No Limit
Party Escort Bot
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2003
- Messages
- 9,018
- Reaction score
- 1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yeah, when releasing those photos means taking a political hit the neocons must do everything to block them. After all, trying to forget the soldiers died for your war is a great way to honor their sacrifice .CptStern said:that's a heck of a lot of photos
I wonder where he got all those casket pics from ..they're very hard to find
No Limit said:Yeah, when releasing those photos means taking a political hit the neocons must do everything to block them. After all, trying to forget the soldiers died for your war is a great way to honor their sacrifice .
No Limit said:Yeah, when releasing those photos means taking a political hit the neocons must do everything to block them. After all, trying to forget the soldiers died for your war is a great way to honor their sacrifice .
CptStern said:yup:
The Washington Post reported Wednesday that the Bush administration has ordered the Pentagon to prevent any news coverage of the bodies of US troops being sent home from Iraq. The blackout on casualties is part of the attempt by the White House to recast the nightmare in Iraq as a “good news” story.
source
redhollowpoint said:hey no limit did you ever wonder what 1,000,000 + looks like, yeah its how many saddam killed :bounce: guess you dont want to tell about that though
redhollowpoint said:its sad that you would use coffins to motivate a political agenda, shows how much respect you have for the fallen heros.
redhollowpoint said:why do you need to see a mutilated american body to get your political point across i see no sense in it
CptStern said:800,000 of those were iranian soldiers ...far more civilians have died as a direct/indirect result of US intervention
shows how little respect you have for the dead when you wont even acknowledge them ...why are pics of flag draped coffins banned? please explain, do go into a side tangent ..explain in your own words what purpose banning photos of war dead serves
CptStern said:please take the time to actually READ the passage before commenting ..WAR DEAD IN COFFINS:
"news coverage of the bodies of US troops being sent home from Iraq"
Really? And what is the motive for not showing them? Families have nothing to do with it, the coffins don't have a name over them. So please, elighten me. Because to me it seems like Bush wants to forget about these people dying.redhollowpoint said:ok soryr over stepped myself say mutilated dead bodies, but coffins dont make much sense of showing, show some respect to the familys and men/women that gave thier lives, you know by showing these coffins your trying to get a reaction against the occupation. thats your only motive for showing them
No Limit said:Really? And what is the motive for not showing them? Families have nothing to do with it, the coffins don't have a name over them. So please, elighten me. Because to me it seems like Bush wants to forget about these people dying.
You didn't mind it in the 80s, in fact, you supported it. Why this sudden interest of the lives of Iranians?redhollowpoint said:so stern just cause they are iranian soldiers, the use of chemical gasses are ok? 800,000 dead iranian soldiers is ok with you???
IIRC the Vietnam war had footage and photos of the coffins shown on the news and in papers.redhollowpoint said:forget about them? why dont you just take pictures of the cemetrys that they are burried in, you dont need to make a PR OP out of coffins in an airplane, thats blatent disrespect. No other war has photographers taking pictures of coffins, and i dont see why this one should be the same.
The_Monkey said:You didn't mind it in the 80s, in fact, you supported it. Why this sudden interest of the lives of Iranians?
dekstar said:IIRC the Vietnam war had footage and photos of the coffins shown on the news and in papers.
And that was a big success wasn't it?
I always see coffins on TV when a celebrity dies, or some child dies from a freak accident etc. I don't find that disrespectful. I think it's entirely dependant on why the coffin is shown.No other war has photographers taking pictures of coffins, and i dont see why this one should be the same.
Solaris said:People like you don't seem to care for Iraqi Civillians, so maybe seeing the dead of your own, will get the point across?
Mr-Fusion said:Hey they're not supposed to show faces of the dead or the coffins!! That's supposed to be cut out so people don't make an emotional connection to reports of dead soldiers.
"In todays stories 3 U.S soldiers were killed by a roadside bomb"
*cuts to footage of a humvee*
"And now to the weather!"
News told in such a way that nobody cares. How about a 3 minute reflection on the dead soldiers lives and the family/friends they leave behind? No? The government and media is doing a pretty good job at keeping the populace emotionally disconnected from the casualties of war.
I always see coffins on TV when a celebrity dies, or some child dies from a freak accident etc. I don't find that disrespectful. I think it's entirely dependant on why the coffin is shown.
