'The Dark Knight Rises'

Didn't he only burn his half of the total money?
 
My main problem with TDK was how easily the Joker could acquire henchmen. Who in his right mind would work for that lunatic? And it's not like he could pay them all that much, seeing as how he burned the mob's money. It was also a bit ridiculous how he was the only one to survive the explosion at the police stations.
Lots of his henchmen were ex-arkham inmates and other crazies.
 
Yeah, either that or in it because they saw no other way of getting rid of Batman.

The rest were just greedy.
 
In a town with a crazed vigilante donning a Bat suit, why not work for the only person making waves?
 
Latest rumours say that Joseph Gordon-Levitt may be Alberto Falcone, also known as the Holiday Killer. While I'm not sure we'd see all/any of that storyline, it certainly would bring the story back to Begins, without using Ra's or Talia Al Ghul.

Apparently Juno Temple has also joined the cast as a "street-smart Gotham girl". Whatever the **** that's going to mean.
 
It doesn't really bother me that much, as that whole sequence is probably the best part of the film, but I've always wondered about that. Also, it's a little odd that after escaping the police station, he can just drive off in a police car erratically down the street and not get caught.

Eh, who gives a shit.

I'm fairly certain he's leaning out of the back window too, so I guess one of his buddies is driving the car?

joker_car.jpg
 
Let's hope not. The Dark Knight did a good job of driving the story forward, the last thing we need is hold ups relating to BB.
 
Let's hope not. The Dark Knight did a good job of driving the story forward, the last thing we need is hold ups relating to BB.

This. ^

Begins was the definite lesser of the two films.
 
Interesting, not sure if I like the mask or not, would need to see it from the front. Looks pretty cool though.
 
He looks about as good as I imagined it without going overboard, I bet he'll be even greater in action.
 
And why do you find it 'meh', Stemot? Continue to be honest.

Just not feeling at the minute, it's a guy in a crappy half arsed mask at the moment. Both Scarecrow and Joker had things that made them stand out and were similar to their comic counterparts even though the series tries to ground its self in reality. There is nothing remotely interesting about him at the moment. Of course I can't tell what the characters going to be like just of a picture but as far as this particular picture is concerned, it looks a bit 'meh', sorry.
 
In my opinion they shouldn't have picked this character at all. He just doesn't fit with the whole serious/realistic interpretation of the Batman Universe. He looks like a ****ing wrestler, there's no way I can take him seriously.
 
Bane is a interesting character. It's a shame everyone has the image of Batman and Robin in their head when it comes to Bane and assume he's only capable of being portrayed as a caricature of a brain-dead WWE wrestler.
 
Yeah, that look would be quite wrong in one of Nolans films though. I'm interested to see how Catwoman turns out...
 
is everybody forgetting how they felt in the year coming up to the dark knight re: the joker and heath ledger playing him? he and it turned out just fine, prior to any doubts they had over a couple of pictures of the make up and ledger beforehand.
 
ARG? Someone play it backwards or something.
 
Back
Top