Too much sex in entertainment?

Lil' Timmy said:
:)

i was making a (not so) funny..
ah.
you know the bible and archbishop usher and all that mess?
no :|
anyway, 120 mil is way too long.. by people we usually mean homo sapiens, which appear about 100 kya, if you just meant hominids in general, that's back to like australopithicus genera or so, and that's only like 4.5 mya.
well, I can't remeber the specifics anymore. I saw a three part series on Nova a while ago, I seem to remember that number. Could be wrong. :)
 
Concerning assisted suicide, I personally would like the choice and I don't want any government telling me I can't end my life if I want to.

I can tell you a story about this.

An elderly couple lived in my town for many years. I got to know them pretty well and always stopped to talk with them whenever I bumped into them at the store or around town. The husband was a great guy that got along great with all the kids and liked to kid around with me when I was younger. Anyway, to get back to the story, he started to have some severe medical problems a few years ago. He kept getting worse and worse. Eventually, while his wife was gone he took out a gun and shot himself in their house where she found him when she got home.

I think the option of legal assisted suicide is better myself.
 
abconners said:
Weed is a gate way drug. Im saying that out of experience. I had friends, all of whom smoked weed, who decided to start doing shrooms. Then they would start putting cocaine on top of their bowls, or powdering them. In Amsterdam, there are an epidemic number of herion additcs and cocaine users. Corruption is running rampant. How is it a good thing to have your life focused entirely on destructive behavior?
You have absolutely no idea what youre talking about.
 
There are many weak people in this world who cant say no to sex and start abusing it. it becomes the biggest part of their life and thus they waste part of their life.

This quote stood out to me when I realized I could say the same thing about religion. :E
 
lol platinum, where do you live in okc? i grew up there.. on the nw side :)

(yeah, in the ghetto :()
 
Sex is a good, natural thing. It's religion we have to look out for....
 
abconners said:
I think it had gone wayyyyy too far when they show kate winslit nude in titanic. It was pg13 for crying out loud. It is unhealthy to be aroused by a damn false image.

Hold up... that scene was like three seconds long, and wasn't at all explicit.
If that one scene was pushing the limits, you definitely should stay away from classical art before your brain explodes.

I can't understand how the #1 argument against gays for religious folk is that "it's not natural," but then they balk at a woman without a shirt. Women have breasts. True story.
 
It isn't natural to bang some guy in the ass. This has no procreative purpose, only a pleasure purpose. Love the sinner, hate the sin.
 
Mechagodzilla said:
Hold up... that scene was like three seconds long, and wasn't at all explicit.
If that one scene was pushing the limits, you definitely should stay away from classical art before your brain explodes.

I can't understand how the #1 argument against gays for religious folk is that "it's not natural," but then they balk at a woman without a shirt. Women have breasts. True story.

True true.

As for the gays, they're vile creatures.
 
abconners said:
It isn't natural to bang some guy in the ass. This has no procreative purpose, only a pleasure purpose. Love the sinner, hate the sin.

Guess what?

You can say the exact same thing for a man a women having sex while using a condom.
 
abconners said:
It isn't natural to bang some guy in the ass. This has no procreative purpose, only a pleasure purpose.

It sure as hell is for some people.

By the way, I love how you make it sound like homosexuality is a temptation for all of us, but only the weak succumb. You make it sound as if you'd like to suck a cock, but won't because you practice a little more self-control than the rest of us.
 
:naughty: I just saw a fine chick, I want to have sex now.
 
Reaktor4 said:
the guys probably just trolling.
that's what i've assumed from the begining.. he kinda reminds me of a special troll that used to come around here. abc's not nearly as cool and clever though :|
 
Neutrino said:
Guess what?

You can say the exact same thing for a man a women having sex while using a condom.
Hello! Abuse of sex!
 
Religious people, im telling you, you need to find some reason for living besides pleasing your god.
 
1/10 abconners, and youre only getting that 1 for persistence. Well done. :thumbs:
 
abconners said:
Hello! Abuse of sex!

