Raziaar
I Hate Custom Titles
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2003
- Messages
- 29,769
- Reaction score
- 140
Did a search, and did not find any topic about The Last Samurai. Kind of surprised, but guess i'll make one.
I watched this movie shortly after it came out, and was blown away. It was one of my favorite of the year easily, up with Return of the King.
First off, let me say that I completely dislike Tom Cruise. I don't like him as an actor, I don't know him as a person. But... I was impressed with his acting in this movie, and I don' think it should deserve any less recognition, so I guess it kind of angers me when I go out and read reviews, and find some silly reviews focusing on such trivial aspects and taking unessesary jabs all in the name of 'professional journalism' I guess.
I found this review, and it kind of stirred up anger a bit. I know, quite silly feelings about a review.
http://www.nypost.com/movies/12628.htm
Some things that stand out in particular, are these.
This guy is an idiot. I don't see the similarities he finds in Ken Watanabe and Dwayne Johnson. They look nothing alike, and he goes to lessen the recognition that Ken deserves for yet another spectacularily done role. I felt a completely genuine 'japanese samurai' feel from Ken and his performance. Besides, Cruise wasn't the star of the movie here, Ken was. Tom played second fiddle in my opinion.
I don't like Tom Cruise either, but this guy could at least hold his prejudice aside for a moment when reviewing this movie. He's bringing up all his past dislikes of Cruise, and letting them shine through here. I didn't see any unnecessary camera tricks or unneeded focus where it wasn't deserved in this film. I guess the reviewer just doesn't see it. I hate to get upset about a review, but it just annoys me when movies are not given the praise that they deserve. The reviewer seems to hint that this movie was made in a very hollywood fashion, but I do not see much of that present. No sex scene, no unnecessary explosions. The movie has alot of class.
<grunts>
Guess i'll get over this tomorrow.
EDIT: One thing I will be curious about though, and probably will never be answered, is what the general feeling about the movie is to moviegoing Japanese in their own country. I have a japanese-american friend, who is very big into Samurai and he thought the movie was very well done and depicts the Samurai lifestyle honorably.
I watched this movie shortly after it came out, and was blown away. It was one of my favorite of the year easily, up with Return of the King.
First off, let me say that I completely dislike Tom Cruise. I don't like him as an actor, I don't know him as a person. But... I was impressed with his acting in this movie, and I don' think it should deserve any less recognition, so I guess it kind of angers me when I go out and read reviews, and find some silly reviews focusing on such trivial aspects and taking unessesary jabs all in the name of 'professional journalism' I guess.
I found this review, and it kind of stirred up anger a bit. I know, quite silly feelings about a review.
http://www.nypost.com/movies/12628.htm
Some things that stand out in particular, are these.
Algren's troops are slaughtered, but Algren shows such prowess as a warrior that the head samurai, Kasumoto (Ken Watanabe, who's not bad despite an unfortunate resemblance to Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson) decides to spare our hero's life.
This guy is an idiot. I don't see the similarities he finds in Ken Watanabe and Dwayne Johnson. They look nothing alike, and he goes to lessen the recognition that Ken deserves for yet another spectacularily done role. I felt a completely genuine 'japanese samurai' feel from Ken and his performance. Besides, Cruise wasn't the star of the movie here, Ken was. Tom played second fiddle in my opinion.
Beyond a rampaging vanity that makes it almost impossible for him show vulnerability, Cruise is a drastically limited actor whose "serious" repertoire consists almost entirely of narrowing his eyes while flashing his famous teeth.
And boy, do we see a lot of those eyes and teeth in a movie that often slows to a crawl to accommodate endless closeups of the star, surely the most influential of the 10 credited producers.
I don't like Tom Cruise either, but this guy could at least hold his prejudice aside for a moment when reviewing this movie. He's bringing up all his past dislikes of Cruise, and letting them shine through here. I didn't see any unnecessary camera tricks or unneeded focus where it wasn't deserved in this film. I guess the reviewer just doesn't see it. I hate to get upset about a review, but it just annoys me when movies are not given the praise that they deserve. The reviewer seems to hint that this movie was made in a very hollywood fashion, but I do not see much of that present. No sex scene, no unnecessary explosions. The movie has alot of class.
<grunts>
Guess i'll get over this tomorrow.
EDIT: One thing I will be curious about though, and probably will never be answered, is what the general feeling about the movie is to moviegoing Japanese in their own country. I have a japanese-american friend, who is very big into Samurai and he thought the movie was very well done and depicts the Samurai lifestyle honorably.