US Navy does cold fusion?

Yes! In your face Chechloslavakia! USA may very well one day be a power worth reckoning with. Possibly even a super power?!

Wait until I get my nuclear powered Ford Fiesta! Oh yea!


*Crushes beer can against face*
 
so if we want the next source of energy we should go to...
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2e8oWKMnKU8[/YOUTUBE]
 
I'm gonna have to call fake on this one. Cold fusion reports never seem right. Really we should be more interested in the real fusion research going on.
 
I'm still dancing to RJMC's youtube link. Damn, them guys can move.

Who needs cold fusion when you've got village people?
 
Well, they've done the Philidelphia Experiment and Scalar Waves before so I wouldn't be suprised if they've done this too.
 
The boy who called wolf with this i'm afraid, i would like to see this demonstrated.
 
Cold fusion has always worked, ever since Pons and Fleischman announced it, it's just not in the controlling interests of people to adopt it. I mean anyone can create it on a table for a smallish cost, if you watch the 1997 bbc documentary 'it runs of water', they create a kindof cold fusion using small metal beads at the end.

The reason people who run hot fusion experiments rubbish it as they have done is firstly because they are practically funded by the controlling interests that want to make sure that there is always a meter on peoples energy consumption. Secondly they think it's impossible, possibly because it's conveiniant to do that in their position but more so because there is a kindof dogma in science whereby we are using 100 year old theories to cite why it shouldn't work, when we fully know the wonders that particle physicists are discovering, with modern theories that do make it possible. So they don't even want to begin to test it's validity as it threatens their job, their benefactors, and ultimately their line of research.

This is power to the people kindof technology really so you can see why people with the money and power would actively resist this kindof technology getting into the public sector, simply because they know that if it went viral they would pretty much be ruined.
 
uh oh, Clarky is here, put the tin foil on
 
if I put a electric generator in a freezer I get cold fusion?
 
Cold fusion has always worked, ever since Pons and Fleischman announced it, it's just not in the controlling interests of people to adopt it. I mean anyone can create it on a table for a smallish cost, if you watch the 1997 bbc documentary 'it runs of water', they create a kindof cold fusion using small metal beads at the end.

The reason people who run hot fusion experiments rubbish it as they have done is firstly because they are practically funded by the controlling interests that want to make sure that there is always a meter on peoples energy consumption. Secondly they think it's impossible, possibly because it's conveiniant to do that in their position but more so because there is a kindof dogma in science whereby we are using 100 year old theories to cite why it shouldn't work, when we fully know the wonders that particle physicists are discovering, with modern theories that do make it possible. So they don't even want to begin to test it's validity as it threatens their job, their benefactors, and ultimately their line of research.

This is power to the people kindof technology really so you can see why people with the money and power would actively resist this kindof technology getting into the public sector, simply because they know that if it went viral they would pretty much be ruined.
Why do you always post this stuff.

One: No-body cares
Two: It doesn't seem you really understand what you're on about half the time, re our 'scalar waves' debate where I started making up words and you used them in your rebuttal.

What physics qualifications do you hold?
 
Why do you always post this stuff.

One: No-body cares
Two: It doesn't seem you really understand what you're on about half the time, re our 'scalar waves' debate where I started making up words and you used them in your rebuttal.

What physics qualifications do you hold?

One: People do care, just not you obviously
Two: I do understand it to the degree that I think it is possible, however it is often hard to explain to people who have a mindset of energy only being exchanged in 3 dimensions, when every indication is that it happens in 4.

I am an energy enthusiast, you don't need a qualification to understand the possible operation of these technologies, and it is more a point of weither it is true or not, and all the evidence suggests it's true.
 
One: People do care, just not you obviously
Two: I do understand it to the degree that I think it is possible, however it is often hard to explain to people who have a mindset of energy only being exchanged in 3 dimensions, when every indication is that it happens in 4.

I am an energy enthusiast, you don't need a qualification to understand the possible operation of these technologies, and it is more a point of weither it is true or not, and all the evidence suggests it's true.
Dimensions?
Like that thread you made about that flash video about 11dimensions, except the flash video completely misunderstood the whole concept and you were like wow this is what really happens and I noticed it thanks to my superior knowledge and made you look silly.
 
Cold fusion would be awesome...

"Honey start up the fusion reactor, I want my pot pie!"
 
Dimensions?
Like that thread you made about that flash video about 11dimensions, except the flash video completely misunderstood the whole concept and you were like wow this is what really happens and I noticed it thanks to my superior knowledge and made you look silly.

What the hell? I've always talked about 5 dimensional string theory and how they might think that could be practical, but the 11 dimensional thing is just wild theorising and I made that clear to you a while ago. I happen to find energy massively important because it is the driving force of society, and a society will always take on the structure of it's energy usage, if people are creating it themselves freely then that can only have positive results for people and communities themselves, even if it essentially negates the large corporate basis for supplying finite, unclean and/or potentially harmful energy with current methods.

If it becomes more abundant and easier to obtain, then naturally people will suffer less, and you can more easily and readily create sustainable and stable societies. I don't understand your 'beef' being as your a believer in socialisim, this kindof thing would have a positive impact on the feasablility of your views Solaris.
 
Damn it, the Political Forum is leaking again.
 
Cold fusion has always worked, ever since Pons and Fleischman announced it, it's just not in the controlling interests of people to adopt it. I mean anyone can create it on a table for a smallish cost, if you watch the 1997 bbc documentary 'it runs of water', they create a kindof cold fusion using small metal beads at the end.

The reason people who run hot fusion experiments rubbish it as they have done is firstly because they are practically funded by the controlling interests that want to make sure that there is always a meter on peoples energy consumption. Secondly they think it's impossible, possibly because it's conveiniant to do that in their position but more so because there is a kindof dogma in science whereby we are using 100 year old theories to cite why it shouldn't work, when we fully know the wonders that particle physicists are discovering, with modern theories that do make it possible. So they don't even want to begin to test it's validity as it threatens their job, their benefactors, and ultimately their line of research.

This is power to the people kindof technology really so you can see why people with the money and power would actively resist this kindof technology getting into the public sector, simply because they know that if it went viral they would pretty much be ruined.

Bullshit. If someone actually discovered it, they would become VERY rich, VERY quickly.
 
clarky, why exactly don't you try making some of the things you say if you're such an enthusiast. you said they were not expensive and too complicated.

btw, i really doubt that the invention that could jump start humanity for 10000 years is being neglected. obviously there must be something wrong.

what exactly is stopping anybody for using it. the oil corporations?
who can stop some half-assed physicist in the middle of siberia who wants to make such a generator.

just think about it for a second.

did you ever read some documentation not written in text, but in mathematical language, on which you base your statements? do you even know mathematics? because text often lie, math rarely does.
 
clarky, why exactly don't you try making some of the things you say if you're such an enthusiast. you said they were not expensive and too complicated.

btw, i really doubt that the invention that could jump start humanity for 10000 years is being neglected. obviously there must be something wrong.

what exactly is stopping anybody for using it. the oil corporations?
who can stop some half-assed physicist in the middle of siberia who wants to make such a generator.

just think about it for a second.

did you ever read some documentation not written in text, but in mathematical language, on which you base your statements? do you even know mathematics? because text often lie, math rarely does.

maths do lie

I once put 2.2 on a calculator and showed 2.2 D:
 
Back
Top