Ah, so you're saying protected sex is wrong too? Well atleast you're consistent. Have fun trying to convince the rest of the world of that though.
 
abconners said:
It isn't natural to bang some guy in the ass. This has no procreative purpose, only a pleasure purpose. Love the sinner, hate the sin.


Straight people have sex purely for pleasure all the time. Marriage would probably be pretty lame if you only had sex once per kid.

But it doesn't matter what convoluted reason you have for dismissing gays as lesser sinners.

You still seem to love "natural behaviour", yet oppose to even the slightest nudity. They're one and the same, nature and nudity.
 
I guess we will see whos right when we all are in our graves. until then it will be ring around the rosy.
 
abconners said:
I guess we will see whos right when we all are in our graves. until then it will be ring around the rosy.

Unless I'm right, in which case we will never know.
 
yea they wasted a whole 30 minutes on some cyber sex scene in matrix 2...how gay, they should have put some crazy action scene or something that has to do with the story
 
what i am interested in knowing is whether sexual innuendo is prominent on basic cable television in the UK and other parts of the world.

here in North America u can generally find such programming later at night.. and no im not referring to porn here.
i am talk about ur common sex scenes found in movies and such.
u can't find that on daytime and in most cases even in prime time North American television... i guess society here is still very protective of this issue.

so UK'ers, inform me! :p
 
i have basic cable,and i was flippin through channels

and i saw this porn star and you could see her breast b/c she was letting them hang out, so i do think the US shows nudity but late at night.
 
too much sex in entertainment? maybe there's just not enough enterainment in sex.
 
Lil' Timmy said:
too much sex in entertainment? maybe there's just not enough enterainment in sex.
maybe you're right.

have you seen those exercise cycles that you can race and it controls a racer on a screen? Maybe the same thing could be done for sex...

could even be a helpful sexual training tool for, um.. :| premature teenagers? have to be designed right... put in a timetrial and you'd just make things worse :O

making sex a competitive gaming experiance? might make for some happy girlfriends out there somewhere...
 
Well, I found out that for me having sex is far more different from wathcing it. Watching it is fictional, even if they want it to portray it as realistically as possible. To have sex with someone you love is quite a different experience. But people subconsciously think that things will be as they've seen it on TV and they get easily disappointed. There is too much sex on TV or the problem is that too young people see it when they don't have yet a critical opinion on the matter.
 
I find sex disgusting, but I believe it should be way more widespread but less focused.
 
Actually, it is completely natural to "bang some guy in the ass".

There's a "homosexual gene" that usually results in the birth of more children from an impregnated woman, if the father is carrying this "homosexual gene". There are also homosexual big cats, such as cheetahs.

So, what's your point?
 
This all really depends on what the public's view on such things are, and where you live. For instance, in a lot of European countries, sex or nudity is no big deal. Everybody's got a pecker. But in say, Germany, violence isn't really as welcome on TV or in games etc as it is in America. Now, which do you think is worse, a bit of nudity or people being pumped full of lead? Nudity is a not focal point in either society, nor does it present any real problem or danger, so why the hell care?

To me it's just TV. You don't like it, you don't watch it.
 
Wow it's amazing how people get so worked up over stuff like a nipple, but yet I watch on broadcast TV a cam from an attack helicopter blasting people to pieces (live). So showing people shredded by artillery is perfectly fine, but showing a boob here and there is satan? Please.... figure the people who are against sexuality must have no penis or something... :rolling:
 
Sprafa said:
I find sex disgusting, but I believe it should be way more widespread but less focused.

wtf?

Sex is one of the most beautiful things in live IMO :)

I don't think there's too much sex on tv, I mean - what's wrong with it?
 
qckbeam said:
Sex is a good, natural thing. It's religion we have to look out for....

True

( I don't say I do not believe in god - I just say religion, as it is in our world - is not doing a very good job most of the time)
 
Back
Top