If the media ran a story on a U.S soldier who died, shows his face, interviews his weeping mother, then ends with his coffin being carried by marines i would say that is the ultimate form of respect.
Oh yes, like levelling a civillian contry.redhollowpoint said:try to stay on topic, any way iraqi civilians, god, if you only knew what the military does to minimize civilian casualties, maybe you should talk to some first hand experience rather than taking the media as your bible for information.
redhollowpoint said:so stern just cause they are iranian soldiers, the use of chemical gasses are ok? 800,000 dead iranian soldiers is ok with you???
Solaris said:Oh yes, like levelling a civillian contry.
Does fallujah ring a bell?
The US massacared civillians there.
redhollowpoint said:so stern just cause they are iranian soldiers, the use of chemical gasses are ok? 800,000 dead iranian soldiers is ok with you???
redhollowpoint said:i wont acknowlegde them?,
redhollowpoint said:i dont need to see pictures of thier coffins, or bodies it acknowledge that they are dead, i dont see the point of seeing thier coffin it doesnt suddenly mean something important. i respect every soldier/marine/salior/ or airmen that gives thier life in the line of duty, to further my point i have recently enlisted in the marine corps, and if i die, i dont want to have you loooking at my coffin, so you can fuel your rediculous left wing jihad against america.
redhollowpoint said:ok soryr over stepped myself say mutilated dead bodies, but coffins dont make much sense of showing, show some respect to the familys and men/women that gave thier lives, you know by showing these coffins your trying to get a reaction against the occupation. thats your only motive for showing them
redhollowpoint said:if you only knew what the military does to minimize civilian casualties, maybe you should talk to some first hand experience rather than taking the media as your bible for information.
Absinthe said:Holy leaping **** lizards, read up on your history, little man.
CptStern said:both sides used chemical weapons ...provided by the west ...you all didnt seem to care about WMD back then
yes you, the right, the supporters of the war
rambling idiocy aside ..I'm sure the families of the soldiers would want their country to respect their dead ....seriously what possible motive could their be behind banning photos of flag covered coffins ...please answer this time as you avoided it before
do you have telepathy? you must because you seem to know my motivations
redhollowpoint said:correct me then if your all knowing. i dont have an almanac in my head.
Solaris said:Oops, I meant city.
Evacuate fallujah? To where exactly?
These people don't have holiday homes to go to.
Absinthe said:Then read up on these things before you talk about them.
redhollowpoint said:showing coffins, to me, is a sign of disrespect, i feel as though you and the people who are taking the photos are soley using them to get a reaction out of the public to take away support for the occupation, and our troops, i have stated this many times in the thread, dont try and say im avoiding your question, try and read next time.
redhollowpoint said:im still waiting to be corrected.:naughty:
Absinthe said:Well, duh. They obviously don't support the war and think it's a waste. The photos exemplify that.
Corrected on what?
redhollowpoint said:i could care less about WMD's i know they prove no threat to america, atleast from iraq, i firmly support the war based on freeing a society.
redhollowpoint said:showing coffins, to me, is a sign of disrespect,
redhollowpoint said:i feel as though you and the people who are taking the photos are soley using them to get a reaction out of the public to take away support for the occupation, and our troops, i have stated this many times in the thread, dont try and say im avoiding your question, try and read next time.
redhollowpoint said:why not take pictures of the good done in iraq??? and i know all your going to say is what good, but there is progress being made, if you look at the interviews, and talk to the soldiers they all report progress, and they all hate how the media portrays them, and thier actions. so no the photos only exemplify a bias.
redhollowpoint said:why not take pictures of the good done in iraq???
redhollowpoint said:and i know all your going to say is what good, but there is progress being made, if you look at the interviews, and talk to the soldiers they all report progress, and they all hate how the media portrays them, and thier actions. so no the photos only exemplify a bias.
leave the city, until the battle is over, its not the U.S's concern where they go. are you going to bitch to me now about having them homes for one week, its a friggin war they are in the military cant construct holiday inns for everybody before an invasion fallujah, the most they can do is have them get out for like a week before they can return to thier homes.
The_Monkey said:You didn't mind it in the 80s, in fact, you supported it. Why this sudden interest of the lives of Iranians?
The idiots that attacked Iraq in 2003 supported it back then. So you are right :dozey:.Spicy Tuna said:duh sure all americans supported it :angel: