Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
K e r b e r o s said:Yea, and then, without America, the tide turned, and Germany was bled dry up to 15 million reported missing, wounded or killed in action.
No, not even practically. He suggested it, to take some struggle off of some future battles that might allow his armor to break through -- but with Hitler's idiotic lack of initiative, and his commanders bleak and often blinding fanaticsm, the Germans failed to gain any ground as of 1943. The Soviets drove the Germans back to the Berlin, and suffocated them.
The attack in through Poland, Belorussa, is the attack that bled the Germans dry.
You too, eh? Well, its not just us -- its a whole historical foundation. Glad to know your with us.
Full AckArdoramor said:I completely agree! When US entered the war in europe (d-day 1944), Russia was closing in on Berlin! Guess where all the scientists went who fled from Russians? They all went to the US. Well, those how didn't make it died somewhere is Siberia (im sort of sorry but then again, they would've done the same to me if Nazis had a chance). So not only US got money out of WWII but they also got resources that helped them out in Cold War... they drained Europe of its scientific community by "liberating" it.
German death toll: 3,8 million soldiers and 1,65 million civiliansK e r b e r o s said:Yea, and then, without America, the tide turned, and Germany was bled dry up to 15 million reported missing, wounded or killed in action.
First: Excuse me? I've never seen any reliable estimate of total German military casualties (killed and wounded) for the ENTIRE war that were over 10 million.
EDIt: Wait... I just noticed you said without America... so either you're neing sarcastic or you're relying on some kind of bizarre alternate history.
He "suggested it" (at least 7 times that I know of, at times "suggesting" that the USSR was going to be crippled or defeated without a second front being opened), because without that second front he was dog meat. He was barely managing to hold off the Germans and he was taking millions of casualties doing it. Not a situation that lends itself to being maintained for very long.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Where is your sorry for exploiting Europe during WWI and WWII by cashing in on selling weaponds to both side?
they are like that annoying neighbor that always reminds you of that little thing he did once but when he needs something then you have to do it no matter what.
where is your sorry for Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Where is your sorry for reasing the dust in middle east and causing the suicide attacks to get to Europe? Where is your sorry for exploiting Europe during WWI and WWII by cashing in on selling weaponds to both side? Where is your sorry for killing innocent Iraquis just to get Sadam? Where is your sorry for supporting Afgan militia with weapons they later used against peaceful people? No sorries will make up for crap you did... and maybe no thank you's will make up for good you did too... so what is your point exactly
K e r b e r o s said:I'am not responsible for those -- so get your apology from someone that was.
...you?
Maybe a nuke over the sea of japan would reach the goal too...maybe one bomb would be enough...K e r b e r o s said:If those failed, we would've invaded Japan -- and the civilian cost would've been much greater -- aswell as the cost in Soldiers.
No sorries will make up for crap you did... and maybe no thank you's will make up for good you did too... so what is your point exactly? Do we have to start to mention our sarcastic sorries so supporting your country when it was no more powerful then a little baby is? This is the BS that pisses me off about the US of A... they are like that annoying neighbor that always reminds you of that little thing he did once but when he needs something then you have to do it no matter what.
Why are you taking it personally?
My point is that threads like these are useless in proving anything...
http://www.fathersforlife.org/hist/wwiicas.htm
numbers may vary...but at least u can see the dimension of casualties.
Maybe a nuke over the sea of japan would reach the goal too...maybe one bomb would be enough...
I just wanted to give a controllable database...K e r b e r o s said:But you can also read what I've stated.
OK, I didn´t know that Japan didn´t surrender after the first bomb. So the way the US did was hard but the better way. I thought that the Japanese would surrender if they knew that the US got the bomb...K e r b e r o s said:One, "nuke" did'nt do it. Japan did'nt surrender the first time. The second did it. If the second one did'nt go, then we would've invaded. We were already off of Tokyo bay ...
OK, I didn´t know that Japan didn´t surrender after the first bomb. So the way the US did was hard but the better way. I thought that the Japanese would surrender if they knew that the US got the bomb...
btw I'm reporting your spam cuz it's just getting intolerable
Terrorists and dictatorships are two different things.KoreBolteR said:the millions were mostly killed by the evil tyrants and militia themselves, they wouldnt have dies if those terrorists wasnt doing what they were doing in the first place
Bodacious said:What do you consider spam?
If people only reported you every time you insulted somebody. Maybe we should start now eh?btw I'm reporting your spam cuz it's just getting intolerable
seinfeldrules said:If people only reported you every time you insulted somebody. Maybe we should start now eh?
..man if you cant even take the word of your president I dont know who you'll believe
..the reason why the second bomb was dropped was because japan hadnt yet agreed to an unconditional surrender ..they wanted to keep their emperor
His military advisors told him 1 million. 100 million Japanese going all out on 2 million allied troops. Look at Okinawa 600 miles from Japan and they still inflicted 20,000 US casualties. Furthermore, we arent taking into account JAPANESE deaths from an invasion. The number would have been staggering....btw the jury is still out of the 1 mil allied soldiers saved ..there's some evidence that says the number is closer to 200,000 ..but you'd know all this if you had read the truman diaries ..man if you cant even take the word of your president I dont know who you'll believe
Those were the terms stern.the reason why the second bomb was dropped was because japan hadnt yet agreed to an unconditional surrender