they create a civil war in Iraq.
As far as I can recall, I've always thought of the insurgents in Iraq as religiously fanatical terrorists, or at least seriously misguided. As idiotic as the US has been, the insurgency itself carries most of the blame for civilian death and reversal of progression post-invasion.
Such a load of bull,
When an Israeli soldier hurts a bystander (war sucks),
HE TAKES HIM TO THE HOSPITAL.
Bullshit.You know CptS., I could raise at least three counter-points from this little article but I'll point out only one (got an exam to study to).
What about the 's.y.s.t.e.m'? :
"Military prosecutors have issued a five-count indictment against an Israeli officer who comrades say repeatedly shot a wounded 13-year old Palestinian girl to make sure that she was dead..."
the 'norm' of the system is to prosecute such people (or acts).
In Hisbulla/Hamas land he would have been a hero.
By the way, I know the story and it is false.
It started as a research-story at a prime-time Israeli program.
There was some sort of mutiny among the platoon and they wanted to kick
this officer home, with false accusations.
Once the real story got out, no 'serious' network was interested in publishing the plain facts. The 'facts' remain - Israeli officer shot several time an innocent girl.
The officer's life ruined (a Druz by the way).
Even Israeli networks were not interested in the true story as modern network stations are much alike.
Even so dear C'ptn, you dig (shit) you find - at least dig a true story man, I bet you can find one.
You know CptS., I could raise at least three counter-points from this little article but I'll point out only one (got an exam to study to).
What about the 's.y.s.t.e.m'? :
"Military prosecutors have issued a five-count indictment against an Israeli officer who comrades say repeatedly shot a wounded 13-year old Palestinian girl to make sure that she was dead..."
the 'norm' of the system is to prosecute such people (or acts).
By the way, I know the story and it is false.
It started as a research-story at a prime-time Israeli program.
There was some sort of mutiny among the platoon and they wanted to kick
this officer home, with false accusations.
Once the real story got out, no 'serious' network was interested in publishing the plain facts. The 'facts' remain - Israeli officer shot several time an innocent girl.
The officer's life ruined (a Druz by the way).
Even Israeli networks were not interested in the true story as modern network stations are much alike.
A tape recording of radio exchanges between soldiers involved in the incident, played on Israeli television, contradicts the army's account of the events and appears to show that the captain shot the girl in cold blood.
The official account claimed that Iman was shot as she walked towards an army post with her schoolbag because soldiers feared she was carrying a bomb.
But the tape recording of the radio conversation between soldiers at the scene reveals that, from the beginning, she was identified as a child and at no point was a bomb spoken about nor was she described as a threat. Iman was also at least 100 yards from any soldier.
Instead, the tape shows that the soldiers swiftly identified her as a "girl of about 10" who was "scared to death".
The tape also reveals that the soldiers said Iman was headed eastwards, away from the army post and back into the refugee camp, when she was shot.
At that point, Captain R took the unusual decision to leave the post in pursuit of the girl. He shot her dead and then "confirmed the kill" by emptying his magazine into her body.
The tape recording is of a three-way conversation between the army watchtower, the army post's operations room and the captain, who was a company commander.
The soldier in the watchtower radioed his colleagues after he saw Iman: "It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastward."
Operations room: "Are we talking about a girl under the age of 10?"
Watchtower: "A girl of about 10, she's behind the embankment, scared to death."
A few minutes later, Iman is shot in the leg from one of the army posts.
The watchtower: "I think that one of the positions took her out."
The company commander then moves in as Iman lies wounded and helpless.
Captain R: "I and another soldier ... are going in a little nearer, forward, to confirm the kill ... Receive a situation report. We fired and killed her ... I also confirmed the kill. Over."
Even so dear C'ptn, you dig (shit) you find - at least dig a true story man, I bet you can find one.
what does that have to do with anything? he was indited for murdering the girl after she was wounded .."mercy" killing is forbidden, had you read the article I provided you would have known that. You said Israeli soldiers would have sent them to the hospital I refurted your idiotic contention by proving that isnt the case ..which I've proved ..so what do your statements have to do with the fact I disproved your idiotic claim?
In Hisbulla/Hamas land he would have been a hero.
ya well forgive if me if I dont take the word of some random guy on the internets ...you'll have to provide sources
again you'll have to do better than that ...how about radio messages confirming the soldiers KNEW it was a child and that she was walking away from the post when she was gunned down?
disprove the above with sources or stfu, I'm tired of you ****ing partisan wankers apologizing for the wrong doings of your own side
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1358173,00.html
you proved nothing ...sources or shut uo
No.well, here you are.
You can translate it yourself, cause I won't do it for you.
Just like I've said, no recollection in foreign media (it's an msn.co.il site).
Your so full of it.
Thanks for calling me a partisan, you're too kind,
my little word wank.
No.
Thats just not acceptable, you will have to provide a readable source. This is an English speaking forum and your sources must be English, it's only fair.
No. The burden of proof is upon you.not acceptable - I'm devastated.
just go to Google-->translate.
Thats just my point, there was no correction in foreign media !
