Asus
Newbie
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2003
- Messages
- 10,346
- Reaction score
- 0
...than OS X?
Of course Macs don't have the market share to be as big of a target as MS.
Of course Macs don't have the market share to be as big of a target as MS.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
hahaStill not buying it yet.
haha
Of course you aren't and neither am I.
It is. I have an OEM copy of XP, and I found this out the hard way when I decided to flash my BIOS, and Windows decided that a new BIOS means a new motherboard. I called MS support, got some guy in India, and successfully convinced him after half an hour that my motherboard hadn't changed. So I got a second activation key \o/I'm using my OEM XP for all it's worth, then I'm moving on, since I hear that this copy of OEM XP is tied to my motherboard, so If I replace the mobo, XP won't work. Some licensing deal with MS and emachines to keep the price down for eMachines.
Well I had Vista, and I can say that every game was a lot slower! On EP1,on XP was going with 50-60fps on 1024*768, and on Vista on that resolution, with only 15 or 20...not to mention the system is hell slow :flame:
The only game-performance problems in Vista are from drivers. Other than that, Vista should improve games performance overall simply due to the strict driver module.Well, it's brand new software, and is built for the future.
You should have turned off Aero, for starters, if your PC wasn't up to the task.
About game performance: That sucks really bad. So what is the deal, is it only good at DX10? Or is it just bad for games over all? Do you really think they can make up that much difference? I thought Vista was supposed to be better for games!
This is depressing.
What issues ? And what hardware has driver problems ?Ive been using vista since its release, I wouldnt reccomend anyone get it, it still has issues, and some hardware isnt even supported anymore. Lets not get started about drivers. Going from xp to vista is at the moment like going one step backwards, so do yourself a favor and don't unless you just gotta have it now, kinda like me
What issues ? And what hardware has driver problems ?
While it sounds good, I don't think it will be practical. From what I've read they can't get it to even run yet. And from what I understand (I'm not a programmer) he's trying to translate each dx10 feature to dx9 and use the cpu for the calculations. That might pose a problem for most machines.I've read articles about some dev team bringing dx10 to xp, so I might never buy vista.
Strange. I never had a problem getting my OEM XP reactivated. 5min or less on the phone and it's done. I've used the same copy (not at the same time) on about 8 motherboard changes, a few cpu upgrades and a few completely different machines. Must be a new breed of DIY'ers because up until recently I never heard of DIY'ers thinking they need retail versions because they couldn't use their OEM versions if they upgraded components.It is. I have an OEM copy of XP, and I found this out the hard way when I decided to flash my BIOS, and Windows decided that a new BIOS means a new motherboard. I called MS support, got some guy in India, and successfully convinced him after half an hour that my motherboard hadn't changed. So I got a second activation key \o/
How the hell does that mean they 'know' it's a failure and do you have any other reason for saying they known Vista is a failure ?It also looks like MS knows Vista is a failure at the moment, because I could've sworn they previously stated they would support XP until 2010. I see now they are dropping support in 08 (I believe January). Must be desperate for Vista sales.