Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yes, because in Lemonking's world game developers can operate without money.
Valve though it is VERY customer friendly company,also cares about money.
I don't think anyone is going to pass up the chance to work for Valve because of not making enough moneymore money for games and top notch people .
Itll be like
Me: Okay.. Hmm.. what gun to buy.. oh, i'll just get an MP5.
beep
Would you like a macho-fries with that? Get new macho fries at del taco! I'm lovin it!
Me: Wtf?! Thats like del-taco+mcdonalds!
presses okay.
Please enter address!
Enters next door neighbor's address.
5 minutes later...
Outside: Guy: Hey! I didn't order these fries!
Me: Hahahahaha!
Funny - I'm the opposite. I could tolerate a few tasteful in-game ads but I'm very much against the ads on the scoreboard and in spectator mode.Valve told us where the ads would be, and I'm fine with them (billboards though in-game could be questionable depending on how they handle them)
But you know it's just an invitation to spray goatse.I don't mind billboard like ads. Infact, I'd kinda like an ad for a 'Love Sack' in the middle of a pub.
Did I miss something?and the money is guaranteed to go towards making better games.
cept I don't actually play CS:S which is also filled with retards.You CS:S n00bs will be next.
Time for "F*** VALVe" signatures?
That seems excessive.Time for "F*** VALVe" signatures?
we're not quite at the level of "**** you valve" ..that's still reserved for EA ..should valve start charging $ for cheats/unlocks/shitty games/tutorials/shitty games/franchise horse beating/raping of IP's/shitty games/movie tie-ins then we can finally say "**** you valve"
That seems excessive.
Its time to sign a petition and generally kick up a fuss. When valve sees that a large percentage of the community is against this they will back down and it will just be another example of what separates them from EA.
That seems excessive.
Its time to sign a petition and generally kick up a fuss. When valve sees that a large percentage of the community is against this they will back down and it will just be another example of what separates them from EA.
roflcopter12. angel666 COUNTERSTRIKE 4EVA angel666
11. Tim McMillen how can u do this... Tim McMillen
10. Justin Browne Justin Browne
9. James Boley James Boley
8. Hudson|ops|SBG| Ads are a bad idea by money hungry company execs who no nothing about gaming . Hudson|ops|SBG|
7. Charles Schlicht save counterstrike! Charles Schlicht
6. LunchBox aka Handy Andy Games are to play not for advertising and making cash out of players etc etc... Andy B
5. Demoz Save Cs! Demoz
4. [KM]Crzy88 dont mess with my fekin game ! n00bs! [KM]Crzy88
3. xen If ads got into cs I would delete everything valve and steam related from my computer xen
2. Sabre NO ADS PLZ Sabre
1. Patrick McCabe No, i will not allow this on my server
Valve have no right to force these ad's upon us, we paid for this game, you have got your money Valve! stop being greedy leeches just like EA and forcing ad's upon us, your so-far faithful community
Not thinking far enough here...
- We pay good money for a game.
- Valve gets that money.
- They then get more money from advertising.
- Game still costs the same.
Im all for paying for a game that I will enjoy. I however do not want to pay for a game that Valve will be making double money on. they will certainly make enough profit from this to cover the sales cost of the game.
Ingame ads mean bigger budgets for future games, better graphics, better gameplay, better production value, better everything that comes with more money. As long as the ads don't interfer with gameplay, i'm all for them.
Well, you have to have a look at a company's history to be able to make predictions about that. Just compare EA and Valve in that respect alone, and you should realize why not a lot of people are angry about this.Bigger budget may be the same as bigger games, but the bandwagon these days is that bigger games do not automatically turn into better games.
One could just as easily say "bigger budgets means lazier devs taking more time making more pointlessly bloated games".
I'm not saying that is how it is going to be for sure, but it's not like more money to the devs will automatically be beneficial to us customers as some seem to think.
.bog.
Well, you have to have a look at a company's history to be able to make predictions about that. Just compare EA and Valve in that respect alone, and you should realize why not a lot of people are angry about this.