VirusType2
Newbie
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2005
- Messages
- 18,189
- Reaction score
- 2
Game sounds ass.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I'm not looking for much storyline in games, but **** me this is dumb.
Yep. Do you have windows 7 64bit by any chance and/or a Q6600? It's unplayable for me.anyone else having issues with the game crashing or freezing? i'm pissed off, i'm at one of the last levels and i can't ****ing finish the game. FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK
Lowlights from the BestBuy Dev chat with IW regarding MW2:
Dedicated server questions were greeted by being escorted out of the chat.
Max players for all versions is 9v9. Yes, I said 9v9.
No record feature in MW2 for PC.
No lean in the PC version (Mackey-IW: The game is not balanced for lean.)
PC Game is not yet finished*
*probably alludes to the fact that there will be future patches given reports that the PC SKU has already shipped.
Moriarte: Ignoring IW.net, is the PC version a direct port of the console version?
Mackey-IW: No, PC has custom stuff like mouse control, text chat in game, and graphics settings.
This person is a profound idiot. Of course Dice are going to support Dedicated Servers. The whole point of the Battlefield series is the high-player count.
It's not made better by the fact that theLEADER OF THE ULTRANATIONALIST PARTY himself participates in the massacre without wearing a hood or such, so he should be fully identifiable by surviving people and security cameras etc.. I think Infinity Ward should fire whoever came up with the basic idea for that level, why the **** would the leader himself participate? It just makes no f*cking sense.
Game sounds ass.
I've never seen a game that could benefit from a lean function more than MW2. Yet it doesn't have it..
It's really weird because Modern Warfare 1 had leaning.
So... i'm still debating on whether or not to buy this. Help me make my decision!
So... i'm still debating on whether or not to buy this. Help me make my decision!
I thought that Shepard said he didn't work for any government or ideals. I may have missed it but where did it say he was the leader of the Ultranationalists? It said he was part of a group calling itself the "shadow of Zakhaev".
Might wanna spoiler that.
Finished it earlier. Pfft what a terrible ending. Was basically ''fuk u, buy the sequel lolol''
also did anyone think Ramirez' story-arc ended kinda abruptly?
Shit, thought I did. Fixed.
Apart from the rather abrupt end, the events leading up to it were brilliant. I was surprised by the events of the Ramirez story, but I shouldn't have been given Infinity Wards tendancy tokill of it's characters. Hell they were going to kill off price before they realised he's become a very strong character in the games and asked Billy Murray to return. It really turned out to be quite unfair after everything Ghost and Ramirez went through to get to that chopper.
So much raeg in one cutscene.
I raged when Ghost died. The whole time, I thought he was Gaz in disguise, but then that dream was crushed, because he died before he could reveal himself. (if he was Gaz)
Erm you weren't playing as Ramirez during that mission, you were plying as Roach. Ramirez' story ended in Washington. I just that his story was over really quick and didn't seem to have any connection to events elsewhere. I guess IW just wanted to include both a 'grunt on the ground' campaign and the spec ops campaign like they did with MW1
I read aboutt he storyline and honestly I didnt like it
and honestly it have some metal gear solid vibe to it, monologue about how war changes at the begining,previous characters thought to be dead are back,blowing a nuke over a city to zap its electronic stuff, sudenly a close character turns to be the enemy and talks about how it wants to write history,a last fist fight
honestly that was so metalgearish that should be considered a rip off,and sure people will praise it while bashing metal gear
IWnet is lame, too few players for some maps, been in a number of laggy games but the party and matchmaking system itself seems pretty reliable
I've been watching a stream of someone playing the game and IWnet looks like a steaming turd. He's been matched into 1v4 games, matched into a laggy shit full red bar game with a full green bar host (the bars are ****ing stupid btw), matched into a game where he was the only person once the game has started, crashed while getting matched, matched into a game only for the game to literally say that the server is unavailable, and played a few games with hackers where he could do nothing but continue playing or leave and forfeit his match bonuses.
People are saying "yea, this works good enough, sometimes I get into a laggy game. but it's not that bad." They're essentially saying this whole system is hit or miss.
HIT OR MISS IS NOT GOOD ESPECIALLY COMPARED TO RELIABILITY OF DEDICATED SERVERS.
How anyone could settle for this is a shame.