CptStern
suckmonkey
- Joined
- May 5, 2004
- Messages
- 10,303
- Reaction score
- 62
Ah, but you know about the Big Mac, don't you? That meat may be processed so much that there's no flavor left, but that's why they inject the meat with flavor that they know people like. McDonald's didn't make its money making a good burger, they made their money by making a consistent burger.
you miss my point
Anyway, there's a lot of focus on Michael Bay here. Michael Bay this, Michael Bay that, his movies suck
well the thread is about one of his movies ..and yes he does suck ...as a film maker ..as an action film big box office movie maker he's quite good at what he does: delevering expensive schlock
...actually he even rips on himself about Armageddon in Transformers. But who cares who did it, y'know? Seriously, a couple of us guys hanging around outside after the premier were like, "Michael Bay? CLEAN SLATE." I don't give two shits about how bad Pearl Harbor was, this man made Transformers. And he did it well.
I guess I'm so far removed that I wouldnt be able to see the difference between any of his films ..from the rock to armaggeddon to the rock ..just pure unmitigated dreck ..again that's my opinion. And I agree, one movie does not give him a clean slate
In that same conversation outside the theater I was telling somebody, "It's like George Lucas. Episode 3 gave him the clean slate. It makes even Episodes 1 and 2 awesome movies." And they were GARBAGE. Friggin' garbage.
I guess, never been that much of a fan of lucas ..besides perhaps the entertainment factor of the first 2 movies ..after that it became more about the toys
Like I said, it just comes down to if you like Transformers or not.
no it doesnt ..I shouldnt have to be a fan of the toys/cartoon to enjoy a movie, it should stand on it's own merits
Anyone who saw the movie and loved The Transformers as a kid, you wouldn't care who it was directed by, you wouldn't care what that person'd done in the past
yes I would, even more so due to those very facts ..you dont want someone to butcher something you hold dear
you wouldn't care about anything except for the fact that this movie was incredible on some kind of scale that in itself is to incredible to even talk about. It was THAT good.
oh come on I cant take you seriously here
I mean, that's the whole reason I've been hearing complaints about camera angles or humor or this and that. It's because people who weren't transformers fans can focus on all these other things. Transformers fans see only the transformers. That's what we're seeing. It's too much for us, it's too cool. Camera angles, what? Man did you see Optimus Prime?! That's what I saw. What camera angles? This movie's directed by WHO? I don't give a ****; Megatron berated Starscream with a line from the original '86 movie!
That's how we're seeing it.
I dont care about camera angles ..there's a certain type of film making called Dogme 95 ..it's based on a set of strict rules filmakers must use when making their films (no cuts, sound must be on location and not edited afterwards etc) ..the point was to force the director to tell a good story and not focus on technique ...Michael Bay is all technique ..in other words I wouldnt care about the camera angles (either good or bad) because ultimately it's in the story where it falls apart ..if the Transformers were filmed according to the rules of Dogme it would be apparent how flimsy the entire thing is; by definition it favours style over substance. I brought Dogme up not as an example of what movies should do but rather as a means of illustrating how stripping a film of all of it's artifice reveals whether the story itself stands on it's own merits ..my guess is that it doesnt
that said I loved El Mariachi/Desperado: a completely over the top action movie ..mostly for it's extreme kick assery ..I do like mindless fun, I'm just choosey I guess