This happen on a DAILY basis with western media, especially with GB's networks.
No. The burden of proof is upon you.
I'm not translating your source, you'd only say what I found was a mistranslation.
Good, you just refused to play by the rules of logical discourse.Sorry whateveryouare,
I'm not proving anything to you.
YOU want to brainstorm on it, YOU DO IT.
YOU want to open you're clogged mind, YOU DO IT.
prove !!?? you gotta be joking.
News media generally employs people to translate for them. These translations will generally be, if nothing else, readable. This is not true of google translations.not acceptable - I'm devastated.
just go to Google-->translate.
Thats just my point, there was no correction in foreign media !
This happen on a DAILY basis with western media, especially with GB's networks.
Good, you just refused to play by the rules of logical discourse.
Please close the door on your way out.
News media generally employs people to translate for them. These translations will generally be, if nothing else, readable. This is not true of google translations.
If you want your source to influence the discourse in any way, you will need to translate it. Nobody else is going to do it for you, and on an english-speaking forum they should not be expected to.
As you brought up the source, the burden of elucidation is on you. I suspect that a continual refusal to properly engage in argument in the politics section will be construed as trolling. Please do not bullshit people around.
Of course, there's no way anybody can be sure they can trust your translation, but what can yer do?
The US and Israel intelligence controlled death squad of Iraqis government which is used to kill Sunni people. On the other hand they controlled insurgence and Al Qaida to kill Shiite civilians by car bombing. That is how they create a civil war in Iraq.
That was my point from the begining:
there is no English representation of the matter.
Why should anyone believe my translation if they did not believe me in the 1st place?
I gave the Google option as a '3rd-party' translation tool for anyone seeking another perspective.
I know an automated trans. tool is not optimal, but it delivers.
I can see the 'oh, you mistranslated it' arguement coming up, as can everyone else.
Right u r.
so in other words your points are meaningless to all but .001% of hl2.net members who can understand your article ...to the rest of us you might as well have posted a recipe for lentil soup or better still nothing at all. at least you wouldnt have wasted our time
If you would have been interested in half of the truth, you could have translated it a hundred times by now.
As you are interested only in your virual truth even the pope could not translate it for you.
takes a lot of effort to write g.o.o.g.l.e...c.o.m. and click translate.
Your not interested in the truth, your sole interest is your own stench.
If you had any honor for truth and justice you would have translated it
from ancient chinese.
Ancient ****ing chinese?If you would have been interested in half of the truth, you could have translated it a hundred times by now.
As you are interested only in your virual truth even the pope could not translate it for you.
takes a lot of effort to write g.o.o.g.l.e...c.o.m. and click translate.
Your not interested in the truth, your sole interest is your own stench.
If you had any honor for truth and justice you would have translated it
from ancient chinese.
Terrifying stuff.This latest message from Jerusalem fortunately is in English:-
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1180527966693&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
Apparently it's perfectly acceptable to wipe out all Palestinians because they are all equally responsible for the crimes or their fellow citizens....so much for living in the 20th century Israel.
"If they don't stop (trying to expel their oppressors) after we kill 100, then we must kill a thousand," said Shmuel Eliyahu. "And if they do not stop after 1,000 then we must kill 10,000. If they still don't stop we must kill 100,000, even a million. Whatever it takes to make them stop."
Welcome to the World you live in, Kadayi.
Palestinians are not responsible for civilian losses, but neither is the IDF. The terrorists are the ones who are responsible for civilian losses as they are they ones conducting launches from populated areas. Now, if it was possible to only kill terrorists in the airstrikes, there would be no problem, but they've made sure that this is impossible.
If you would have been interested in half of the truth, you could have translated it a hundred times by now.
As you are interested only in your virual truth even the pope could not translate it for you.
takes a lot of effort to write g.o.o.g.l.e...c.o.m. and click translate.
Your not interested in the truth, your sole interest is your own stench.
If you had any honor for truth and justice you would have translated it from ancient chinese.
"Capt. 'R' cleared of all charges"
In the 100-page court protocol that summed up the judges' unanimous decision of the shooting, the judges accepted the officer's claim that he thought the schoolgirl was a terrorist. The judges harshly criticized the military police probe, calling it amateurish. They also criticized the media, accusing it of being quick to judge the officer's fate before the court trial had been concluded.
The court also found that Capt. R had acted in accordance with army regulations and genuinely believed that the girl was in fact a terrorist at the time of the shooting.
Capt R. was indicted last November on two counts of illegal use of weapons, obstruction of justice, unbecoming behavior and the improper use of authority that endangered others. Throughout, he denied the charges against him and expressed his intention to clear his name ...
.... In February this year, in a dramatic about-face, one of the soldiers who testified that he had seen Capt. R. shoot Hams to death at point-blank range admitted to the court that he had lied. Because of the developments, the court ordered the release of Capt. R. from custody and the return of his weapon.
At the time, Eizenberg told The Jerusalem Post that the charges against his client were based mainly on the testimonies of two soldiers - the one who recanted and another who, in an earlier hearing, was unable to confirm that the company commander had aimed his weapon and shot the girl.